Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Fredric E Steck Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$102kFood & Nutrition$78kHealth$65kReligion$29kArts & Culture$27kRecreation & Sports$13kHousing & Shelter$5kInternational$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$901k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Share Our Strength$6,000
KQED$5,000
Braden James Fund$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
OH
CT
CA
UT
CO
NC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$135k · 7 repeat orgs$198k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
17

Total granted

$135k
$198k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+11%

Still filing today

43%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsEducationArts & CultureFood & NutritionSocial ScienceHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SHARE OUR STRENGTH
    3× · 2021–2025 · $51k · revenue -38%
  • KI
    KQED INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $26k · revenue +10%
  • RS
    ROSS SCHOOL
    4× · 2021–2024 · $25k

Funded once

  • UF
    UCSB FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $60k
  • BI
    Buck Institute on Aging
    one grant, 2022 · $35k
  • BI
    BUCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON AGING
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue -18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
2
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
3
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
4
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
5
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
6
The Governors of the University of Calgary

The University of Calgary is a global intellectual hub located in Canada's most enterprising city. In this spirited, high quality learning environment students will thrive in programs made rich by research, hands-on experiences and…

—
7
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
8
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
9
California Agricultural Leadership Found

To enhance the long-term viability of california agriculture through leadership development, which in turn benefits the people and communities that agriculture serves. we grow leaders who make a difference.

Food & Nutrition
10
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
11
Califonia State University East Bay Foundation Inc

Csu east bay foundation is an auxiliary organization of california state university east bay and the california state university system. the organization's mission is to provide services that aid, supplement, and advance the educational…

Education
12
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Adopt a Family of Marin; the most unlike its peers is Feeding the Valley Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UCSB FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherUCSB FOUNDATIONSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $51,000 · OtherSHARE OUR STRENGTHBuck Institute on Aging: $35,000 · OtherBuck Institute on AgingROSS SCHOOL: $25,000 · OtherROSS SCHOOLChrist Church: $12,000 · OtherChrist ChurchCHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherMeals on Wheels SF: $10,000 · Other+7 more: $19,950 · Other+7 moreBUCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON AGING: $30,000 · Social ScienceBUCK INSTI…KQED INC: $26,000 · Arts & CultureFeeding the Valley Inc: $17,000 · Food & NutritionCAL POLY CORPORATION: $12,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $5,000 · EducationCOLORADO AVALANCHE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsNorth Bay Youth Soccer League: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsWEST COAST EQUINE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsBUILDON INC: $5,000 · InternationalPEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE: $2,500 · Human Services
Other$222,950Social Science$30,000Arts & Culture$26,000Food & Nutrition$17,000Education$17,000Recreation & Sports$12,000International$5,000Human Services$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $51,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBUCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON AGING: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $26,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding the Valley Inc: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAL POLY CORPORATION: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO AVALANCHE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetBUILDON INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADOPT A FAMILY OF MARIN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNorth Bay Youth Soccer League: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEST COAST EQUINE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds BUCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding the Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds CAL POLY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO AVALANCHE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BUILDON INC ↗
  • Who funds ADOPT A FAMILY OF MARIN ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE ↗
  • Who funds North Bay Youth Soccer League ↗
  • Who funds WEST COAST EQUINE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA9.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Fredric E Steck Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Fredric E Steck Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fredric E Steck Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph