How much did THE FRANK W HOLAS CHARITABLE TRUST grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 69% of THE FRANK W HOLAS CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

diabetes

2021

—

2022

tunnell

2024

tunnell

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,500

Median grant

States reached

$298k

Total assets

Largest grants

ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,500
SHEPARD CENTER$5,000
SALVATION ARMY$4,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$4,000
SHADOW WOOD FUND$3,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$3,000
ALINA LODGE FOUNDATION$3,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$2,500
DANA FARBER CANCER$2,500
HUMANE SOCIETY$2,500
PINE STREET INN$2,500
YMCA NEWNAN$2,000
CHRIS NORTON FOUNDATION$2,000
BOSTON FOOD BANK$2,000
USO$1,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$216k · 24 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$216k

$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%

+60%

Still filing today

29%

45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL
4× · 2020–2024 · $30k · revenue +74%
PINE STREET INN
4× · 2020–2024 · $16k · revenue +90%
AK
AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND
3× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +2%

Funded once

SR
SQ RESCUE
one grant, 2020 · $4k
LL
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY
one grant, 2021 · $4k
LF
LEUKEMIA FOUNDATION
one grant, 2022 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Cure Msa

Philanthropy

American Physiological Society

To advance scientific discovery, understand life, and improve health.

Health

American society of animal sci

To discover, disseminate and apply knowledge for sustainable use of animals for food and other human needs

—

American Society of Addiction Medicine

To increase awareness and improve the quality of care and treatment of addictions.

Health

The Myositis Association

In 2023, The Myositis Association (TMA) celebrated our 30th year of service to the worldwide myositis community. TMA Myositis Africa was established as our newest regional support group, with support from the TMA Women of Color Affinity…

Human Services

Usa Aniridia Network Dba

To provide educational and support programs to those born with a genetic disorder called aniridia syndrome, which due to underdeveloped eye structures renders the child to live life with low vision or blindness and other medical…

Health

Association of Migraine Disorders

Health

American Physical Society

Advance physics by fostering a vibrant, inclusive, and global community dedicated to science and society.

Science & Tech

American Association of Neurosurgeons

The AANS promotes the highest quality of patient care and advances the specialty of neurological surgery.

Health

Multiple Sclerosis Association of

The multiple sclerosis association of america,inc. improves lives today for the entire ms community through vital services and support.

Health

American Medical Writers Association

Amwa's mission is to promote excellence in medical communication and to provide educational resources in support of that goal.

Arts & Culture

Mercy Research

As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital and the most unlike its peers is Misericordia University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

14/14

Grantees still filing

10/14

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$166,801Health$51,500Human Services$16,500Animals$4,500Religion$3,000Education$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE FRANK W HOLAS CHARITABLE TRUST funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: LIBERTY YOUTH RANCH.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~20 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.5× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 383674666 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on LIBERTY YOUTH RANCH, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 20 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 0% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Frank W Holas Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Frank W Holas Charitable Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE FRANK W HOLAS CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Frank W Holas Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph

THE FRANK W HOLAS CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Frank W Holas Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph