Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Foss Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$458k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$430kHealth$309kEducation$236kAnimals$210kFood & Nutrition$124kArts & Culture$107kInternational$50kRecreation & Sports$39kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $338k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $95k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PITTSFIELD YOUTH WORKSHOP$95,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
PITTSFIELD MIDDLE HIGH SCHOOL$36,333
NH FOOD BANK$30,000
LIVE AND LET LIVE FARM$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
CONCORD HOSPITAL TRUST$30,000
CHAD$25,000
MSPCA ANGELL$25,000
THE FRIENDLY KITCHEN$15,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$15,000
THE PITTSFIELD PLAYERS$15,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$15,000
KREMPLES CENTER$12,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NH FOOD BANK: $30k → 7%NH FOOD BANK: $20k → 7%NH FOOD BANK: $12k → 7%NH FOOD BANK: $8k → 7%NH FOOD BANK: $4k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 21 repeat orgs$198k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
3

Total granted

$1.6M
$30k

Still filing today

33%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $168k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Concord Hospital Trust
    7× · 2019–2025 · $181k · revenue +318%
  • NH
    New Hampshire Catholic Charities
    6× · 2020–2025 · $99k · revenue +14%
  • MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    5× · 2020–2025 · $80k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CENT NH
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • 1C
    1ST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • D
    DARE
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Portsmouth General Hospital Foundation
—
2
Piscataquog Land Conservancy

The Piscataquog Land Conservancy is a nonprofit land conservation organization founded in 1970. Its purpose is to conserve the natural and scenic environment of the Piscataquog, Souhegan and Nashua River watershed communities of southern…

—
3
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
4
New England Animal Health Inc
Science & Tech
5
Jeff's Place Children's Bereavement Center Inc

Jeff's Place offers hope and healing in a supportive community for grieving children, teens, families and individuals.

Human Services
6
Windsor Hospital Corporation

Mt. ascutney hospital and health center's mission is to improve the lives of those we serve.

Health
7
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
8
Wentworth-Douglass Health System

Support and further the charitable activities of Wentworth-Douglass Hospital, Wentworth-Douglass Physician Corporation and Wentworth-Douglass Hospital & Health Foundation by being operated in connection with said organizations.

—
9
Penobscot Valley Humane Society

Rescue and re-adoption of dogs and cats.

—
10
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
11
Concord Hospital Inc

Concord Hospital is a charitable organization which exists to meet the health needs of individuals within the communities it serves.

Health
12
Alice Peck Day Lifecare Center Inc

The mission of APD Lifecare Center is to improve the health and well-being of our community

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals; the most unlike its peers is Pittsfield Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PITTSFIELD MIDDLE HIGHSCHOOL: $235,702 · OtherPITTSFIELD MIDDLE HIGHSCHOOLPITTSFIELD YOUTH WKSP: $204,785 · OtherPITTSFIELD YOUTH WKSPLIVE AND LET LIVE ANIMAL FARM: $100,000 · OtherLIVE AND LET LIVE ANIMAL FARMIndividual grant recipient: $95,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPITTSFIELD YOUTH WORKSHOP INC: $95,000 · OtherPITTSFIELD YOUTH WORKSHOP INCCHAD: $94,000 · OtherCHADPITTSFIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $89,700 · OtherPITTSFIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETYCONCORD REGIONAL VISITING NURSES: $70,000 · OtherMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $69,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · Other+14 more: $230,355 · Other+14 moreConcord Hospital Trust: $181,000 · HealthConcord Hosp…DAVID'S HOUSE INC: $17,500 · HealthDAVID'S HOUS…MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $80,000 · AnimalsLIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC: $30,000 · AnimalsNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $99,000 · Human ServicesKREMPELS BRAIN INJURY CENTER: $35,500 · PhilanthropyTHE PITTSFIELD PLAYERS: $15,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,328,542Health$198,500Animals$110,000Human Services$99,000Philanthropy$35,500Arts & Culture$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetConcord Hospital Trust: $181,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $99,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPITTSFIELD YOUTH WORKSHOP INC: $95,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetPITTSFIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $89,700 over 6y, 42% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $80,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKREMPELS BRAIN INJURY CENTER: $35,500 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetTHE FRIENDLY KITCHEN INC: $25,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetDAVID'S HOUSE INC: $17,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PITTSFIELD PLAYERS: $15,000 over 1y, 28% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Concord Hospital Trust ↗
  • Who funds New Hampshire Catholic Charities ↗
  • Who funds PITTSFIELD YOUTH WORKSHOP INC ↗
  • Who funds PITTSFIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds KREMPELS BRAIN INJURY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDLY KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds DAVID'S HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PITTSFIELD PLAYERS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Foss Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Foss Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Foss Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph