Skip to content

· Private foundation

The George and Mariamma Thomas Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$30kReligion$15kHousing & Shelter$13kHuman Services$8kYouth Development$3kHealth$2kPhilanthropy$1kScience & Tech$1k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$188k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Nassau Foundation$5,000
Turning Points$3,000
Visible Men Academy$2,000
Catholic Charities Diocese of Venice$2,000
Society of St Vincent De Paul$1,000
St Thomas Syro-Malabar Catholic Diocese of Chicago$1,000
Community Pregnancy Clinics$1,000
Knights of Columbus$1,000
Boys and Girls Club$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Catholic Charities Diocese of Venice Inc: $2k → 9%Catholic Charities Diocese of Venice: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$59k · 7 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +2% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$59k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
0%

Still filing today

71%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of South Florida Foundation Inc
    4× · 2020–2024 · $7k · revenue +58%
  • VM
    VISIBLE MEN ACADEMY INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $6k · revenue +2%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MANATEE COUNTYINC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -26%
  • BG
    Boys & Girls Club of Manatee
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities Housing Diocese of Venice Inc

Catholic charities housing, diocese of venice, inc. was formed as a not-for-profit corporation under the laws of the state of florida in august 2003, for the purposes of providing a residential program for men living with hiv and who are…

—
2
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
3
Flagler Health Care Foundation Inc

The organization's mission is to support uf health promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the…

Health
4
The Florida International University Health Care Network Inc

Fiu health care network's mission is to improve and support medical education at the fiu herbert wertheim college of medicine and provide clinical support services to the larger fiu community.

—
5
Flagler Hospital Inc

As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…

Health
6
Florida International University Foundation Inc

To encourage, solicit, receive and administer gifts and bequests of property and funds for scientific, educational and charitable purposes, all for the advancement of florida international university and its objectives (see schedule o for…

Education
7
Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation Inc

To advance florida gulf coast university and its students by promoting the institution, securing philanthropy to support the needs of the university, managing and administering assets with a long term perspective, and providing resources…

Education
8
The Womens Care Florida Foundation
—
9
Volusiaflagler County Coalition for the Homeless Inc

Charitable or educational purposes related to services for persons experiencing homelessness and persons at risk of homelessness in the service area. in pursuance of the foregoing purposes, vfcch shall facilitate and coordinate the…

Human Services
10
University of Miami
—
11
The Florida Medical Clinic Foundation of Caring Inc

Florida medical clinic foundation of caring strives to support individuals, children, and families in need throughout hillsborough and pasco counties. continued on schedule o.florida medical clinic foundation of caring strives to support…

Health
12
Grace Medical Home Foundation Inc

The Organization supports and furthers the interests of Grace Medical Home, Inc., a Florida not-for-profit corporation that is exempt from federal income tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Organization operates…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Coalition on Homelessness dba Turning Points; the most unlike its peers is The Louis and Gloria Flanzer Philanthropic Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Nassau Foundation Inc: $12,000 · OtherThe Nassau Foundation IncSt Joseph's catholic School: $11,000 · OtherSt Joseph's catholic SchoolCARDINAL MOONEY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INC: $6,000 · OtherCARDINAL MOONEY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $2,000 · Other+9 more: $8,500 · Other+9 moreUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc: $7,000 · EducationUniversity of South …VISIBLE MEN ACADEMY INC: $6,000 · EducationVISIBLE MEN ACADEMY …Community Coalition on Homelessness dba Turning Points: $12,500 · Housing & ShelterCommunity Coalition…CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MANATEE COUNTYINC: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentWe Care Manatee Inc: $1,000 · HealthTHE LOUIS AND GLORIA FLANZER PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$39,500Education$13,000Housing & Shelter$12,500Human Services$4,000Youth Development$1,000Health$1,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCommunity Coalition on Homelessness dba Turning Points: $12,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Nassau Foundation Inc: $12,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVISIBLE MEN ACADEMY INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY PREGNANCY CLINICS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MANATEE COUNTYINC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWe Care Manatee Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE LOUIS AND GLORIA FLANZER PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Community Coalition on Homelessness dba Turning Points ↗
  • Who funds The Nassau Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds University of South Florida Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds VISIBLE MEN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PREGNANCY CLINICS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MANATEE COUNTYINC ↗
  • Who funds We Care Manatee Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE LOUIS AND GLORIA FLANZER PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co IncFL19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Manatee Community Foundation Inc · Vernon G & Sandra Jc Buchanan Family Foundation · The Mary Parker Foundation 157823-000 · The Louis and Gloria Flanzer Philanthropic Trust · Msc Foundation Inc · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The George and Mariamma Thomas Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The George and Mariamma Thomas Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on George and Mariamma Thomas’ filings →

    More from the funding graph