· Private foundation
The Gilreath Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SUSTAINING WAY | $10,000 |
| GREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| SEEDS OF HOPE CHILDREN'S OUTREACH | $10,000 |
| A CHILD'S HAVEN | $10,000 |
| SAFE HARBOR INC | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +114% since the first grant, against +46% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SHSAFE HARBOR INC3× · 2020–2025 · $43k · revenue +182%
- SWSUSTAINING WAY4× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +121%
- MVMILL VILLAGE MINISTRIES2× · 2018–2022 · $30k · revenue +114%
Funded once
- RUREBUILD UPSTATEone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +17%
- IHI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue -43%
- AFALLIANCE FOR THE COLLABORATION WITH THE HISPANIC COMMUNITYgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +80%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of Communities In Schools is to surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.
We provide training, coaching, community supports and access to leading colorado employers enabling coloradans to acheive economic security, mobility and prosperity.
To advance students' economic and social mobility by improving public education.
Equal opportunity schools' mission is to strengthen educator and system leader capacity to break down barriers to increase access, belonging, and success in rigorous college and career-prep secondary school courses for students of color…
Youthbuild pcs seeks to transform the lives of disconnected youth by offering a program, in english and spanish, that combines rigorous academic instruction with vocational training, life and employability skills- building, and community…
Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…
Livewell greenville's mission is to increase access to healthy foods and active living opportunities by convening community members and partners to impact policies, systems, and environmental changes.
Strives to permanently break the cycle of poverty for philadelphia families
The mission of united way of lewis county (uwlc) is connecting people and resources to improve the quality of life in lewis county. uwlc has evolved from its roots as a fundraising organization to a critical community impact organization…
Sustainable, generational change in under-resourced communities has proven difficult to achieve. greenhouse is changing that paradigm by working from within partnering with the most inspiring young leaders and surrounding them with a…
To advance an economically just region where prosperity is shared across race and ethnicity.
The mission of Georgia Appleseed is to keep children in school and on a path to success by providing legal services and representation, leading law and policy reform, growing a statewide community of advocates, and collaborating with…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Child's Haven Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Family Effect. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds REBUILD UPSTATE ↗
- Who funds SAFE HARBOR INC ↗
- Who funds GREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds A Child's Haven Inc ↗
- Who funds SUSTAINING WAY ↗
- Who funds MILL VILLAGE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds YOUTHBASE INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC EDUCATION PARTNERS GREENVILLE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR THE COLLABORATION WITH THE HISPANIC COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds ANCHOR HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Atlanta Speech School Inc ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY EFFECT ↗
- Who funds IMPACT ON EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds LAKES AND BRIDGES CHARTER SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Must Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC ↗
- Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Scansource Charitable Foundation · The Jolley Foundation · Scsymmes Foundation · Daniel-Mickel Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · United Way of Greenville County Inc · Dabo's All in Team Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of South Carolina · Hollingsworth Funds Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Local Boys Do Good · Sisk Foundation Buncombe St Methodist Church
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Gilreath Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Anchor House Inc — 45% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.