Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Freeman Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$231k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Health$639kReligion$258kEducation$111kPhilanthropy$67kInternational$20kHousing & Shelter$10kFood & Nutrition$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $99k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $101k
$4,250
Median grant
8
States reached
$734k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SONIA NABETA FOUNDATION$101,060
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$35,000
ST LAWRENCE CATHOLIC CHURCH$30,000
ACADEMY PREP CENTER OF TAMPA$20,000
ST PATRICKS CATHOLIC CHURCH$13,650
METRO MINISTRIES$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BACK 2 BACK MINISTRIES$5,000
CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ST PETERSBURG$4,250
CHRIST THE KING CHURCH$3,000
FRANCISCAN MISSIONS$2,500
AGAINST MALARIA FOUNDATION$2,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$1,015
SALESIAN YOUTH CENTER TAMPA$1,000
ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
NY
OH
CA
MO
KY
VA
AZ
NC
SC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$995k · 23 repeat orgs$196k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
24

Total granted

$995k
$175k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+17%

Still filing today

30%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationInternationalFood & NutritionReligionAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SONIA NABETA FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $477k · revenue +123%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    4× · 2021–2024 · $144k · revenue +35%
  • AP
    ACADEMY PREP CENTER OF TAMPA INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $55k
  • CI
    CARITAS IN VERITATE - CIV USA
    one grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue -12%
  • MC
    MAYFIELD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
3
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
4
American Board of Medical Specialties

In collaboration with its member boards, abms creates standards for board certification for physicians and medical specialists. specifically, for initial and continuing certification. abms and its member boards establish rigorous standards…

5
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
6
Alzheimer's Impact Movement

To advance and develop policies to overcome alzheimer's and all other dementia through increased investment in research, enhanced care and improved support.

Health
7
Mila's Miracle Foundation

The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…

Health
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
10
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
11
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
12
Tampa Bay Partnership Inc

The tampa bay partnership is a privately funded, ceo-driven regional advocacy organization, committed to creating a unified, competitive and prosperous tampa bay.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blue Moon Eclipse Aftercare. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE SONIA NABETA FOUNDATION — $477,071 · InternationalTHE SONIA NABETA FOUNDATIONST LAWRENCE CATHOLIC CHURCH — $149,597 · OtherST LAWRENCE CATHOLIC CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $55,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientACADEMY PREP — $54,000 · OtherACADEMY PREPMAYFIELD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 · OtherMAYFIELD COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONCHRIST THE KING CHURCH — $15,450 · Other+34 more — $159,464 · Other+34 moreBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $144,010 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T…+6 more — $8,295 · Health+6 moreACADEMY PREP CENTER OF TAMPA INC — $40,000 · Education+1 more — $1,000 · EducationCARITAS IN VERITATE - CIV USA — $35,000 · PhilanthropyBack 2 Back Ministries Inc — $17,040 · ReligionMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC — $10,000 · Human Services
International$477,071Other$458,611Health$152,305Education$41,000Philanthropy$35,000Religion$17,040Human Services$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SONIA NABETA FOUNDATION — $477,071 over 5y, 13% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $144,010 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetACADEMY PREP CENTER OF TAMPA INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCARITAS IN VERITATE - CIV USA — $35,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetBack 2 Back Ministries Inc — $17,040 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECTIONS FOR MENTAL HEALTH INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Against Malaria Foundation — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTAMPA BAY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $2,515 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF TAMPA FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAVE MARIA UNIVERSITY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $530 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE MOON ECLIPSE AFTERCARE — $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SONIA NABETA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D
  • Who funds ACADEMY PREP CENTER OF TAMPA INC
  • Who funds CARITAS IN VERITATE - CIV USA
  • Who funds Back 2 Back Ministries Inc
  • Who funds DIRECTIONS FOR MENTAL HEALTH INC
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC
  • Who funds The Against Malaria Foundation
  • Who funds TAMPA BAY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF TAMPA FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sbj Resch Family Foundation IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sbj Resch Family Foundation Inc · Pinellas Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Freeman Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Academy Prep Center of Tampa Inc3% of income from government
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc2% of income from government
  • Directions for Mental Health Inc1% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc0% of income from government
  • Ave Maria University Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph