Skip to content

· Public charity

The Green-Wood Cemetery

THE GREEN-WOOD CEMETERY is a new york historic cemetery.

$58k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$4.3MMembership Benefit$12kPublic Benefit$11kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kEnvironment$6k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $10,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $57,825 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $47,825 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$251M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRESERVATION LEAGUE OF NEW YORK STATE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%NYS CEMETERIES PAC: $11k → 14%HISPANIC FEDERATION INC: $10k → 17%THE GREEN-WOOD HISTORIC FUND INC: $3.6M → 20%PRESERVATION LEAGUE OF NEW YORK STATE: $10k → 14%NEW YORK PRESERVATION ARCHIVE PROJECT: $6k → 17%THE GREEN-WOOD CEMETERY HISTORIC FUND INC: $300k → 20%NEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY: $15k → 17%THE GREEN-WOOD CEMETERY HISTORIC FUND INC: $220k → 20%THE BROOKLYN HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $9k → 20%THE GREEN-WOOD CEMETERY HISTORIC FUND INC: $150k → 20%THE BROOKLYN HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6k → 20%NYS ASSOCIATION OF CEMETERIES INC: $7k → 20%THE BROOKLYN HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5k → 20%NEW YORK ASSOCIATION OF CEMETERIES: $5k → 20%THE BROOKLYN HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5k → 20%BROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN: $6k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 3 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$4.3M
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-10%
+74%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GREEN-WOOD HISTORIC FUND INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $4.2M · revenue +234% · 60% of their budget
  • TB
    THE BROOKLYN HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $26k · revenue -79%
  • NY
    NEW YORK STATE ASSOCIATION OF CEMETERIES INC C/O THE FERNCLIFF CEMETERY
    2× · 2019–2021 · $12k · revenue -10%

Funded once

  • NY
    NEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +10%
  • NC
    NYS CEMETERIES PAC
    one grant, 2018 · $11k
  • HISPANIC FEDERATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +187%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
2
The Trustees of the New York Society Library

The new york society library was founded in 1754 by the new york society, a civic-minded group formed in the belief that the availability of books would help the city of new york to prosper.

—
3
New York Genealogical and Biographical Society

The new york genealogical and biographical society (nyg&b) preserves, documents, and shares the stories of families across the state of new york. we engage with genealogists, biographers, historians, and organizations to establish the…

Education
4
New York City Historic Properties Fund Inc

To provide financial assistance to owners of landmark properties in the five boroughs of the city of new york to ensure the long-term preservation of historic properties.

—
5
Historic House Trust of New York City Inc

The historic house trust of new york city (hht), in partnership with the new york city department of parks & recreation (nyc parks), advocates for, promotes, and provides expertise to preserve 23 publicly owned historic sites in new york…

Arts & Culture
6
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
7
New York Landmarks Preservation Foundation Inc

The new york landmarks preservation foundation was established in 1980 to support the new york city landmarks preservation commission as well as to foster public awareness of preservation through educational outreach. the foundation…

Arts & Culture
8
The Woodlawn Cemetery

As an active cemetery and an important cultural institution, woodlawn memorializes the deceased in thoughtful and dignified ways, provides sensitive and compassionate services to the bereaved; and protects, preserves and enhances the…

—
9
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
10
The Evergreens Cemetery

The evergreens, located in brooklyn, new york is a nonsectarian not-for-profit membership corporation and is a regulated cemetery corporation under the new york state cemetery law. its mission is to sell lots, graves and other space to the…

—
11
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
12
Harvard Club of Ny Historical Foundation
Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Landmarks Conservancy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hispanic Federation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE GREEN-WOOD HISTORIC FUND INC: $4,232,302 · Arts & CultureTHE GREEN-WOOD HISTORIC FUND INC+2 more: $15,950 · Arts & CultureTHE BROOKLYN HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $25,970 · OtherNEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC: $14,560 · OtherNEW YORK STATE ASSOCIATION OF CEMETERIES INC C/O THE FERNCLIFF CEMETERY: $11,775 · OtherNYS CEMETERIES PAC: $10,500 · OtherHISPANIC FEDERATION INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementBROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION: $5,500 · Environment
Arts & Culture$4,248,252Other$62,805Community Improvement$10,000Environment$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GREEN-WOOD HISTORIC FUND INC: $4,232,302 over 4y, 60% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $25,970 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC: $14,560 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW YORK STATE ASSOCIATION OF CEMETERIES INC C/O THE FERNCLIFF CEMETERY: $11,775 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetPRESERVATION LEAGUE OF NEW YORK STATE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Jm Kaplan Fund IncNY13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Jm Kaplan Fund Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Green-Wood Cemetery funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Green-Wood Cemetery. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Green-Wood Cemetery’s filings →

    More from the funding graph