Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Frankenthal Group Foundation Ltd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$44kPhilanthropy$38kReligion$38kInternational$30kHealth$16kHuman Services$12kCivil Rights$7kEducation$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$776k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES$11,000
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FUND$5,000
EXPERIENCE CAMPS$4,000
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$3,600
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND USA$3,250
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
HELP HOPE LIVE$2,000
KESHET$2,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$1,800
JEWISH UNITED FUND - CHICAGO$1,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE LOWCOUNTRY - COLLETON RIVER CHARITABLE FUND$1,000
ILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM & EDUCATION CENTER$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CLEARBROOK: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
CT
CO
MO
KY
MD
SC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$186k · 13 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
18

Total granted

$186k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+26%

Still filing today

54%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    6× · 2020–2025 · $37k · revenue +57%
  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    6× · 2020–2025 · $36k · revenue +13%
  • K
    KESHET
    5× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • RZ
    ROCHELLE ZELL JEWISH HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +0%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENT FEDERATION OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago

Federation amplifies our collective strength to make the world a better place for everyone. we assist people in need, impact chicagoans of all faiths; support israel and the jewish people worldwide; respond swiftly to crises; cultivate…

Philanthropy
2
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
3
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
4
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
5
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
6
Better Future for Israel

To strengthen israel's future in these areas: 1)providing new immigrants with assistance in a few key areas: representing them as they navigate government ministries and assisting them with their challenges as new immigrants to israel.…

Philanthropy
7
Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia

The jewish federation of greater philadelphia mobilizes financial and volunteer resources to create a bright future for jewish people everywhere. the jewish federation cares for those in need, combats antisemitism and global crises, and…

Philanthropy
8
The Jewish Federations of North America Inc

The federation movement protects and enhances the well-being of jews worldwide through the values of tikkun olam (repairing the world), tzedakah (charity and social justice) and torah (jewish learning). the jewish federations of north…

Philanthropy
9
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
10
The Jewish Federation of Greater Washington Inc

The jewish federation of greater washington (federation) envisions a connected and vibrant jewish community that cares for each other, fosters jewish learning and journeys, embraces jewish peoplehood and israel, and acts as a force for…

Philanthropy
11
Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc

The jewish federation of greater atlanta cares for, connects and strengthens our jewish community throughout greater atlanta, israel and the world.

Philanthropy
12
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish National Fund-Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Highland Park Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HADASSAH: $37,500 · OtherHADASSAHFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FUND: $15,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FUNDJEWISH CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $12,000 · OtherJEWISH CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICESIndividual grant recipient: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKESHET: $9,900 · OtherKESHETILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM: $5,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · Other+16 more: $19,630 · Other+16 moreThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $36,518 · Arts & CultureThe United States H…+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $36,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND…+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $5,400 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC: $5,050 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $3,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $1,500 · InternationalEXPERIENCE CAMPS: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentBRIGHT STAR COMMUNITY OUTREACH CORP: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentHELPHOPELIVE INC: $2,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $2,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $500 · HealthROCHELLE ZELL JEWISH HIGH SCHOOL: $4,000 · Education
Other$114,030Arts & Culture$37,518Philanthropy$37,000International$14,950Youth Development$9,000Health$5,500Education$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $36,518 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $36,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKESHET: $9,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEXPERIENCE CAMPS: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $5,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC: $5,050 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetROCHELLE ZELL JEWISH HIGH SCHOOL: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHT STAR COMMUNITY OUTREACH CORP: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPHOPELIVE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA-ISRAEL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $1,030 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHighland Park Community Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEARBROOK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUIP FOR EQUALITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Frankenthal Group Foundation Ltd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Frankenthal Group Foundation Ltd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Frankenthal Group Foundation Ltd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph