Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gw Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$400k
Granted FY2020
5
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

64% of The Gw Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Community Foundation Of Broward Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year The Gw Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $400k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’17
3
’18
1
’19
5
’20
1
’21
1
’22
1
’23
3
’24
3
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.4MYouth Development$1.2MPhilanthropy$707kHealth$125kArts & Culture$100kEnvironment$100k
02FY2020 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$100,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BROWARD COUNTY$100,000
THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION$100,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF STAMFORD$50,000
BROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 45% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%Berkshire Medical Center: $25k → 12%WENDT FAMILY PHILANTHROPIC FUND: $45k → 17%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BROWARD: $662k → 13%THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION: $100k → 15%FLORIDA POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $632k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $500k → 10%Boys and Girls Club of Stamford: $385k → 9%Boys and Girls Club of Broward County: $360k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $375k → 10%STAMFORD CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $15k → 9%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BROWARD COUNTY: $100k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $320k → 10%Boys and Girls Club of Stamford: $286k → 9%Boys and Girls Club of Broward County: $39k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $230k → 10%STAMFORD CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $10k → 9%BROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION: $50k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $200k → 10%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF STAMFORD: $50k → 9%SLOW BURN THEATRE COMPANY INC: $25k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $100k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 25% of The Gw Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Gw Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 4 repeat orgs$977k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2020, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
1

Total granted

$3.0M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+53%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $170k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +29%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF STAMFORD INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $721k · revenue +53%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $499k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • BM
    BERKSHIRE MEDICAL CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
2
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
3
Bard College

Bard college seeks to provide a challenging academic program and a supportive environment that fosters a collaborative interchange of ideas in the classroom as well as ambition to achieve excellence.

Education
4
Florida Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc

Working in partnership with state business leaders to secure florida's future.

—
5
Boys & Girls Clubs of Lee County

To enable all young people, especially those who need us the most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
6
The Broad Institute Inc

The mission of the broad institute is to propel progress in biomedicine, through research aimed at the understanding and treatment of disease and the dissemination of scientific knowledge to the scientific community to benefit the public.…

Health
7
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
8
Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc

To enhance the quality of life for all residents now and for future generations; to build permanent endowments, to provide community leadership on relevant issues, and to address needs through grantmaking. as part of our strategic plan,…

Philanthropy
9
The Brookings Institution

The brookings institution (brookings) is a nonprofit public policy organization that conducts in-depth, independent research that leads to new ideas for solving problems facing society at the local, national, and global level.…

Social Science
10
Tampa Bay Performing Arts Center Inc

To inspire, educate and connect our community through the power of shared performing arts experiences.see schedule o for the organization's expanded mission.

—
11
Savannah College of Art and DesignInc

Scad prepares talented students for creative professions through engaged teaching and learning in a positively oriented university environment.

Education
12
Fairfield University

To establish, organize, maintain and conduct an institution for secondary, undergraduate and graduate education in the state of connecticut, and to perform such other works of education, charity and religion. see schedule o.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Broward County Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Everglades Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $1,725,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATIONFLORIDA POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $632,000 · EducationFLORIDA POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF STAMFORD INC: $721,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF S…CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUND…BROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · OtherBROWARD PERFORMING ART…WENDT FAMILY PHILANTHROPIC FUND: $45,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BROWARD INC: $662,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDA…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $499,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS…THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · EnvironmentSTAMFORD CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureSLOW BURN THEATRE COMPANY INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureBERKSHIRE MEDICAL CENTER INC: $25,000 · Health
Education$2,357,000Other$916,000Philanthropy$662,000Youth Development$499,000Environment$100,000Arts & Culture$50,000Health$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $1,725,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF STAMFORD INC: $721,000 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BROWARD INC: $662,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFLORIDA POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $632,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $499,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSTAMFORD CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSLOW BURN THEATRE COMPANY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBERKSHIRE MEDICAL CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gw Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gw Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Boys & Girls Club of Stamford Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Stamford Center for the Arts Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gw’s filings →

More from the funding graph