Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Fry Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$695k
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$236k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.2MCivil Rights$836kEnvironment$469kHuman Services$257kRecreation & Sports$232kYouth Development$142kFood & Nutrition$121kCommunity Improvement$118kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $185k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $436k
$7,566
Median grant
4
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY$235,716
Individual grant recipient$139,964
ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION COMMISSION$60,525
COLLEGE OF NORTH ATLANTIC$38,584
GIRLS INC OF SANTA FE$30,000
COMMUNITY CENTER ALLIANCE$26,682
CROSSOVER MISSION$25,000
THE HAVEN$24,000
SALVATION ARMY$18,914
SHAW FESTIVAL$11,348
ORCA$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,550
NSO Orchestral Chairs Program$7,566
BAY ROBERTS HERITAGE SOCIETY$7,566
NL Sexual Assault Crisis Ctr$7,566
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 25% of grant dollars ($1.2M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 75% that went abroad ($3.7M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $836k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE HAVEN: $313k → 9%THE HAVEN: $307k → 9%THE HAVEN: $101k → 9%THE HAVEN: $53k → 9%THE HAVEN: $24k → 9%THE HAVEN: $14k → 9%THE HAVEN: $13k → 9%THE HAVEN: $13k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 75% of all-years giving ($3.7M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$3.7M · 108 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.4M · 32 repeat orgs$417k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
15

Total granted

$4.4M
$386k

Still filing today

19%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Community Haven For Adults And Children With Disabilities Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $836k · revenue +130%
  • GI
    GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $60k · revenue +193%
  • ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $27k · revenue +150%

Funded once

  • GH
    Government House Newfoundland
    one grant, 2023 · $112k
  • TR
    THE ROOMS CORPORATION
    one grant, 2019 · $92k
  • MU
    MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND
    one grant, 2020 · $71k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY: $1,054,365 · OtherMEMORIAL UNIVERSITYCOLLEGE OF NORTH ATLANTIC: $463,219 · OtherCOLLEGE OF NORTH ATLANTICIndividual grant recipient: $336,695 · OtherIndividual grant recipientENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION COMMISSION: $283,275 · OtherENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION COMMISSIONSALVATION ARMY: $273,050 · OtherSALVATION ARMYMARINE INSTITUTE OF MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND: $241,593 · OtherMARINE INSTITUTE OF MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLANDCOMMUNITY CENTER ALLIANCE: $143,284 · OtherCOMMUNITY CENTER ALLIANCE CCA: $137,892 · Other+39 more: $903,415 · Other+39 moreCommunity Haven For Adults And Children With Disabilities Inc: $836,152 · Human ServicesCommunity Haven For…GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentCROSSOVER MISSION INC: $55,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INC: $20,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC: $26,600 · Food & Nutrition
Other$3,836,788Human Services$836,152Youth Development$136,000Food & Nutrition$26,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCommunity Haven For Adults And Children With Disabilities Inc: $836,152 over 8y, 8.1% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC: $60,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetCROSSOVER MISSION INC: $55,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC: $26,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYWCA NORTHERN NEW JERSEY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetelevateHER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Community Haven For Adults And Children With Disabilities Inc ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSOVER MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds YWCA NORTHERN NEW JERSEY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Fry Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Fry Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 42%
  • Ywca Northern New Jersey: 42% of income from government
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Fry Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Fry Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fry Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph