Skip to content

Connecticut · Private foundation

The Gw Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$400k
Granted FY2020
5
Grants FY2020
5
Organizations funded FY2020
60%
First-time grantees FY2020
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

64% of The Gw Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Community Foundation Of Broward Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year The Gw Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $400k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’17
3
’18
1
’19
5
’20
1
’21
1
’22
1
’23
3
’24
3
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2020
$100,000
Largest grant, FY2020
$100,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 5
FY2017 to FY2020
States reached, FY2020
3
Total assets, FY2020
$27M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2020, 60% of the organizations The Gw Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 63% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20
EducationEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20205$400k60%
FY20191$385k0%
FY20183$350k67%
FY20171$360kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.4MYouth Development$1.2MPhilanthropy$707kHealth$125kArts & Culture$100kEnvironment$100k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($145k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

The Gw Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 9 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Wisconsin Foundation: $1,725,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Stamford Inc: $721,000 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetFlorida Polytechnic University Foundation Inc: $632,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Broward County Inc: $499,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetThe Everglades Foundation Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBroward Performing Arts Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetStamford Center for the Arts Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSlow Burn Theatre Company Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBerkshire Medical Center Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Gw Foundation with peer funders

About The Gw Foundation

How much does The Gw Foundation give?
The Gw Foundation reported 5 grants totaling $400,000 in its FY2020 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 5 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2020.
What does The Gw Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (51%), Youth Development (26%), Philanthropy (15%).
Who are The Gw Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: University of Wisconsin Foundation ($1.7M), Boys & Girls Club of Stamford Inc ($721k), Florida Polytechnic University Foundation Inc ($632k).
Does The Gw Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2020, 60% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Gw Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Gw Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is The Gw Foundation based?
The Gw Foundation is based in CT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gw’s filings →

More from the funding graph