Skip to content

Arizona · Private foundation

The Frantzman Scott Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$75k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
25
Grants FY2025
26
Organizations funded FY2024
12%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$3,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$3,000
Organizations funded a year
19 to 26
FY2019 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
14
Total assets, FY2025
$342k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 12% of the organizations The Frantzman Scott Charitable Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 12% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsFood & NutritionEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving25$75k4%
FY202426$104k12%
FY202325$78k12%
FY202225$75k16%
FY202119$57k0%
FY202020$22k10%
FY201925$75kn/a
99% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Animals$328kHuman Services$76kInternational$30kHealth$27kFood & Nutrition$21kCivil Rights$4kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
AZ
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 33 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 5 recipients with no EIN on record ($51k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Frantzman Scott Charitable Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLast Day Dog Rescue Inc: $21,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetFreedom Service Dogs Inc: $21,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetThe Arizona Animal Welfare League: $21,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSt Mary's Food Bank Alliance: $21,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOld Dog Haven: $21,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPetfinder Foundation: $21,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetOur Companions Domestic Animal Sanctuary Inc: $21,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetWhidbey Animals Improvement Foundation: $20,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNational Mill Dog Rescue: $19,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCanine Companions for Independence Inc: $19,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budget4 Paws for Ability Inc: $19,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNeads Inc: $19,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEast Coast Assistance Dogs Inc: $17,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHandicapped Pets Foundation: $16,000 over 6y, 7.7% of budgetIsrael Guide Dog Center for the Blind: $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of the Israel Defense Forces: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOne Israel Fund Ltd: $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAssociated Humane Societies Inc: $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Veterinary Medical Foundation: $13,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAnimal Refuge League of Greater Portland: $13,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetProgressive Animal Welfare Society aka PAWS: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCompanion Animal Protection Society: $9,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetPlanned Pethood International: $9,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFlying Fur Animal Rescue: $8,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetPilots to the Rescue Inc: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of the Valley: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Shore Animal League America Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Animal Medical Center: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPasado's Safe Haven: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPet Rescue Pilots: $3,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetThe Kamp Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 32.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY19.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Humane World for Animals Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Healthy Paws Foundation · Network for Good · Aetna Foundation Inc · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Greater Good Charities · The Albertsons Companies Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Frantzman Scott Charitable Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Frantzman Scott Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Frantzman Scott Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Frantzman Scott Charitable Foundation

How much does The Frantzman Scott Charitable Foundation give?
The Frantzman Scott Charitable Foundation reported 25 grants totaling $75,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 19 and 26 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2024.
What does The Frantzman Scott Charitable Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2025, its largest causes are Animals (67%), Human Services (16%), International (6%).
Who are The Frantzman Scott Charitable Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2025: Last Day Dog Rescue Inc ($21k), Freedom Service Dogs Inc ($21k), The Arizona Animal Welfare League ($21k).
Does The Frantzman Scott Charitable Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 12% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Frantzman Scott Charitable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Frantzman Scott Charitable Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jpmorgan Chase Foundation, Humane World for Animals Inc, Texas Instruments Foundation.
Where is The Frantzman Scott Charitable Foundation based?
The Frantzman Scott Charitable Foundation is based in AZ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Frantzman Scott’s filings →

More from the funding graph