Skip to content

· Private foundation

The GoYe Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$123kInternational$72kHuman Services$70kHealth$6kHousing & Shelter$4kEducation$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$207k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Chester County Connect Care$3,000
CRU-Family Life$2,524
Good Works$500
Cedarville University$250
Umbrella Ministries$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Chester County Women' Services: $5k → 6%Chester County Connect Care: $3k → 6%Chester County Women' Services: $3k → 6%Chester County Women' Services: $3k → 6%Chester County Women' Services: $3k → 6%Chester County Connect Care: $3k → 6%Chester County Women' Services: $3k → 6%Chester County Women' Services: $3k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
AZ
AR
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$275k · 15 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +84% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
7

Total granted

$275k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
-12%

Still filing today

40%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $450 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionHousing & ShelterEducationHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHESTER COUNTY CONNECT CARE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $26k · revenue +93%
  • GLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $17k · revenue +84%
  • GH
    GLOBAL HORIZONS INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $14k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • BF
    Black Forest Academy
    one grant, 2019 · $500
  • CC
    CALVARY CHAPEL CHESTER SPRINGS
    one grant, 2018 · $300
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
2
GlobalServant Ministries Inc

Offers counsel, formal & informal teaching served in a pastoral role, mentored groups,filled numerous speaking invitations, conducted discipling groups & provided spiritual, emotional and

Religion
3
Global Faith Network
Human Services
4
Encounter Church

Church

Religion
5
Global Church Partners

Equip churches and pastors with theological training.

Religion
6
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
7
Eurasia Partners Network Inc

To accelerate indigenous, Gospel-centered church-planting movements in Eurasia through coaching, connecting and resourcing, and other strategies to share the Gospel as opportunities arise.

Unclassified
8
Raise Up Global Ministries

Raise Up Global Ministries is committed to educating Christian leaders in communities around the world. The three programs of Raise Up equip the global church by 1 Developing biblically based interactive materials and 2 Training…

—
9
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
10
Training Pastors International

Training pastors in third world countries

Religion
11
Gospel Care Collective

Provide resources for global orphan care

Human Services
12
Leadership Resources International

International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Works Inc; the most unlike its peers is Chester County Connect Care. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRIST FIRST CHURCH: $79,912 · OtherCHRIST FIRST CHURCHSEND INTERNATIONAL INC: $53,000 · OtherSEND INTERNATIONAL INCCRU-Family Life: $44,486 · OtherCRU-Family LifeGLOBAL HORIZONS INC: $14,000 · OtherGLOBAL HORIZONS INCChina Outreach Mission: $10,600 · Other+11 more: $20,790 · Other+11 moreCHESTER COUNTY CONNECT CARE: $25,977 · Human ServicesCHESTER COUN…FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $5,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY RESEA…GLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC: $17,439 · ReligionSUMMIT MISSIONS INC: $3,200 · ReligionGOOD WORKS INC: $4,000 · Housing & ShelterCedarville University: $250 · EducationEDUCATIONAL EQUITY ALLIANCE: $200 · InternationalUmbrella Ministries: $200 · Health
Other$222,788Human Services$31,477Religion$20,639Housing & Shelter$4,000Education$250International$200Health$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHESTER COUNTY CONNECT CARE: $25,977 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetGLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC: $17,439 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL HORIZONS INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $5,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD WORKS INC: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMIT MISSIONS INC: $3,200 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCedarville University: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATIONAL EQUITY ALLIANCE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUmbrella Ministries: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHESTER COUNTY CONNECT CARE ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL HORIZONS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds GOOD WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds SUMMIT MISSIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Cedarville University ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATIONAL EQUITY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Umbrella Ministries ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George E Ley Company FoundationPA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George E Ley Company Foundation · Chester County Community Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The GoYe Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The GoYe Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on GoYe’s filings →

    More from the funding graph