Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Four Bees Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$240k
Granted FY2024still arriving
42
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$77k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Religion$808kHuman Services$189kPhilanthropy$152kEducation$84kInternational$35kAnimals$20kHealth$15kYouth Development$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k35 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $117k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $77k
$1,250
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BUNCOMBE STREET UNITED METHODIST CH$76,800
HIGHLANDS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$38,050
FRAZEE DREAM CENTER$30,000
MC CALLIE SCHOOL$17,000
ZOE MINISTRY$12,000
UNITED WAY OF GREENVILLE$10,000
TRIUNE MERCY CENTER$10,000
Boys and Girls Club of the Plateau$5,000
PRIMERA IGLESIA BAUTISTA$5,000
JUMP START$5,000
PLEASANT HILL BAPTIST CHURCH$3,100
DENISON UNIVERSITY$3,000
SEARCH MINISTRIES$3,000
CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES OF THE CAROLIN$2,000
The Salvation Army$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%EPWORTH CHILDREN'S HOME: $550 → 16%THORNWELL HOME FOR CHILDREN: $100 → 18%RISE AND SHINENEIGHBORS IN MINISTRY: $100 → 13%PARTNERS IN AGRICULTURE: $500 → 10%PARTNERS IN AGRICULTURE: $100 → 10%MIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
CO
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 48 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

48 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
49

Total granted

$1.2M
$109k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+47%

Still filing today

31%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentReligionInternationalFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MCCALLIE SCHOOL
    6× · 2019–2024 · $60k · revenue +22%
  • Zoe Empowers
    3× · 2022–2024 · $32k · revenue +35%
  • DU
    DENISON UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $18k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • BS
    BUNCOME STREET UNITED METHODIST CHU
    one grant, 2022 · $68k
  • SW
    SC WATER FOWL ASSO
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

2
UrbanPromise Charlotte

Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.

Youth Development
3
Trinity Oaks Christian Academy

Trinity oaks christian academny partners with the christian home and church in the training of children maximizing their potential to lead christian lives according to biblical standards.

Education
4
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
5
Landmark Christian School

Landmark christian school partners with christian families by equipping college-bound students to embrace a christ-centered worldview, grow as servant leaders, and steward god's unique purpose for their lives.

6
Thrive Ministries Inc

Faith-based education and care of children

Education
7
Tyndale Christian School

Tyndale christian school provides a distinctively christian education devoted to cultivating academic excellence and love for all that is gods.

Religion
8
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
9
Summit Classical Christian School

Summit Classical Christian School is a PreK-12 school that exists to cultivate generations of joyful disciples of Christ by partnering with faithful Christian families to educate their children from a Biblical worldview using classical…

Education
10
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
11
Global Scholars

Global scholars exists so that christian academics are adequately equipped to have a redemptive influence among their students, colleagues, universities and disciplines, at a reasonable cost.

12
Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary

To equip men to be preachers, pastors, and churchmen for christ's kingdom among the nations.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Miracle Hill Ministries Inc and the most unlike its peers is Favor Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…Independent K-8 SchoolsYouth Development CentersLand Conservation Organizat…Child and Family ServicesYouth Sports Booster Organi…Elementary Literacy TutoringHomeless Services & ShelterAffordable Housing Developm…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…United Way Federations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr12%3%5–10yr15%16%10–20yr24%16%20–35yr9%26%35–55yr19%39%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr12%5%5–10yr15%5%10–20yr24%11%20–35yr9%31%35–55yr19%48%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/40
the rest of the field
12%
3,449/28,749

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 113 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HIGHLANDS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $239,375 · OtherHIGHLANDS UNITED METHODIST CHURCHFRAZEE DREAM CENTER — $180,000 · OtherFRAZEE DREAM CENTERBUNCOMBE STREET UNITED METHODIST — $171,410 · OtherBUNCOMBE STREET UNITED METHODISTBUNCOMBE STREET UNITED METHODIST CH — $140,275 · OtherBUNCOMBE STREET UNITED METHODIST CHJUMP START — $85,000 · OtherJUMP STARTBUNCOME STREET UNITED METHODIST CHU — $67,950 · OtherBUNCOME STREET UNITED METHODIST CHUUNITED WAY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY INC — $60,000 · Other+87 more — $221,825 · Other+87 moreTHE MCCALLIE SCHOOL — $60,150 · EducationDENISON UNIVERSITY — $18,000 · EducationBoys & Girls Club of The Plateau Inc — $5,000 · EducationTRINITY-PAWLING SCHOOL CORPORATION — $4,500 · Education+1 more — $1,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC — $50,000 · PhilanthropyEMMANUEL'S HAMMER INC — $3,125 · PhilanthropyTRIUNE MERCY CENTER — $50,350 · Food & NutritionZoe Empowers — $31,750 · InternationalHIGHLANDS BOLIVIAN MISSION INC — $1,500 · InternationalSOUTH CAROLINA CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION — $25,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $1,525 · Religion+1 more — $200 · ReligionEMBRACE THE DREAM FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesEPWORTH CHILDREN'S HOME — $1,050 · Human ServicesPARTNERS IN AGRICULTURE INC — $600 · Human ServicesMIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC — $500 · Human Services+2 more — $200 · Human Services
Other$1,165,835Education$88,650Philanthropy$53,125Food & Nutrition$50,350International$33,250Religion$26,725Human Services$8,350

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE MCCALLIE SCHOOL — $60,150 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY INC — $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTRIUNE MERCY CENTER — $50,350 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetZoe Empowers — $31,750 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDENISON UNIVERSITY — $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEMBRACE THE DREAM FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of The Plateau Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRINITY-PAWLING SCHOOL CORPORATION — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEMMANUEL'S HAMMER INC — $3,125 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $1,525 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLANDS BOLIVIAN MISSION INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetEPWORTH CHILDREN'S HOME — $1,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHRIST CHURCH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONS OF COACHES INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN AGRICULTURE INC — $600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED MINISTRIES — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHORNWELL — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNeighbors in Ministry Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPARTANBURG DAY SCHOOL — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Ministries Inc — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MCCALLIE SCHOOL
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY INC
  • Who funds TRIUNE MERCY CENTER
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC
  • Who funds Zoe Empowers
  • Who funds SOUTH CAROLINA CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds EMBRACE THE DREAM FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds SOUTH CAROLINA WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Club of The Plateau Inc
  • Who funds TRINITY-PAWLING SCHOOL CORPORATION
  • Who funds EMMANUEL'S HAMMER INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Yeargin FoundationSC20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Yeargin Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Charles Timmons Foundation · John I Smith Charities Inc · South Carolina Christian Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Hayne Hipp Foundation · Spinks Family Foundation · Bill and Connie Timmons Foundation · The Jolley Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Four Bees Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 113 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph