· Private foundation
The Fuchs Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $7k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $103k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $717k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $167,000 |
| THE HONEY FOUNDATION FOR ISRAEL | $100,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY | $100,000 |
| CANARY MISSION | $100,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA ISRAEL INC | $50,000 |
| FIDF - FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES | $50,000 |
| BELEV ECHAD | $50,000 |
| AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TEL AVIV INSS | $50,000 |
| IMPACT ISRAEL | $25,000 |
| MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER | $25,000 |
| THE GARY AND VIVIENNE PLAYER FOUNDATION | $22,500 |
| THE ISRAEL ADVOCACY GROUP | $10,000 |
| SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK | $10,000 |
| SILVER HILL HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $294k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
36 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $273k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JMJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc7× · 2018–2025 · $503k · revenue +35%
- IIIMPACTISRAEL INC4× · 2022–2025 · $165k · revenue +45%
- FFFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc4× · 2020–2024 · $148k · revenue +117%
Funded once
- CFCentral Fund of Israelgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +31%
- FOFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INCone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
- AIAMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEEgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $53k · revenue +113%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.
Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.
The principal and primary intent of the organization is to support kohelet policy forum (the "forum"), a jerusalem-based non-profit policy center founded in 2012, comprised of leading academics and researchers.
To promote and support the rambam health care campus-the premier medical center in northern israel.
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
To promote and foster the creation of a zionist intellectual infrastructure for the state of israel, the development of a jewish national culture, and the establishment and promotion of intellectual and economic liberty.
To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.
Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…
To further jewish education in israel
We fundraise in the u.s. to support, and raise awareness of, bar-ilan university in israel.
To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Inspirica Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BELEV ECHAD INC ↗
- Who funds IMPACTISRAEL INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
- Who funds Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
- Who funds THE ISRAEL ADVOCACY GROUP ↗
- Who funds GOODWIN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds SHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA ISRAEL INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds HANDS ON TZEDAKAH INC ↗
- Who funds Nicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation ↗
- Who funds PINK AID INC ↗
- Who funds CHORDOMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds LEHIGH UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF IR DAVID INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds GARY AND VIVIENNE PLAYER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PBC ↗
- Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Lundberg Family Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Synchrony Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Fuchs Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Inspirica Inc — 30% of income from government
- Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation — 2% of income from government
- Jewish Home for the Elderly of Fairfield County Inc — 0% of income from government
- Silver Hill Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.