Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Gary & Connie Kunis Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$211k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$654kAnimals$352kArts & Culture$169kEnvironment$63kHealth$50kInternational$44kHousing & Shelter$6kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$11,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY$100,000
SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY-SEAS$46,000
WOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$20,000
BOZEMAN SYMPHONY SOCIETY$12,832
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SINGAPORE MANAGEMENT UNIVERSIT$11,500
SEATTLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$10,000
SEATTLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC$6,466
SEATTLE ART MUSEUM$3,000
JASON RITCHIE MEMORIAL HOCKEY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATI$500
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $750) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $250 → 14%VINE MAPLE PLACE: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MT
IL
NY
SD
CA
VA
MD
DC
LA
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 40 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

40 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
17

Total granted

$1.3M
$86k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+22%

Still filing today

65%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationAnimalsInternationalHealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $223k · revenue +70%
  • WP
    WOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $102k · revenue +36%
  • BS
    BOZEMAN SYMPHONY SOCIETY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $98k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • AA
    AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ZOO KEEPERS
    one grant, 2021 · $39k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE SEATTLE PUBLIC LIBRARYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +74%
  • SM
    SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
2
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
3
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
4
Washington Coast Sustainable Salmon Foundation

The foundation board is comprised of members with diverse backgrounds and expertise who devote their shared commitment and passion to collectively support protection and restoration of the washington coast region salmon by providing…

Animals
5
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
6
Oregon Symphony Association

The oregon symphony is dedicated to moving music forward. our vision is bold and adventurous: to inspire audiences with exhilarating performances, present the best musicians in a wide range of styles, explore new art forms, shine light on…

Arts & Culture
7
Earth & Space Research

Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.

Science & Tech
8
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
9
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
10
Fremont Arts Council

The Fremont Arts Council (FAC) is a Seattle-based community arts organization founded in 1979. The FAC cultivates creativity, celebration, and belonging by engaging people of all backgrounds as active participants in the arts. We produce…

Arts & Culture
11
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
12
Metropolitan Museum of Art

The metropolitan museum of art collects, studies, conserves, and presents significant works of art across all times and cultures in order to connect people to creativity, knowledge, and ideas.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Public Library Foundation and the most unlike its peers is American Computer Museum Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Environmental Conservation …Public Library OperationsCommunity FoundationsCommunity College Foundatio…Community Arts CentersElementary Literacy TutoringDomestic Violence ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsFood Banks and PantriesLocal History Museums
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr18%24%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr15%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr18%14%20–35yr13%48%35–55yr15%37%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/48
the rest of the field
12%
4,745/38,920

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
29/41
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY — $395,000 · OtherBINGHAMTON UNIVERSITYBOZEMAN SYMPHONY SOCIETY — $97,889 · OtherBOZEMAN SYMPHONY SOCIETYNORTH SEATTLE COLLEGE — $54,250 · OtherNORTH SEATTLE COLLEGESEATTLE ZOO (WOODLAND PARK) — $47,800 · OtherSEATTLE ZOO (WOODLAND PARK)SEATTLE PUBLIC LIBRARY — $46,800 · OtherSEATTLE PUBLIC LIBRARYSEATTLE UNIVERSITY — $40,000 · OtherAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ZOO KEEPERS — $39,450 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SINGAPORE MANAGEMENT UNIVERSIT — $35,500 · Other+25 more — $51,500 · Other+25 moreTHE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY — $223,310 · AnimalsTHE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIET…WOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $102,100 · AnimalsWOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SO…+2 more — $2,100 · AnimalsSEATTLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $65,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE SEATTLE PUBLIC LIBRARY — $20,000 · EducationSEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Education+5 more — $3,840 · EducationSEATTLE ART MUSEUM — $27,700 · Arts & CultureMONTANA CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY — $21,070 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $6,466 · Arts & CultureBAROQUE MUSIC MONTANA INC — $6,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF MONTANA SHAKESPEARE IN THE PARKS — $3,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more — $2,700 · Arts & CultureSWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $30,000 · HealthKIN ON HEALTH CARE CENTER — $10,000 · HealthINTERNATIONAL YOUTH FOUNDATION — $7,000 · InternationalHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC — $1,500 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $900 · InternationalFeeding America — $3,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$808,189Animals$327,510Education$93,840Arts & Culture$66,936Health$40,000International$9,400Food & Nutrition$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY — $223,310 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $102,100 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBOZEMAN SYMPHONY SOCIETY — $97,889 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetSEATTLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $65,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSEATTLE UNIVERSITY — $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE ART MUSEUM — $27,700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMONTANA CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY — $21,070 over 4y, 8.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE SEATTLE PUBLIC LIBRARY — $20,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetKIN ON HEALTH CARE CENTER — $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL YOUTH FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAROQUE MUSIC MONTANA INC — $6,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE ROCKIES INC — $5,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFoundation for the Seattle Colleges — $5,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetFeeding America — $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF MONTANA SHAKESPEARE IN THE PARKS — $3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCOCOON HOUSE — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTREASURE STATE FOUNDATION — $2,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $1,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMontana State University Foundation Inc — $1,790 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRoots of Music Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKing County Library System Foundation — $950 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS WASHINGTON — $900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVINE MAPLE PLACE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY — $500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JASON RITCHIE MEMORIAL HOCKEY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOZEMAN LIBRARY FRIENDS AND FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Computer Museum LTD — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOZEMAN ART MUSEUM — $450 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELLEVUE ART MUSEUM — $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAVEN — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE20.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Montana Community Foundation Inc · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Morton H Meyerson Family Foundation · United Way of King County · Gilhousen Family Foundation · Gianforte Family Charitable Trust · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · The Norcliffe Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Gary & Connie Kunis Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 17%
  • International Youth Foundation17% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Gary & Connie Kunis Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Gary & Connie Kunis Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph