Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Goodrich Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$566kEducation$118kCommunity Improvement$80kHealth$64kArts & Culture$60kAnimals$38kHousing & Shelter$30kFood & Nutrition$21kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$77k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA$10,000
RENAISSANCE SCHOLARSHIPS INC$1,000
PROJECT HORSESHOE FARM$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%GRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$491k · 23 repeat orgs$100k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
16

Total granted

$491k
$99k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+22%

Still filing today

48%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHealthReligionFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +74%
  • IS
    INDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL
    3× · 2017–2022 · $53k · revenue +231%
  • MM
    MAGIC MOMENTS
    7× · 2017–2023 · $14k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • UD
    UAB DEPARTMENT OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • LT
    LYRIC THEATRE
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +134%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uab Educational Foundation

To support the university of alabama at birmingham in its scientific and educational mission, including managing and disbursing funds, acquiring real property, and providing operational flexibility.

Education
2
Alabama Partnership for Children

To work in partnership with families and organizations to ensure that all alabama children (birth to five) get everything they need to develop to their fullest potential.

Education
3
The University Foundation

The university foundation is organized to assist and aid the board of trustees of the university of alabama in fulfilling its educational, research, and public service programs and activities.

4
Alabama a&M University Foundation

The Alabama A&M University Foundation was established to receive, hold, invest, manage, use, and administer property of all kinds, whether given absolutely or in trust, for the benefit of Alabama A&M University and its educational,…

5
Alabama Bankers Association Inc

To promote the preservation and continued development of commercial banking in alabama.

6
Alabama Alliance Network

The alabama alliance netowrk works to strengthen and enhance alabama's civic society through research, education, and grantmaking

Public Benefit
7
Habitat for Humanity of Baldwin County Inc

Habitat for humanity of baldwin county, inc. is an ecumenical, christian housing ministry that seeks to eliminate poverty housing by partnering with the community to make decent shelter a matter of conscience and action.

8
Alabama Rivers Alliance Inc

Alabama Rivers Alliance is a statewide network of groups working to protect and restore all of Alabama's water resources through building partnerships, empowering citizens, and advocating for sound water policy and its enforcement.

Environment
9
Birmingham Museum of Art Endowment Trust

Purpose is to use income produced by the trust to support the operations of bma at the direction of the directors.

Arts & Culture
10
Aids Alabama Inc

Aids alabama devotes its energy and resources statewide to helping people with hiv/aids live healthy, independent lives and works to prevent the spread of hiv.

Health
11
Legal Aid Society of Birmingham

The Organization is a nonprofit community defender providing legal assistance through court appointment to children and other indigent persons.

Crime & Legal
12
The Alabama Center for Law and Civic Education

The mission of ACLCE is to prepare youth to become active, engaged, and informed participants in a democratic society.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birmingham Education Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
12/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC — $483,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INCUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC — $80,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC+2 more — $4,000 · PhilanthropyHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $30,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYUAB O' NEAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER — $21,500 · OtherUAB O' NEAL COMPREHENSIVE…UAB DEPARTMENT OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY — $20,000 · OtherUAB DEPARTMENT OF OTOLARY…BIRMINGHAM MUSEUM OF ART — $18,000 · OtherBIRMINGHAM MUSEUM OF ARTUAB PUBLIC POLICY INITIATIVE — $16,200 · OtherUAB PUBLIC POLICY INITIAT…Individual grant recipient — $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…DIXIE PLANTATION RESEARCH LLC — $15,000 · OtherDIXIE PLANTATION RESEARCH…BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $14,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICALYRIC THEATRE — $12,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF ALABAMA — $11,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF JEMISON PARK — $10,000 · OtherSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $10,000 · Other+13 more — $48,300 · Other+13 moreINDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL — $53,000 · EducationINDIAN SPRI…LINLY HEFLIN UNIT INC — $21,000 · EducationLINLY HEFLI…Teach for America Inc — $19,000 · EducationTeach for A…THE A EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP — $11,000 · EducationTHE A EDUCA…RENAISSANCE SCHOLARSHIPS INC — $4,000 · Education+1 more — $1,000 · EducationWOODLAWN UNITED INC — $80,000 · Community ImprovementBirmingham Zoo Inc — $38,000 · AnimalsCommunity Kitchens of Birmingham — $10,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL ALABAMA — $10,000 · Food & NutritionMAGIC MOMENTS — $14,000 · HealthSOUTH HIGHLAND OUTREACH PROJECT — $4,000 · Health
Philanthropy$567,000Other$241,000Education$109,000Community Improvement$80,000Animals$38,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Health$18,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC — $483,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetWOODLAWN UNITED INC — $80,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC — $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL — $53,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetBirmingham Zoo Inc — $38,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLINLY HEFLIN UNIT INC — $21,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $19,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMAGIC MOMENTS — $14,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTHE A EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP — $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Kitchens of Birmingham — $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF JEMISON PARK — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL ALABAMA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVULCAN PARK FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRENAISSANCE SCHOLARSHIPS INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALABAMA HOLOCAUST EDUCATION CENTER — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIRMINGHAM CIVIL RIGHTS INSTITUTE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HORSESHOE FARM — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRMINGHAM EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC
  • Who funds WOODLAWN UNITED INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC
  • Who funds INDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL
  • Who funds Birmingham Zoo Inc
  • Who funds LINLY HEFLIN UNIT INC
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc
  • Who funds MAGIC MOMENTS
  • Who funds THE A EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds Community Kitchens of Birmingham
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF JEMISON PARK
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL ALABAMA
  • Who funds VULCAN PARK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds RENAISSANCE SCHOLARSHIPS INC
  • Who funds SOUTH HIGHLAND OUTREACH PROJECT
  • Who funds WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA
  • Who funds ALABAMA HOLOCAUST EDUCATION CENTER
  • Who funds BIRMINGHAM CIVIL RIGHTS INSTITUTE
  • Who funds PROJECT HORSESHOE FARM
  • Who funds BIRMINGHAM EDUCATION FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Protective Life FoundationAL34.5× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Protective Life Foundation · Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust · Mike and Gillian Goodrich Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Robert R Meyer Foundation · Altecstyslinger Foundation · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Jones Family Fund · Dunn-French Foundation · Hill Crest Foundation Inc · The Hugh Kaul Foundation · The Hackney Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Goodrich Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph