Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gerald & Suzanne Ganse Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$309k
Granted FY2022
9
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$299k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Religion$321kEducation$45kHuman Services$23kFood & Nutrition$10kArts & Culture$9kInternational$5kEnvironment$4kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2022 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k8 grants · $10k
  • $250k+1 grant · $299k
$1,200
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DIOCESE OF HARRISBURG$299,279
LANCASTER CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
LANCASTER CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$1,666
ST ANNE'S RETIREMENT COMMUNITY$1,200
EAGLES MERE AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION$1,000
A WOMAN'S CONCERN$1,000
SULLIVAN COUNTY VICTIM SERVICES$250
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AMIGOS DE JESUS: $300 → 7%PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR LIVING: $5k → 9%OFF THE STREETS: $2k → 9%Off the streets: $500 → 9%ST ANNE'S RETIREMENT COMMUNITY: $5k → 9%ST ANNE'S RETIREMENT COMMUNITY: $2k → 9%ST ANNE'S RETIREMENT COMMUNITY: $2k → 9%ST ANNE'S RETIREMENT COMMUNITY: $1k → 9%ST ANNE'S RETIREMENT COMMUNITY: $200 → 9%ST ANNE'S RETIREMENT COMMUNITY: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
NE
MD
DC
MS
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 68% of The Gerald & Suzanne Ganse Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Gerald & Suzanne Ganse Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

21%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$93k · 27 repeat orgs$350k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2022, 20 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
42

Total granted

$93k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+22%

Still filing today

33%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $299k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyEnvironmentHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    ST ANNE'S RETIREMENT COMMUNITYINC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $11k · revenue +44%
  • AW
    A WOMAN'S CONCERN INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $6k · revenue +77%
  • EM
    EAGLES MERE CONSERVANCY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $3k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • CE
    CATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • RC
    RESURRECTION CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • HT
    Hands Together Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Allegheny Lutheran Social Ministries Inc

To serve people through a ministry of love, compassion, and mercy in the name of our lord, jesus christ.

Human Services
2
Little Sisters of the Poor of Pa

The home is part of the international congregation of the little sisters of the poor, which was founded in france in 1839 & serves the elderly in 31 countries. the st. peter and paul home, which provides nursing & residential care for the…

Human Services
3
Elan Gardens Inc Elan Senior Living a Jewish Senior Life

Care and shelter for the elderly

Housing & Shelter
4
Pocono Heritage Land Trust

The trust is dedicated to protecting the natural heritage of the pocono mountains region, in northeastern pennsylvaina, by conserving land and inspiring people to care for, enjoy, and explore their natural world.

Environment
5
Saint Joseph Villa

The mission of saint joseph villa is rooted in the mission of the sisters of st. joseph who founded and sponsor the villa. the sisters' mission of uniting people with god and with one another is the primary focus of the staff at the villa.…

—
6
Jewish Home of Eastern Pennsylvania Elan Skilled Nursing and Rehab

To provide skilled nursing care for the elderly

Health
7
Lancaster Emergency Medical Services Association

To provide comprehensive, skillful, cost effective emergency and non- emergency health care services to the lancaster community while continuing to evolve with changing health care needs.

Health
8
Pennsylvania Medical Society Charitable Trust Fka Fdn of the Pa Medical Society

The foundation of the pennsylvania medical society charitable trust is dedicated to advancing the culture of philanthropy and supporting excellence across programs and services provided by the foundation of the pennsylvania medical society.

Health
9
Scranton-Lackawanna Resources Development Corporation

To provide affordable housing to people of lackawanna county

Human Services
10
Seven Mountains Emergency Medical Services Council Inc

The council is a key component of the emergency medical services system in central pennsylvania, serving as a vital link between local ems agencies and the pennsylvania department of health. as a independent non-profit corporation and the…

Health
11
Delaware County Historical Society

Acquire and preserve property and information of historic value and/or interest concerning delaware county, pennsylvania. the society also operates a research library and museum.

Arts & Culture
12
Lancaster Equity Inc

Lancaster equity coordinates efforts to advance communities where everyone has an opportunity to thrive, whether that be through neighborhood revitalization, living wage work, entrepreneurship, or safe and affordable housing.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Servants Inc; the most unlike its peers is Smarthub Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
17/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DIOCESE OF HARRISBURG: $299,279 · OtherDIOCESE OF HARRISBURGST ANNE'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $21,519 · OtherST ANNE'S CATHOLIC CHURCHLANCASTER CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $16,390 · Other+54 more: $64,417 · Other+54 moreST ANNE'S RETIREMENT COMMUNITYINC: $10,730 · Human ServicesPHI: $4,800 · Human ServicesOFF THE STREETS MIDDLETOWN INC: $2,500 · Human Services+1 more: $300 · Human ServicesA WOMAN'S CONCERN INC: $5,950 · HealthOUR LADY OF DIVINE PROVIDENCE HOUSE OF PRAYER FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropySERVANTS INC: $500 · PhilanthropyHands Together Inc: $5,000 · InternationalEAGLES MERE CONSERVANCY: $3,000 · EnvironmentLANCASTER COUNTY CONSERVANCY: $1,000 · EnvironmentEAGLES MERE FRIENDS OF THE ARTS: $2,000 · Arts & CultureSMARTHUB FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $200 · Arts & Culture
Other$401,605Human Services$18,330Health$5,950Philanthropy$5,500International$5,000Environment$4,000Arts & Culture$3,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST ANNE'S RETIREMENT COMMUNITYINC: $10,730 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetA WOMAN'S CONCERN INC: $5,950 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHands Together Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOUR LADY OF DIVINE PROVIDENCE HOUSE OF PRAYER FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPHI: $4,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLES MERE CONSERVANCY: $3,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetEAGLES MERE FRIENDS OF THE ARTS: $2,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE NEW SCHOOL OF LANCASTER DBA NEW SCHOOL MONTESSORI: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLES MERE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLANCASTER COUNTY CONSERVANCY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EAGLES MERE FOUNDATION: $750 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSERVANTS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCABRINI LEGACY CORPORATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSULLIVAN COUNTY VICTIM SERVICES INC: $350 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmigos de Jesus: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLYCOMING COUNTY SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJONI AND FRIENDS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMusic for Everyone: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLES MERE HISTORIC VILLAGE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST ANNE'S RETIREMENT COMMUNITYINC ↗
  • Who funds A WOMAN'S CONCERN INC ↗
  • Who funds Hands Together Inc ↗
  • Who funds OUR LADY OF DIVINE PROVIDENCE HOUSE OF PRAYER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PHI ↗
  • Who funds EAGLES MERE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds OFF THE STREETS MIDDLETOWN INC ↗
  • Who funds EAGLES MERE FRIENDS OF THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW SCHOOL OF LANCASTER DBA NEW SCHOOL MONTESSORI ↗
  • Who funds SMARTHUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EAGLES MERE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER COUNTY CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE EAGLES MERE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SERVANTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lancaster County Community FoundationPA21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lancaster County Community Foundation · Andrew R & Dorothy L Cochrane Foundation · Susan Bailey & Sidney Buford Scott Endowment Trust · Dicarlo Plank Foundation · Clark Associates Charitable Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gerald & Suzanne Ganse Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gerald & Suzanne Ganse Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gerald & Suzanne Ganse Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph