Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Grant and Jacqui Smith Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$234k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$834kInternational$250kFood & Nutrition$167kEducation$141kYouth Development$43kHuman Services$25kHealth$25kReligion$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$7,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL$50,000
THE METROPOLITAN OPERA$40,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$20,000
CATAPULT OPERA INC$15,000
CITY HARVEST INC$15,000
CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS$15,000
GENERAL BOARD OF GLOBAL MINISTRIES OF UMC$10,000
METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$10,000
BALLROOM BASIX USA INC$8,500
THEATRE WORKS NEW MILFORD$7,500
WASHINGTON FRIENDS OF MUSIC$7,500
SHERMAN CHAMBER ENSEMBLE$7,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$5,000
SALVATION ARMY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $20k → 8%ON SITE OPERA: $10k → 9%GLIMMERGLASS FESTIVAL: $25k → 13%CITY HARVEST INC: $10k → 17%CITY HARVEST INC: $15k → 20%OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL CAMPAIGN: $50k → 14%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $20k → 8%ON SITE OPERA: $10k → 9%CITY HARVEST INC: $10k → 17%CITY HARVEST INC: $15k → 20%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $20k → 8%ON SITE OPERA: $10k → 9%CITY HARVEST INC: $10k → 17%CITY HARVEST INC: $10k → 20%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $20k → 8%CITY HARVEST INC: $10k → 20%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $20k → 8%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $20k → 8%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $20k → 8%FRICK COLLECTION: $12k → 17%METROPOLITAN OPERA: $75k → 17%METROPOLITAN OPERA: $55k → 17%THE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $40k → 17%THE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $35k → 17%THE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $35k → 17%THE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $35k → 17%METROPOLITAN OPERA: $25k → 17%ON SITE OPERA: $10k → 17%ON SITE OPERA: $10k → 17%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $10k → 17%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $10k → 17%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $10k → 17%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $10k → 17%CATAPULT OPERA INC: $15k → 17%CATAPULT OPERA INC: $15k → 17%NYFABALLROOM BASIX: $9k → 17%CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $15k → 17%CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $15k → 17%CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $10k → 17%CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $10k → 17%CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $10k → 17%CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $10k → 17%CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $10k → 17%MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB: $50k → 17%MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB: $50k → 17%MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB: $50k → 17%MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB: $50k → 17%MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 25 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
2

Total granted

$1.4M
$3k

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureFood & NutritionInternationalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $250k · revenue +35%
  • OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US
    2× · 2024–2025 · $100k · revenue +7%
  • C
    CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $80k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CULINARY SCHOOL OF NORTHWESTERN CONNECTICUT
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Transport Group Inc Dba Transport Group Theatre Company

Producing and developing plays and musicals.

Arts & Culture
2
Metropolitan Opera Association Inc

Performance of opera to the public.

Arts & Culture
3
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
4
New York City Opera

New york city opera was famously dubbed "the people's opera" by mayor fiorello laguardia at its founding in 1943. more than 80 years later, city opera continues its historic mission to inspire audiences with innovative and theatrically…

Arts & Culture
5
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
6
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
7
The New York New Music Ensemble Inc

To commission and perform new music

Arts & Culture
8
Heartbeat Opera Ltd

Grounded in the belief that excellent opera making should build community and radiate beauty, Heartbeat Opera creates incisive adaptations, revelatory arrangements of classics, and interdisciplinary collaboration. We reckon with the…

Arts & Culture
9
New York Public Radio

To make the mind more curious, the heart more open, and the spirit more joyful through excellent audio programming that is deeply rooted in new york.

Arts & Culture
10
New Museum of Contemporary Art

A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.

Arts & Culture
11
San Francisco Opera Association

We believe opera is a uniquely compelling, entertaining and emotionally thrilling art form. our mission is to bring together growing audiences to experience opera's transformative power.

Arts & Culture
12
Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity International Inc D/B/a Opportunity International-Us; the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

METROPOLITAN OPERA: $300,000 · OtherMETROPOLITAN OPERAOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL CAMPAIGN: $150,000 · OtherOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL CAMPAIGNON SITE OPERA INC: $50,000 · OtherON SITE OPERA INCBALLROOM BASIX USA INC: $42,500 · OtherBALLROOM BASIX USA INCGLIMMERGLASS FESTIVAL: $30,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $25,000 · Other+11 more: $117,500 · Other+11 moreMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC: $250,000 · Arts & CultureMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INCMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $40,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ARTCatapult Opera Inc: $30,000 · Arts & CultureCatapult Opera IncTHEATREWORKS NEW MILFORD: $27,500 · Arts & CultureTHEATREWORKS NEW MILFORDSHERMAN CHAMBER ENSEMBLE INC: $27,500 · Arts & CultureSHERMAN CHAMBER ENSEMBLE INCWASHINGTON FRIENDS OF MUSIC INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureWNET: $19,000 · Arts & CultureCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $80,000 · Food & NutritionCITYMEALS-O…CITY HARVEST INC: $80,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVES…Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $140,000 · EducationMassachuse…OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $100,000 · InternationalNORTHWEST CONNECTICUT LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $4,000 · Environment
Other$715,000Arts & Culture$414,000Food & Nutrition$160,000Education$140,000International$100,000Environment$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC: $250,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $140,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $80,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $80,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetON SITE OPERA INC: $50,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetBALLROOM BASIX USA INC: $42,500 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCatapult Opera Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetTHEATREWORKS NEW MILFORD: $27,500 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetSHERMAN CHAMBER ENSEMBLE INC: $27,500 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetThe Frick Collection: $21,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON FRIENDS OF MUSIC INC: $20,000 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetWNET: $19,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRVNAHEALTH INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST CONNECTICUT LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds ON SITE OPERA INC ↗
  • Who funds BALLROOM BASIX USA INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds Catapult Opera Inc ↗
  • Who funds THEATREWORKS NEW MILFORD ↗
  • Who funds SHERMAN CHAMBER ENSEMBLE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Frick Collection ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON FRIENDS OF MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds WNET ↗
  • Who funds RVNAHEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST CONNECTICUT LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Grant and Jacqui Smith Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Grant and Jacqui Smith Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Northwest Connecticut Land Conservancy Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Sherman Chamber Ensemble Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Washington Friends of Music Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Rvnahealth Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Grant and Jacqui Smith Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Grant and Jacqui Smith Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Grant and Jacqui Smith’s filings →

More from the funding graph