Skip to content
The George H Nettleton Home Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The George H Nettleton Home Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$306k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$61k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$1.0MHealth$301kHousing & Shelter$160kFood & Nutrition$154kCrime & Legal$68kCommunity Improvement$20kMembership Benefit$2k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $234k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TNC COMMUNITY$61,297
SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF NORTHLAND$37,500
SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF KC KANSAS$35,000
REBUILDING TOGETHER$30,000
PHOENIX FAMILY HOUSING CORP$29,667
LEGAL AID OF WESTERN MISSOURI$25,000
HOPE BUILDERS$20,000
DENTAL LIFELINE NETWORK$17,000
GIVING THE BASICS$15,000
GUADELUPE CENTER$15,000
TRUE LIGHT FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER$10,000
MID-AMERICA REGIONAL COUNCIL$5,000
ELBERT C COLE JR LEGACY AWARD$5,000
ELMWOOD CEMETERY SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $314k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMERICAN STROKE FOUNDATION: $30k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 5%LAKEVIEW VILLAGE: $5k → 5%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $5k → 5%KANSAS CITY HOSPICE: $20k → 15%TNC COMMUNITY: $61k → 15%TNC COMMUNITY: $56k → 15%DON BOSCO CENTER: $40k → 15%TRUE LIGHT FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 15%GUADALUPE CENTER: $20k → 15%GUADELUPE CENTER: $15k → 15%JOHN KNOX VILLAGE: $27k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 21 repeat orgs$563k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
25

Total granted

$1.2M
$518k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+7%

Still filing today

62%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEmploymentEnvironmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HARRY S TRUMAN CHILDREN'S NEUROLOGICAL CENTER
    2× · 2022–2024 · $117k · revenue +47%
  • TP
    THE PHOENIX FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION
    3× · 2021–2024 · $75k · revenue +36%
  • LA
    Legal Aid of Western Missouri
    3× · 2021–2024 · $68k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • A
    ALPHAPOINTE
    one grant, 2020 · $45k · revenue +2%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $42k
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Villa St Francis Catholic Care Center Inc

Villa st francis, a catholic, non-profit skilled nursing facility sponsored by the archdiocese of kansas city in olathe, provides dementia care, skilled nursing, respite, and hospice.

Housing & Shelter
2
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
3
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
4
Kansas City Community Land Trust

Acquire and develop real estate to provide safe, decent, and affordable housing to low-income homeowners while working to ensure a culturally, ethnically, and economically diverse and stable community where generations can thrive in place.

Housing & Shelter
5
Kanza Mental Health and Guidance Center Inc

Offer hope to build a better tomorrow through mental health services.

Health
6
Community Health Center of Se Kansas Inc

To provide quality, affordable, accessible medical, dental and behavioral health care to anyone regardless of ability to pay.

Health
7
Catholic Community Hospice of Northeast Kansas Inc

The organization provides hospice care services within the archdiocese of kansas city in kansas as well as the greater metropolitan areas of kansas city, kansas and kansas city, missouri.

—
8
Kansas Affordable Housing Corporation

Provide support for mennonite housing rehabilitation services, inc., which provides low-income housing for the elderly and disabled through hud housing programs that provide low-income families with ownership opportunities and the…

Housing & Shelter
9
Lutheran Senior Citizens Inc

Concordia life plan community is a not-for-profit lutheran organization committed to upholding christian values while meeting the current and continuing needs of seniors of all beliefs in a safe, secure, and caring environment.

Housing & Shelter
10
Kansas Legal Services Inc

Kansas legal services is devoted to helping low income kansans meet their basic needs through the provision of important legal and mediation services.

—
11
Interfaith Housing and Community Service

To assist low-income homeowners of south central kansas to repair/rehabilitate their homes; to assist qualified low-income residents of south central kansas to purchase homes or to build low-cost homes for these residents; and to provide…

Community Improvement
12
Kansas Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kansas City Community Gardens Inc; the most unlike its peers is Elmwood Cemetery Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
16/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Seton Center Inc: $125,000 · OtherSeton Center IncSHEPHERD'S CENTER OF NORTHLAND: $97,875 · OtherSHEPHERD'S CENTER OF NORTHLANDSHEPHERD'S CENTER OF KC KANSAS: $95,000 · OtherSHEPHERD'S CENTER OF KC KANSASTHE PHOENIX FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $74,885 · OtherTHE PHOENIX FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATIONSHEPHERD'S CENTER OF CENTRAL KC: $60,000 · OtherSHEPHERD'S CENTER OF CENTRAL KCIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKC COMMUNITY GARDENS: $50,000 · OtherHOPE BUILDERS: $50,000 · OtherMETROPOLITAN LUTHERAN MINISTRY: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $42,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $40,000 · OtherJerusalem Farm: $40,000 · Other+20 more: $322,060 · Other+20 moreHARRY S TRUMAN CHILDREN'S NEUROLOGICAL CENTER: $116,817 · Human ServicesHARRY S TRUMAN CHILD…THE DON BOSCO CENTERS: $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE DON BOSCO CENTER…GUADALUPE CENTERS INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesGUADALUPE CENTERS IN…AMERICAN STROKE FOUNDATION: $30,447 · Human ServicesAMERICAN STROKE FOUN…JOHN KNOX VILLAGE: $26,679 · Human ServicesJOHN KNOX VILLAGEJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $24,800 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVIC…Kansas City Hospice Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesKansas City Hospice …+3 more: $20,000 · Human Services+3 moreHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $59,300 · Food & NutritionKANBE'S MARKETS: $25,000 · Food & NutritionMERCY & TRUTH HEALTHCARE MINISTRY INC: $46,200 · HealthDENTAL LIFELINE NETWORK: $32,000 · HealthLegal Aid of Western Missouri: $68,000 · Crime & LegalALPHAPOINTE: $45,300 · EmploymentST MICHAEL'S VETERANS CENTER INC: $45,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,101,820Human Services$313,743Food & Nutrition$84,300Health$78,200Crime & Legal$68,000Employment$45,300Housing & Shelter$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSeton Center Inc: $125,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetHARRY S TRUMAN CHILDREN'S NEUROLOGICAL CENTER: $116,817 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE PHOENIX FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $74,885 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetLegal Aid of Western Missouri: $68,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $59,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY & TRUTH HEALTHCARE MINISTRY INC: $46,200 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetALPHAPOINTE: $45,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN LUTHERAN MINISTRY: $45,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetST MICHAEL'S VETERANS CENTER INC: $45,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetJerusalem Farm: $40,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetTHE DON BOSCO CENTERS: $40,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetGUADALUPE CENTERS INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDENTAL LIFELINE NETWORK: $32,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetAMERICAN STROKE FOUNDATION: $30,447 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetGIVING THE BASICS INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJOHN KNOX VILLAGE: $26,679 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKANBE'S MARKETS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $24,800 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKANSAS CITY COMMUNITY GARDENS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFront Porch Alliance - Kansas City Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetKansas City Hospice Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFamily Health Care Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTrue Light Family Resource Center: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKEVIEW VILLAGE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELMWOOD CEMETERY SOCIETY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City C…Health Forward Founda…United Way of Greater…The Sunderland Founda…Oppenstein Brothers F…Menorah Heritage Foun…The H & R Block Found…Servant FoundationIna Calkins TrustJohn W and Effie E Sp…R a Long Foundation 6…Marion and Henry Bloc…
Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO38.1× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Health Forward Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · The Sunderland Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · Menorah Heritage Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · Servant Foundation · Ina Calkins Trust · John W and Effie E Speas Memorial Trust · R a Long Foundation 600 Plaza West Bldg · Marion and Henry Bloch Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The George H Nettleton Home Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The George H Nettleton Home Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The George H Nettleton Home Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The George H Nettleton Home Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on George H Nettleton Home’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home