Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Gail & Michael Rosenberg Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$11kHuman Services$11kPhilanthropy$5kArts & Culture$2kHealth$1kEducation$1kYouth Development$100International$100Other$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$11k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FELS EARLY LEARNING SERVICES$1,100
MMRF$500
Individual grant recipient$500
CONGREGATION RODEPH SHALOM$500
Individual grant recipient$150
FOOD TRUST$50
MLRT RHODI FAMILY$50
Individual grant recipient$50
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ABRAMSON SENIOR CARE FOUNDATION: $60 → 7%FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES: $3k → 22%FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES: $2k → 22%FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES: $2k → 22%FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES: $2k → 22%FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES: $1k → 22%FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES: $1k → 22%FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES: $1k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$25k · 5 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
13

Total granted

$25k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+10%

Still filing today

40%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionPhilanthropyAnimalsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RS
    RODEPH SHALOM CONGREGATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $11k
  • FD
    FEDERATION DAY CARE SERVICES D/B/A FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES
    7× · 2017–2023 · $11k · revenue -89%
  • PM
    PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF JEWISH ART
    2× · 2017–2020 · $2k

Funded once

  • THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $600 · revenue -31%
  • CC
    CB COMMUNITY SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2020 · $250 · revenue -17%
  • CT
    CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $125 · revenue +10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
2
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
3
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
4
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
5
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
6
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
7
Jewish Communal Fund

To facilitate and promote philanthropy through donor advised funds.

Philanthropy
8
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

9
Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh

Our vision is a flourishing jewish community where everyone feels included, supported and inspired. in order to accomplish this vision we cultivate resources, connect people and collaborate across the community to live and fulfill jewish…

Philanthropy
10
Jewish Food Society Inc

Jewish food society works to preserve and celebrate jewish culinary heritage from around the world in order to increase awareness and deepen connections to jewish life. jfs is committed to showcasing the diversity of the jewish experience,…

Arts & Culture
11
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
12
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Federation Day Care Services D/B/a Federation Early Learning Services and the most unlike its peers is The Food Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RODEPH SHALOM CONGREGATION — $11,390 · OtherRODEPH SHALOM CONGREGATIONPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF JEWISH ART — $1,600 · OtherPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF JEWISH ARTFELS EARLY LEARNING SERVICES — $1,100 · OtherFELS EARLY LEARNING SERVICES+13 more — $2,250 · Other+13 moreFEDERATION DAY CARE SERVICES D/B/A FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES — $11,250 · Human ServicesFEDERATION DAY CARE SERVICES D/B/A FED…+1 more — $60 · Human ServicesJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $3,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERAT…UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $800 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH …THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $600 · HealthCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION — $125 · HealthCB COMMUNITY SCHOOLS — $250 · EducationBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $100 · InternationalTHE FOOD TRUST — $50 · Food & NutritionZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA — $25 · Animals
Other$16,340Human Services$11,310Philanthropy$4,300Health$725Education$250International$100Food & Nutrition$50Animals$25

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFEDERATION DAY CARE SERVICES D/B/A FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES — $11,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCB COMMUNITY SCHOOLS — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION — $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABRAMSON SENIOR CARE FOUNDATION — $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD TRUST — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FEDERATION DAY CARE SERVICES D/B/A FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CB COMMUNITY SCHOOLS
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ABRAMSON SENIOR CARE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE FOOD TRUST
  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Gail & Michael Rosenberg Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Gail & Michael Rosenberg Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Gail & Michael Rosenberg Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph