Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Gambill Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$280k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$62k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Religion$189kFood & Nutrition$47kYouth Development$43kRecreation & Sports$23kHealth$22kPhilanthropy$16kHuman Services$13kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $155k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $112k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAKEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH (CHECK NO 131 PAID 122425)$62,112
LAKEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH (CHECK NO 121 PAID 91025)$50,000
ST PAUL'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH (CHECK NO 126 PAID 110425)$30,000
GOOD SAMARITAN FOOD MINISTRY (CHECK NO 120 PAID 9525)$25,000
THUMBS UP MISSION (CHECK NO 127 PAID 111325)$20,000
GOOD SAMARITAN FOOD MINISTRY (CHECK NO 129 PAID 111925)$20,000
THUMBS UP MISSION (CHECK NO 124 PAID 102025)$20,000
CAMP LIGHTHOUSE (CHECK NO 125 PAID 111025)$10,000
CAMP LIGHTHOUSE (CHECK NO 123 PAID 91225)$10,000
CHATTAHOOCHEE BAPTIST ASSOCIATION (CHECK NO 128 PAID 111925)$10,000
THE KEATON FRANKLIN COKER FOUNDATION (CHECK NO 114 PAID 22425)$10,000
GOOD NEWS CLINIC (CHECK NO 122 PAID 9925)$5,000
CAMP LIGHTHOUSE (CHECK NO 119 PAID 52925)$3,000
COOPER'S CREW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION NE GEORGIA (CHECK NO 117 PAID 61325)$3,000
NO FRILLS PICKLE BALL FUNDRAISER (CHECK NO 115 PAID 32125)$1,200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RANDY & FRIENDS INC: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

15%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$57k · 7 repeat orgs$311k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +169% since the first grant, against -28% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
9

Total granted

$57k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+169%
-28%

Still filing today

29%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $280k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $29k
  • PF
    PARTNERSHIP FOR GYNECOLOGICAL CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $11k
  • GN
    GOOD NEWS CLINICS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $6k · revenue -40%

Funded once

  • TK
    THE KEATON F COKER FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -64%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • NG
    NORTH GEORGIA WORKS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +22%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
2/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LAKEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH (CHECK NO 131 PAID 122425) — $62,112 · OtherLAKEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH (CHECK NO 131 PAID 122425)LAKEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH (CHECK NO 121 PAID 91025) — $50,000 · OtherLAKEWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH (CHECK NO 121 PAID 91025)ST PAUL'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH (CHECK NO 126 PAID 110425) — $30,000 · OtherST PAUL'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH (CHECK NO 126 PAID 110425)GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES — $28,500 · OtherGOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIESGOOD SAMARITAN FOOD MINISTRY (CHECK NO 120 PAID 9525) — $25,000 · OtherGOOD SAMARITAN FOOD MINISTRY (CHECK NO 120 PAID 9525)THUMBS UP MISSION (CHECK NO 127 PAID 111325) — $20,000 · OtherTHUMBS UP MISSION (CHECK NO 127 PAID 111325)GOOD SAMARITAN FOOD MINISTRY (CHECK NO 129 PAID 111925) — $20,000 · OtherGOOD SAMARITAN FOOD MINISTRY (CHECK NO 129 PAID 111925)THUMBS UP MISSION (CHECK NO 124 PAID 102025) — $20,000 · OtherTHUMBS UP MISSION (CHECK NO 124 PAID 102025)+17 more — $77,400 · Other+17 moreTHE KEATON F COKER FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesNORTH GEORGIA WORKS INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesBLOOM ENTERPRISES OF GA INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $5,000 · ReligionNORTH GEORGIA WALK TO EMMAUS INC — $3,000 · ReligionGOOD NEWS CLINICS INC — $6,000 · HealthCamp Lighthouse Ministry Inc — $3,000 · Youth Development
Other$333,012Human Services$18,000Religion$8,000Health$6,000Youth Development$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE KEATON F COKER FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGOOD NEWS CLINICS INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH GEORGIA WORKS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCamp Lighthouse Ministry Inc — $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNORTH GEORGIA WALK TO EMMAUS INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBLOOM ENTERPRISES OF GA INC — $3,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE KEATON F COKER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GOOD NEWS CLINICS INC
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds NORTH GEORGIA WORKS INC
  • Who funds Camp Lighthouse Ministry Inc
  • Who funds NORTH GEORGIA WALK TO EMMAUS INC
  • Who funds BLOOM ENTERPRISES OF GA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

North Georgia Community Foundation IncGA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: North Georgia Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Gambill Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph