Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Forbes Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$67kHuman Services$19kEducation$18kFood & Nutrition$10kHealth$8kEnvironment$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kRecreation & Sports$800
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$322k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHMINISTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$7,000
CHURCH OF THE RESURRECTION$5,800
SALVATION ARMY$3,500
UNIVERSITY OF TULSA COLLEGE OF LAW$2,500
ASCENSION ST JOHN FOUNDATION$1,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$1,000
MEALS ON WHEELS-TULSA$1,000
CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF TULSA$700
AMERICAN RED CROSS-TULSA AREA CHAPTER$500
UP WITH TREES$500
Individual grant recipient$500
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION-TULSA$500
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA$500
ZETA PSI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$250
FRIENDS OF CATHOLIC EDUCATION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $250 → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $250 → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $200 → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $200 → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $200 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$128k · 19 repeat orgs$750 to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
1

Total granted

$128k
$500

Still filing today

42%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionReligionEducationRecreation & SportsHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +66%
  • IRON GATE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1k · revenue +66%
  • ZP
    ZETA PSI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1k · revenue +207%

Funded once

  • JC
    JENKS COMMUNITY EDUCATION JENKS PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2023 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Francis Hospital Inc

To extend the presence and healing ministry of christ in all we do.

Health
2
Regional Food Bank of Oklahoma Inc

The mission of the regional food bank of oklahoma is to lead a network that provides nutritious food and pathways to self-sufficiency for people facing hunger. our vision is an oklahoma where no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
3
Family Safety Center Inc

The family safety center exists to promote safety and justice in tulsa county through co-located multi-disciplinary services that offer protection, hope and healing to victims of intimate partner and family violence, sexual assault,…

Crime & Legal
4
Ssm Health Care of Oklahoma Inc

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
5
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
6
Tulsa Community Service Center Inc

Provide financial and supplement assistance to the tulsa area communities

Human Services
7
Tulsa Volunteers of America Senior Housing Inc

Provides housing to elderly persons under section 202 of the national housing act under agreement with the department of hud.

—
8
Lawton Food Bank Inc

To provide food and essential resources to low-income individuals and families across southwest oklahoma through emergency and supplemental programs, mobile and collaborative distributions, and strong community partnerships while upholding…

—
9
Oklahoma Heart Research and Education Foundation Inc
Health
10
Oklahoma Single Parent Scholarship Program

Provides financial support, scholarships, and encouragement to low-income single parents pursuing postsecondary education. By helping them stay in school and complete degrees, the program empowers families to achieve self-sufficiency,…

Education
11
Oklahoma Educational Memorial Trust Fdn

Providing, maintaining and issuing scholarships to eligible nominees or applicants for admission to college or for contributions to regularly maintained scholarship funds of other federal tax exempt colleges and universities with an…

Education
12
Oklahoma Association of Electric Cooperatives

The Oklahoma Association of Electric Cooperatives is a statewide association created in 1942 and voluntarily supported by Oklahoma's non-profit electric cooperatives for the purpose to collectively perform services which would not be…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Food Bank of Eastern Oklahoma Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTHMINISTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $42,000 · OtherSOUTHMINISTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHCHURCH OF THE RESURRECTION: $22,800 · OtherCHURCH OF THE RESURRECTIONUNIVERSITY OF TULSA COLLEGE OF LAW: $15,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TULSA COLLEGE OF LAWSALVATION ARMY: $13,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYMEALS ON WHEELS-TULSA: $6,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $5,000 · OtherST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $4,250 · Other+7 more: $12,550 · Other+7 moreCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $2,900 · Food & NutritionIRON GATE INC: $1,300 · ReligionZETA PSI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,200 · EducationLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $1,100 · Human ServicesSpecial Olympics Oklahoma Inc: $800 · Recreation & SportsAmerican Heart Association Inc: $750 · HealthFriends of Catholic Education: $250 · Philanthropy
Other$120,600Food & Nutrition$2,900Religion$1,300Education$1,200Human Services$1,100Recreation & Sports$800Health$750Philanthropy$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $5,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUP WITH TREES INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $2,900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetIRON GATE INC: $1,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetZETA PSI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $1,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSpecial Olympics Oklahoma Inc: $800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds UP WITH TREES INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds IRON GATE INC ↗
  • Who funds ZETA PSI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Special Olympics Oklahoma Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Catholic Education ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Forbes Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Forbes Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Up With Trees Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Forbes’ filings →

More from the funding graph