Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Fredric and Lundy Reynolds Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$294k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$149k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$3.6MFood & Nutrition$369kInternational$339kEnvironment$210kPhilanthropy$155kEducation$145kHuman Services$124kArts & Culture$33kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $249k
$100,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SHUL$149,380
CONGREGATION B'NAI B'RITH$100,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$30,000
GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $124k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO: $50k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO: $37k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO: $20k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MD
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of The Fredric and Lundy Reynolds Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Fredric and Lundy Reynolds Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.4M · 20 repeat orgs$775k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
30

Total granted

$4.4M
$775k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+25%

Still filing today

35%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionInternationalEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $145k · revenue +77%
  • SI
    SISKIYOU INITIATIVE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $128k · revenue +27%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $124k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • MO
    MIKVEH OF EAST DENVER INC
    one grant, 2021 · $275k
  • CC
    COVENANT CONSERVATION CORP
    one grant, 2022 · $210k
  • WC
    WORLD CENTER KITCHEN
    one grant, 2022 · $75k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
3
Hand in Hand American Friends of the Center for Jewish-Arab Education in Isra

To promote partnership and coexistence among jewish and arab citizens of israel by providing support for integrated schools and providing funding for and assisting in program development in connection with israeli nonprofits with similar…

International
4
Better Future for Israel

To strengthen israel's future in these areas: 1)providing new immigrants with assistance in a few key areas: representing them as they navigate government ministries and assisting them with their challenges as new immigrants to israel.…

Philanthropy
5
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
6
Sherit Isroel
—
7
Jewish Federation of Southern Arizona

Jewish philanthropies of southern arizona (jpsa) is committed to achieving the full potential of jewish philanthropy, now and for future generations. comprised of jewish federation of southern arizona (jfsa or federation) and jewish…

Philanthropy
8
The Jewish Federation of Sarasota-Manatee Inc

To strengthen jewish life and identity in our community, provide for jewish people in need and promote support for israel.

Philanthropy
9
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
10
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

—
11
University of Judaism Foundation
—
12
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Society for Yad Vashem Inc; the most unlike its peers is Southwest Wildlife Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE EMANUEL: $1,811,534 · OtherTEMPLE EMANUELCONGREGATION BNAI BRITH: $848,910 · OtherCONGREGATION BNAI BRITHIndividual grant recipient: $425,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMIKVEH OF EAST DENVER INC: $275,000 · OtherMIKVEH OF EAST DENVER INCMENACHEM BASIS OF DENVER: $261,680 · OtherMENACHEM BASIS OF DENVERSHUL OF BAL HARBOUR INC: $246,920 · OtherSHUL OF BAL HARBOUR INCCOVENANT CONSERVATION CORP: $210,000 · Other+31 more: $421,290 · Other+31 moreJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $232,500 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LIBI INC: $60,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $25,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $15,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $145,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER SANTA BARBARA: $50,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $20,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $104,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $40,000 · Food & NutritionFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc: $5,000 · Food & NutritionSISKIYOU INITIATIVE: $127,500 · EducationVAIL MOUNTAIN SCHOOL: $7,500 · EducationJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC: $124,021 · Human ServicesAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$4,500,334International$332,500Philanthropy$320,000Food & Nutrition$149,000Education$135,000Human Services$124,021Arts & Culture$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $232,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $145,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSISKIYOU INITIATIVE: $127,500 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC: $124,021 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $104,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $100,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LIBI INC: $60,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER SANTA BARBARA: $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT GENESIS: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds SISKIYOU INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LIBI INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER SANTA BARBARA ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT GENESIS ↗
  • Who funds VAIL MOUNTAIN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Fredric and Lundy Reynolds Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Fredric and Lundy Reynolds Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Project Genesis: 7% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Jackson Health Foundation Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fredric and Lundy Reynolds Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph