Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Frazier Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$179k
Granted FY2026still arriving
14
Grants FY2026still arriving
6
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$312kHuman Services$232kEducation$196kHealth$142kYouth Development$93kRecreation & Sports$73kEnvironment$30kHousing & Shelter$30kOther$0
02FY2026 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k8 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $79k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
$7,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$541k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION$65,000
QUAIL VALLEY CHARITIES INC$25,000
ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER$23,400
THE SOURCE$11,000
YOUTH GUIDANCE$10,000
FREEDOM MINISTRIES$10,000
VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART$7,000
JAKE OWEN FONDATION$7,000
CHILDCARE RESOURCES OF INDIAN RIVER$5,000
GILFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVMENT CENTER$5,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
INDIAN RIVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$2,000
VBHS DIAMOND BOSTON CLUB$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–26, $319k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JAKE OWEN FONDATION: $8k → 14%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $500 → 26%JAKE OWEN FONDATION: $7k → 14%JAKE OWEN FONDATION: $5k → 14%SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION: $112k → 12%SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION: $65k → 12%SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION: $64k → 12%SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION: $10k → 12%CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY: $10k → 12%SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION: $10k → 12%CHILDCARE RESOURCES OF INDIAN RIVER: $5k → 12%SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION: $5k → 12%GILFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVMENT CENTER: $5k → 12%GILFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVMENT CENTER: $5k → 12%GILFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVMENT CENTER: $5k → 12%GILFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVMENT CENTER: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
KY
MD
TN
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 16 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2026, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
8

Total granted

$1.2M
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+6%

Still filing today

69%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SR
    Senior Resource Association Inc
    6× · 2021–2026 · $266k · revenue +73%
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    6× · 2017–2025 · $190k · revenue +44%
  • EL
    ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC
    3× · 2024–2026 · $53k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $75k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Coastal Carolinas Health Alliance

Facilitate networking among hospitals

Health
2
Institute for Child and Family Health Inc

The institute for child and family health is committed to empowering the children, youth and families of miami-dade county, florida by providing services that enhance their emotional, physical and educational well-being.

—
3
Cultural Council of Indian River County

To promote the cultural arts in indian river county, florida through education, collaboration, marketing and advocacy.

Arts & Culture
4
Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc

Alleviate hunger by collection & distribution of donated food & other essentials in indian river, martin, okeechobee & st. lucie counties.

Food & Nutrition
5
Northeast Florida Area Agency On Aging Inc

Eldersource empowers people to live and age with independence and dignity in their homes and their community.

—
6
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
7
Coastal Bend Community Foundation

To enhance the quality of life in the coastal bend area of texas through charitable and educational grants.

Philanthropy
8
Executive Roundtable of Indian River County Inc

To identify solutions that will protect and enhance the lives of indian river county children, individuals, families, and seniors.

Youth Development
9
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—
10
Children At Risk

Children At Risk (C@R) is a statewide nonprofit organization whose mission is to serve as a catalyst for change to improve the quality of life for children through strategic research, public policy analysis, education, collaboration, and…

Crime & Legal
11
Family Resources

The mission of the organization is to prevent and treat child abuse by strengthening families.

Human Services
12
Robert a Toigo Foundation

Our mission is to shape the future of finance by developing leaders whose innovation, investment excellence, and human-centered leadership advance the industry and its adjacent sectors.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christian Appalachian Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jake Owen Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

I AM MINISTRIES INC: $301,500 · OtherI AM MINISTRIES INCUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER: $75,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTERMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $32,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTERFREEDOM MINISTRIES INC: $30,000 · OtherFREEDOM MINISTRIES INCIndian River County Habitat for Humanity Inc: $29,947 · OtherIndian River County Habitat for Humanity IncCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Other+8 more: $28,500 · Other+8 moreSenior Resource Association Inc: $265,905 · Human ServicesSenior Resource Association…Jake Owen Foundation: $20,000 · Human ServicesJake Owen FoundationGIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC: $17,500 · Human ServicesGIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT C…+3 more: $15,500 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $190,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHYouth Guidance: $87,775 · EducationYouth Guidance+1 more: $5,000 · EducationQUAIL VALLEY CHARITIES INC: $97,500 · PhilanthropyQUAIL VAL…THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMU…ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $53,400 · EnvironmentVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC: $21,450 · Arts & CultureTHE NEAR AND FAR ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$521,947Human Services$318,905Education$282,775Philanthropy$112,500Environment$53,400Arts & Culture$21,450Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSenior Resource Association Inc: $265,905 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $190,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetQUAIL VALLEY CHARITIES INC: $97,500 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetYouth Guidance: $87,775 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $53,400 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetFREEDOM MINISTRIES INC: $30,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetIndian River County Habitat for Humanity Inc: $29,947 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC: $21,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJake Owen Foundation: $20,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetGIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC: $17,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEAR AND FAR ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Senior Resource Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds QUAIL VALLEY CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Youth Guidance ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Indian River County Habitat for Humanity Inc ↗
  • Who funds VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds Jake Owen Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds CHILDCARE RESOURCES OF INDIAN RIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEAR AND FAR ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE STEPPING STONES FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Indian River Community Foundation IncFL21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Indian River Community Foundation Inc · Olivia Delacruz Foundation Inc · Grand Harbor Community Outreach Program Inc · The Kahle Foundation Inc · Archie S Wingfield Jr Charitable Trust U/A/D 5/15/1995 · Sad Foundation Inc · Bernard a Egan Foundation Inc · Minotty Family Foundation · The Rogers Family Foundation · Jake Owen Foundation · James Ford Bell Foundation · John's Island Community Service League Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Frazier Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Frazier Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Children's Home Society of Florida: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Frazier’s filings →

More from the funding graph