How much did THE FREDERICK B AND RAMONA E MIRABITO grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 40% of THE FREDERICK B AND RAMONA E MIRABITO’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

chenango

2019

—

2020

renovationsfoodchenango

2021

museum districtrenovationschenango

2022

colorscapeappealfestivalchenango

2023

colorscapepurchase foodfestival

2024

roofpurchaserenovationschurch

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $5k
$10k–50k10 grants · $220k
$50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$250k+1 grant · $254k

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

$17M

Total assets

Largest grants

NORWICH BUILDING TOMORROW FOUNDATION$254,200
BROAD STREET UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$100,000
THE IMPACT PROJECT$45,000
CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER$33,200
CHURCH OF ST BARTHOLOMEW$32,840
AUNT MARY'S HOUSE$25,000
CHENANGO COUNTY BLUES ASSOCIATION$20,000
CATHOLIC SCHOOLS OF CHENANGO COUNTY$15,000
CATHOLIC SCHOOLS OF BROOME COUNTY$14,199
PROMOTE OXFORD NOW INC$12,500
NORWICH JUNIOR FOOTBALL$12,000
COLORSCAPE CHENANGO ARTS FESTIVAL$10,000
SHERBURNE ROTARY CLUB$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $312k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.4M · 19 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +85% since the first grant, against -78% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.4M

$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+85%

-78%

Still filing today

53%

16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NB
NORWICH BUILDING TOMORROW FOUNDATION
3× · 2022–2024 · $909k · revenue +1249% · 47% of their budget
NC
Northeast Classic Car Museum
3× · 2020–2022 · $750k · revenue +21% · 36% of their budget
TI
The Impact Project
5× · 2020–2024 · $421k · revenue +143% · 42% of their budget

Funded once

CM
CHENANGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATI
one grant, 2019 · $400k
TO
TOWN OF OXFORD
one grant, 2020 · $200k
CG
Chenango Greenway Conservatory
one grant, 2021 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Commerce Chenango Inc

To serve our members and the people of chenango county through partnership with businesses and all levels of government,to leverage resources for sustainable economic growth.

—

Chenango Housing Improvement Prgm Inc

The organization's mission is to create, provide, and maintain housing for elderly and low income families.

—

Chenango County Habitat for Humanity

Habitat for humanity works in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to develop communities with god's people in need by building and renovating houses so that there are decent houses in decent communities in…

—

Chenango County Law Enforcement Associat

Law enforcement union

—

Northern York County Historical &

—

Chenango Health Network Inc

Providing health related services to the community

Health

Clinton Historical Society Inc

The primary purpose of the organization is to promote historic preservation to individual throughout the clinton, ny community and the nys area

—

Cutchogue-New Suffolk Hstrcl Cncl

To promote historical research, preserve and restore historical landmarks, buildings and relics and to acquire objects of historical interest.

Arts & Culture

Cheektowaga Historical Assn Inc

Operation of a museum.

Arts & Culture

Chittenango Landing Canal Boat Museum

The museum interprets the broad and deep history of Chittenango Landing: the land, air, water and people by engaging the public through educational and recreational programming while preserving and interpreting the re-created 19th century…

Arts & Culture

Chester Historical Society

The chester historical society (chs) seeks to promote an interest in the history of chester, ct as a prototypical new england small town that has survived and thrived by adapting to changing cultural, economic and demographic environments.

—

Chester Historical Society

Restore historic buildings & maintain sane as well as maintain historic records

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chenango County Historical Society and the most unlike its peers is The Chenango Valley Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

15/15

Grantees still filing

10/15

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,803,295Arts & Culture$1,323,190Community Improvement$909,200Human Services$311,687Environment$50,000Public Benefit$39,329Philanthropy$36,824

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Norwich FoundationNY31.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Norwich Foundation · The R C Smith Foundation Inc · The Roger W Follett Foundation Inc · The Higley Foundation Inc · The Phyllis a and Daryl R Forsythe Foundation · The Everett & Pearl Gilmour Foundation Inc · Thomas &Esther Flanagan Charitable Trust · Otis a Thompson Foundation Inc · Raymond Foundation · The Community Foundation for South · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE FREDERICK B AND RAMONA E MIRABITO funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CHENANGO GREENWAY CONSERVANCY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~20 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 4 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 205011360 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CHENANGO GREENWAY CONSERVANCY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 20 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 53% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Frederick B and Ramona E Mirabito?

Find your warmest path to The Frederick B and Ramona E Mirabito through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE FREDERICK B AND RAMONA E MIRABITO

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Frederick B and Ramona E Mirabito?

More from the funding graph

THE FREDERICK B AND RAMONA E MIRABITO

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Frederick B and Ramona E Mirabito?

More from the funding graph