Skip to content
The Green Sklarz Foundation Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

The Green Sklarz Foundation Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$63kEducation$29kHealth$10kAnimals$9kRecreation & Sports$8kCivil Rights$8kPublic Benefit$4kEnvironment$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$19k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE$5,000
ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND$2,500
CAMP RAMAH NEW ENGLAND$540
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER NEW HAVEN: $1k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER NEW HAVEN: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$73k · 13 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
23

Total granted

$73k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+27%

Still filing today

62%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthCivil RightsAnimalsEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • QU
    QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2023 · $16k · revenue +39%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    3× · 2021–2024 · $8k · revenue +34%
  • IC
    ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $6k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • ZP
    Z PAINTED ACRES
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • A
    ADLORG
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • DT
    DOMINATE THE DAY FOUNDATION CORP
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -72%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
The Jewish High School of Connecticut

The jewish high school of connecticut is dedicated to educate jewish youth for whom jewish values and traditions shape and guide their lives and for whom learning and responsible actions are foundational for achievement.

—
3
Connecticut Cancer Foundation Inc

To provide funds to benefit families affected by cancer and to support cancer research and education.

—
4
New Haven Jewish Community Council Housing Corporation D/B/a the Towers

We are a warm and vibrant senior community, infused with jewish values, where people live their best lives.

—
5
United Jewish Federation of Northeastern New York Inc

To build / maintain a strong and united jewish community in order to ensure the continuity of the jewish people. the federation is the central agency for meeting jewish needs and articulating jewish concerns in the capital region, in…

Philanthropy
6
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
7
Jewish Historical Society of Greater New Haven Inc

Founded in 1976 the jewish historical society of greater new haven provides the mission of collecting, publishing, and preserving primary source materials that serve as the central repository for documents, research, and education to…

—
8
American Friends of Rabbinical College Netiv Hadaat Inc

To support, benefit, and assist yeshivat netiv hadaat- jerusalem

Education
9
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
10
Network of Jewish Human Service Agencies Inc

The network is an international membership association of more than 170 non profit human service agencies in the united states, canada and israel. its members provide a full range of human services for the jewish community and beyond,…

Human Services
11
American Friends of Torah and Tefilah Ramat Eshkol Inc

To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.

Religion
12
New York University School of Law Foundation

The foundation, a subsidiary of new york university, fosters legal education and research at new york university's school of law by awarding scholarships, making grants for educational purposes related to law, and supporting programs of…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Foundation of Greater New Haven Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Malala Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
17/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $10,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUCONN LAW SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10,500 · OtherUCONN LAW SCHOOL FOUNDATIONTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC: $7,680 · OtherTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INCCAMP RAMAH NEW ENGLAND: $6,440 · OtherCAMP RAMAH NEW ENGLANDISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $6,300 · OtherISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INCMYSTIC AQUARIUM: $3,000 · OtherZ PAINTED ACRES: $2,500 · OtherADLORG: $2,500 · Other+17 more: $14,453 · Other+17 moreJEWISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC: $55,000 · ReligionJEWISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER NEW HAVEN …QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY: $16,005 · EducationQUINNIPIAC U…+3 more: $780 · EducationANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $7,500 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR TAXPAYER RIGHTS: $3,500 · Civil RightsTHE MARY C SCHANZ FOUNDATION: $3,100 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF THE NEW HAVEN ANIMAL SHELTER: $2,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF ANSONIA NATURE CENTER INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentTHE WOODBRIDGE LAND TRUST INCORPORATED: $1,400 · EnvironmentDOMINATE THE DAY FOUNDATION CORP: $2,500 · Youth Development+1 more: $50 · Youth Development
Other$64,173Religion$55,000Education$16,785Civil Rights$11,000Animals$5,100Environment$3,400Youth Development$2,550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC: $55,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetQUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY: $16,005 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC: $7,680 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $6,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR TAXPAYER RIGHTS: $3,500 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetTHE MARY C SCHANZ FOUNDATION: $3,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDOMINATE THE DAY FOUNDATION CORP: $2,500 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ANSONIA NATURE CENTER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE NEW HAVEN ANIMAL SHELTER: $2,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF GREATER NEW HAV: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOODBRIDGE LAND TRUST INCORPORATED: $1,400 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD CEREBRAL PALSY CAMP INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARTHRITIS NATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOODBRIDGE PARK ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $528 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Broken Umbrella Theatre Inc: $500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTHE MALALA FUND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEZRA ACADEMY OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND LAWBOSTON: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Susan Pechter Cha…The Hagani Foundation…The Linda and Lenny B…The Morris & Sylvia T…Morgan Stanley Global…The Pfizer Foundation…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…
The Susan Pechter Charitable FoundationCT17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Susan Pechter Charitable Foundation · The Hagani Foundation Inc · The Linda and Lenny Bell Family Foundation · The Morris & Sylvia Trachten Family Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Green Sklarz Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Green Sklarz Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • A Broken Umbrella Theatre Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Jewish Federation of Greater New Haven Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Quinnipiac University: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Green Sklarz’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home