· Private foundation
The George H Nettleton Home Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $234k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TNC COMMUNITY | $61,297 |
| SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF NORTHLAND | $37,500 |
| SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF KC KANSAS | $35,000 |
| REBUILDING TOGETHER | $30,000 |
| PHOENIX FAMILY HOUSING CORP | $29,667 |
| LEGAL AID OF WESTERN MISSOURI | $25,000 |
| HOPE BUILDERS | $20,000 |
| DENTAL LIFELINE NETWORK | $17,000 |
| GIVING THE BASICS | $15,000 |
| GUADELUPE CENTER | $15,000 |
| TRUE LIGHT FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER | $10,000 |
| MID-AMERICA REGIONAL COUNCIL | $5,000 |
| ELBERT C COLE JR LEGACY AWARD | $5,000 |
| ELMWOOD CEMETERY SOCIETY | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $314k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HSHARRY S TRUMAN CHILDREN'S NEUROLOGICAL CENTER2× · 2022–2024 · $117k · revenue +47%
- TPTHE PHOENIX FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION3× · 2021–2024 · $75k · revenue +36%
- LALegal Aid of Western Missouri3× · 2021–2024 · $68k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- AALPHAPOINTEone grant, 2020 · $45k · revenue +2%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $42k
- JFJEWISH FAMILY SERVICESone grant, 2023 · $40k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Villa st francis, a catholic, non-profit skilled nursing facility sponsored by the archdiocese of kansas city in olathe, provides dementia care, skilled nursing, respite, and hospice.
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
Acquire and develop real estate to provide safe, decent, and affordable housing to low-income homeowners while working to ensure a culturally, ethnically, and economically diverse and stable community where generations can thrive in place.
Offer hope to build a better tomorrow through mental health services.
To provide quality, affordable, accessible medical, dental and behavioral health care to anyone regardless of ability to pay.
The organization provides hospice care services within the archdiocese of kansas city in kansas as well as the greater metropolitan areas of kansas city, kansas and kansas city, missouri.
Provide support for mennonite housing rehabilitation services, inc., which provides low-income housing for the elderly and disabled through hud housing programs that provide low-income families with ownership opportunities and the…
Concordia life plan community is a not-for-profit lutheran organization committed to upholding christian values while meeting the current and continuing needs of seniors of all beliefs in a safe, secure, and caring environment.
Kansas legal services is devoted to helping low income kansans meet their basic needs through the provision of important legal and mediation services.
To assist low-income homeowners of south central kansas to repair/rehabilitate their homes; to assist qualified low-income residents of south central kansas to purchase homes or to build low-cost homes for these residents; and to provide…
Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kansas City Community Gardens Inc and the most unlike its peers is Elmwood Cemetery Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Seton Center Inc ↗
- Who funds HARRY S TRUMAN CHILDREN'S NEUROLOGICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE PHOENIX FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Legal Aid of Western Missouri ↗
- Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
- Who funds MERCY & TRUTH HEALTHCARE MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds ALPHAPOINTE ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN LUTHERAN MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds ST MICHAEL'S VETERANS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Jerusalem Farm ↗
- Who funds THE DON BOSCO CENTERS ↗
- Who funds GUADALUPE CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds DENTAL LIFELINE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN STROKE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GIVING THE BASICS INC ↗
- Who funds JOHN KNOX VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds KANBE'S MARKETS ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CITY COMMUNITY GARDENS INC ↗
- Who funds Front Porch Alliance - Kansas City Inc ↗
- Who funds Kansas City Hospice Inc ↗
- Who funds Family Health Care Inc ↗
- Who funds True Light Family Resource Center ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Health Forward Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · The Sunderland Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · Menorah Heritage Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · Servant Foundation · Ina Calkins Trust · John W and Effie E Speas Memorial Trust · R a Long Foundation 600 Plaza West Bldg · Marion and Henry Bloch Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The George H Nettleton Home Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The George H Nettleton Home Inc?
Find your warmest path to The George H Nettleton Home Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.