Loading…
· Public charity
THE GLENDA G MORGAN CHARITABLE
The organization is operated for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, and to carry out the purposes of its supported organizations.
$310k
Granted FY2024
9
Grants
1
Communities
$68k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of THE GLENDA G MORGAN CHARITABLE’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
thousandministrylife-changing
2019
thousandministrylife-changing
2020
thousandministrylife-changing
2021
roots
2022
roots
2023
roots
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 9 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k7 grants · $156k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
$25,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
- SOCIAL ENTERPRISE FUND$68,045
- OTHER DOMESTIC PROJECTS$61,529
- UCF FOUNDATION$37,600
- ELEVATION SCHOLARS$32,500
- SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC$25,500
- EVERY KIDS OUTREACH$25,000
- FLORIDA FELLOWSHIP FOUNDATION$15,390
- 4ROOTS$10,000
- ELEVATE ORLANDO$10,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $445k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.1M · 12 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else
12 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
12
0
Total granted
$3.1M
$0
Still filing today
75%
0%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
PhilanthropyInternationalHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ESELEVATION SCHOLARS8× · 2017–2024 · $445k · revenue +554%
- UPUCF PROGRAMS8× · 2017–2024 · $337k · revenue +31%
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC8× · 2017–2024 · $310k · revenue +40%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Sustainable Harvest International
Helps farming families in central america preserve tropical forest and overcome poverty.
Environment
2
Harvesting 4 Haiti Foundation
Help haitian agriculture initiatives become self-sustaining by providing financial & business assistance, thereby reducing poverty through long-term development.
International
3
University of Florida Leadership
The foundation is organized and shall be operated exclusively to receive, hold, invest, and administer property and to make expenditures to or for the benefit of the university of florida. more specifically, the foundation is organized to…
Public Benefit
4
Florida Certified Organic Growers
Florida certified organic growers and consumers, inc. (fog) supports and promotes organic, regenerative, and sustainable agriculture.
Food & Nutrition
5
Feed the Hunger Fund
Provide entrepreneurs with access to capital, technical assistance & networks to increase their income & build assets.
International
6
Opportunities for All Floridians Inc
Opportunity For All Floridians advocates for hardworking Floridians by championing economic policies that put people over profits ensuring that everyday residents benefit more than large corporations and special interests. We are committed…
Civil Rights
7
Capital Roots Inc
We cultivate and nourish communities by creating equitable access to fresh food and green spaces in support of a robust regional food system.
Environment
8
International Faith Missions
Aid to destitute in haiti
International
9
Florida Community Loan Fund Inc
To provide loans and technical assistance to nonprofit ormission-focused for-profit organizations to develop affordable housing,supportive housing (which includes social services for residents),community facilities, and economic…
Community Improvement
10
Florida Memorial University Inc
Higher education
Education
11
World Hunger Relief Institute
World hunger relief institute equips people to alleviate hunger through education, research, and sustainable agriculture.
International
12
Foundation for Rural Education
To help ensure the achievement of academic excellence and career opportunities for rural students in north east florida.
Education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Second Harvest Food Bank of and the most unlike its peers is Thousand Hills Ministry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$1,314,258International$633,956Human Services$445,157Education$336,755Philanthropy$224,890Environment$57,442Youth Development$40,000Religion$20,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EVERY KIDS OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL ENTERPRISE FUND ↗
- Who funds ELEVATION SCHOLARS ↗
- Who funds UCF PROGRAMS ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA FELLOWSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds 4ROOTS ↗
- Who funds AIR ↗
- Who funds ELEVATE ORLANDO ↗
- Who funds THOUSAND HILLS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation THE GLENDA G MORGAN CHARITABLE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SOCIAL ENTERPRISE FUND.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~7 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 9 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
9 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 260431935 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on SOCIAL ENTERPRISE FUND, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 7 months of cash on hand.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 71% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to The Glenda G Morgan Charitable?
Find your warmest path to The Glenda G Morgan Charitable through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines