Skip to content
The Greenly Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Greenly Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$66k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$272kArts & Culture$87kHuman Services$27kRecreation & Sports$24kReligion$23kHealth$18kCommunity Improvement$17kFood & Nutrition$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
$1,867
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL PENN EDUCATION FOUNDATION$20,000
CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSN OF GREATER HARRISBURG$10,000
BLOOMSBURG AREA YMCA$10,000
WITF$10,000
GREY TOWERS HERITAGE ASSN$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC$1,867
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS$1,576
PENN CUMBERLAND GARDEN CLUB$1,100
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$1,000
NEW HOPE MINITRIES$662
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NEW HOPE MINITRIES: $2k → 9%NEW HOPE MINITRIES: $1k → 9%NEW HOPE MINITRIES: $662 → 9%NEW HOPE MINITRIES: $500 → 9%NEW HOPE MINITRIES: $100 → 9%NEW HOPE MINITRIES: $80 → 9%BLOOMSBURG AREA YMCA: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$466k · 14 repeat orgs$91k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
20

Total granted

$466k
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+7%

Still filing today

50%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONINC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $144k · revenue +24%
  • NH
    NEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $4k · revenue +97%
  • VO
    VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • MARCH OF DIMES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -41%
  • WB
    WE BELIEVE IN YOUR CHILD TOO
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • MS
    Main Street Mechanicsburg
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Philadelphia Tourism Marketing Corporation

Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.

Community Improvement
2
The Commonwealth Foundation for Public Policy Alternatives

The commonwealth foundation transforms free-market ideas into public policies, empowering all pennsylvanians to thrive.

Public Benefit
3
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
4
Upmc Williamsport

UPMC Williamsport is a subsidiary of UPMC Susquehanna. The mission of UPMC Susquehanna and its subsidiaries is to serve the community by providing outstanding patient care and shaping tomorrow's health care through clinical and…

Health
5
Doylestown Health Foundation

Doylestown health foundation's mission is to raise funds to support the charitable purposes, programs and activities of doylestown hospital, a related irc section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.

Health
6
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
7
Lycoming College

The mission of lycoming college is to provide a distinguished baccalaureate education in the liberal arts and sciences within a coeducational, supportive, and residential setting.

Education
8
Gettysburg Foundation

We are a 501(c)(3) non-profit philanthropic, educational organization operating in partnership with the national park service (nps) to preserve gettysburg national military park and the eisenhower national historic site, and to educate the…

Arts & Culture
9
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
10
National Wwi Museum and Memorial

The national wwi museum and memorial (museum and memorial) is america's leading institution dedicated to remembering, interpreting and understanding the great war and its enduring impact on the global community. the museum and memorial…

Arts & Culture
11
The German Marshall Fund of the United States

The german marshall fund of the united states (gmf) strives to champion democratic values and the transatlantic alliance by strengthening civil society, forging bold and innovative policy ideas, and developing a new generation of leaders…

International
12
Fort Mifflin On the Delaware

Operation and preservation of fort mifflin

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Gillespie Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRAL PENN EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $137,650 · OtherCENTRAL PENN EDUCATION FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $43,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST JOSEPHS CHURCH: $17,000 · OtherST JOSEPHS CHURCHPENN CUMBERLAND GARDEN CLUB: $13,107 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherCHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION OF GREATER HARRISBURG INC: $10,000 · OtherWE BELIEVE IN YOUR CHILD TOO: $10,000 · Other+13 more: $21,273 · Other+13 moreTHE BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONINC: $144,172 · EducationTHE BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY FOU…+1 more: $2,200 · EducationPENNON ORGANIZATION: $78,500 · Arts & CulturePENNON ORGANIZATIO…GILLESPIE FOUNDATION: $7,000 · Arts & CultureGILLESPIE FOUNDATI…GREY TOWERS HERITGAGE ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · Arts & CultureGREY TOWERS HERITG…BLOOMSBURG AREA YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesNEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $4,342 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,678 · Human ServicesMARCH OF DIMES INC: $10,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 · Health+2 more: $600 · HealthMain Street Mechanicsburg: $10,000 · Community ImprovementDOWNTOWN BLOOMSBURG INC: $5,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY STRATEGIES GROUP: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterMIVO FOUNDATION: $988 · International
Other$265,030Education$146,372Arts & Culture$90,500Human Services$17,020Health$16,600Community Improvement$15,000Housing & Shelter$5,000International$988

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONINC: $144,172 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetPENNON ORGANIZATION: $78,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION OF GREATER HARRISBURG INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMain Street Mechanicsburg: $10,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetGILLESPIE FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetDOWNTOWN BLOOMSBURG INC: $5,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY STRATEGIES GROUP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $4,342 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS: $3,152 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,678 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJOSEPH T SIMPSON PUBLIC LIBRARY: $1,071 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW CUMBERLAND OLDE TOWNE ASSN: $1,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetART FILM FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIVO FOUNDATION: $988 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLIVING BEYOND BREAST CANCER: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the Cap…Community Giving Foun…Ppl FoundationVanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
United Way of the Capital RegionPA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the Capital Region · Community Giving Foundation · Ppl Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Greenly Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Greenly Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Greenly Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home