Skip to content

· Private foundation

The George & Wilma Leonard Charitable Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$708k
Granted FY2026still arriving
48
Grants FY2026still arriving
13
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$4.4MReligion$999kHealth$351kHuman Services$268kFood & Nutrition$260kPhilanthropy$250kHousing & Shelter$177kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kOther$0
02FY2026 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k29 grants · $106k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $272k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $330k
$6,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$8.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$150,000
MACALESTER COLLEGE$100,000
FOOTHILLS CHURCH$80,000
SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY$30,000
SANTA MARIA URBAN MINISTRY$30,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$25,000
CASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION$25,000
COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY$25,000
KQED INC (NORTHERN CA PUBLIC BROADCASTING)$20,000
FOOTHILLS CHURCH$20,000
SARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$15,000
MVLA HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT$12,000
SWARTHMORE COLLEGE$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
MACALESTER COLLEGE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $305k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $25k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $25k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $25k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $25k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $25k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $25k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $25k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $20k → 8%Community Services Agency: $20k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $20k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $20k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $10k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
OH
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.2M · 70 repeat orgs$264k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against -10% for those funded once.

70 repeat relationships: 40 still active in FY2026, 30 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

70
16

Total granted

$7.2M
$219k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
-10%

Still filing today

47%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MACALESTER COLLEGE
    7× · 2020–2026 · $665k · revenue +69%
  • CS
    COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $265k · revenue +131%
  • CS
    CASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2019–2026 · $124k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • MC
    MACALESTER COLLEGE (ROSENBERG SCHOLARSHIP FUND)
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • FC
    FOOTHILLS CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $49k
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS (UNRESTRICTED)
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
6
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
7
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
11
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
12
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College; the most unlike its peers is Bus Barn Stage Company. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
34/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MACALESTER COLLEGE DEVELOPMENT OFFICE: $2,545,971 · OtherMACALESTER COLLEGE DEVELOPMENT OFFICEFOOTHILLS CHURCH: $512,300 · OtherFOOTHILLS CHURCHHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $285,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYSANTA MARIA URBAN MINISTRY: $275,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $260,000 · Other+59 more: $1,446,000 · Other+59 moreMACALESTER COLLEGE: $665,000 · EducationMACALESTER COLLEGEPACIFIC SCHOOL OF RELIGION: $528,750 · EducationPACIFIC SCHOOL OF RELI…CASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $124,000 · EducationCASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUN…WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $52,000 · Education+11 more: $143,500 · Education+11 moreCOMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC: $265,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $50,000 · Human ServicesDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $250,000 · PhilanthropyFOOTHILL-DEANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGES FOUNDATION: $40,000 · PhilanthropyCANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION: $95,000 · HealthLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $50,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $9,000 · HealthSARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $61,000 · Arts & CultureTHE EXPLORATORIUM: $36,000 · Arts & CultureCOMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM: $9,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $50,000 · International
Other$5,324,271Education$1,513,250Human Services$315,000Philanthropy$290,000Health$154,000Arts & Culture$111,000International$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMACALESTER COLLEGE: $665,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPACIFIC SCHOOL OF RELIGION: $528,750 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC: $265,000 over 10y, 0.7% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $250,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $124,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION: $95,000 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetSARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $61,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $52,000 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetSILICON VALLEY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL: $52,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc: $52,000 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFOOTHILL-DEANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGES FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE EXPLORATORIUM: $36,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCARLETON COLLEGE: $29,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS HEART OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA: $29,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $19,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMID-PENINSULA EDUCATION CENTER INC: $15,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRose-Hulman Institute of Technology: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC: $13,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 55 SILICON VALLEY MONTEREY BAY COUNCIL: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KEHILLAH SCHOOL: $12,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM: $9,000 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetHarvey Mudd College: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $9,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MORNING FORUM OF LOS ALTOS: $7,500 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GIRLS' MIDDLE SCHOOL: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBus Barn Stage Company: $3,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF CALIFORNIA: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOOK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetKIPP FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN JOSE CHILDRENS MUSICAL THEATER: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MACALESTER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC SCHOOL OF RELIGION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC ↗
  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds CASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SILICON VALLEY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Electronic Frontier Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds LUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOTHILL-DEANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE EXPLORATORIUM ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA24.2× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The Intuit Foundation · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Bright Funds Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · United Way Worldwide · The Valley Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The George & Wilma Leonard Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The George & Wilma Leonard Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The George & Wilma Leonard Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The George & Wilma Leonard Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 92 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on George & Wilma Leonard’s filings →

    More from the funding graph