Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Foothills Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$4.0MRecreation & Sports$4.0MEducation$2.5MEnvironment$640kHealth$441kArts & Culture$425kHousing & Shelter$350kPublic Benefit$295kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k19 grants · $425k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $675k
  • $250k+2 grants · $733k
$25,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$10.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANNON SCHOOL INC$400,000
DELTA WATERFOWL FOUNDATION$333,333
CONGRESSIONAL SPORTSMENS FOUNDATION$200,000
KIDS OUTDOOR SPORTS CAMP$150,000
UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC$100,000
MZURI WILDLIFE CLUB FOUNDATION$75,000
DUCKS UNLIMITED INC$50,000
PUT ON THE BRAKES INC$50,000
WING & BARREL FOUNDATION$50,000
SAN JOSE AUXILIARY FOR CHILDREN$25,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$25,000
BRANNAN CENTER$25,000
IMMACULATE CONCEPTION ACADEMY$25,000
WEST COAST STOCK CAR HALL OF FAME$25,000
OPERATION FREEDOM PAWS$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LOVING ANGEL SERVICE DOGS: $20k → 10%BRANNAN CENTER: $25k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
ND
MI
OH
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 31% of The Foothills Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Foothills Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 30 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against -16% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
36

Total granted

$11M
$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
-16%

Still filing today

73%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $335k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthAnimalsEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DW
    Delta Waterfowl Foundation
    6× · 2017–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +161%
  • CS
    CANNON SCHOOL INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +46%
  • KO
    KIDS OUTDOOR SPORTS CAMP
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +154% · 82% of their budget

Funded once

  • CS
    CONGRESSIONAL SPORTSMEN'S CAUCUS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $900k
  • CS
    CONGRESSIONAL SPORTSMEN'S CAUCUS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $150k
  • TP
    TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2018 · $135k · revenue -50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sierra State Parks Foundation

The Sierra State Parks Foundation provides critically needed financial and professional support to the Lake Tahoe-Donner Sierra State Parks for Education, Restoration, and Cultural and Environmental Preservation in partnership with…

Recreation & Sports
2
California Wildlife Foundation

The foundation works with diverse groups representing many interests to acquire and restore critical wildlife habitat and protecting species

Animals
3
California Waterfowl Foundation

It is the foundation's mission to further the purposes and objectives of california waterfowl association (cwa), a california corporation exempt from income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code.

—
4
Wildlife Health Center Foundation

The wildlife health center foundation raises funds to promote teaching, research and service activities at the wildlife health center within the school of veterinary medicine at the university of california, davis.

Environment
5
Tahoe Nordic Search & Rescue Inc

The tahoe nordic search and rescue team (tnsar) ... was conceived in 1976 as a response to the death of a boy lost off the back side of northstar-at-tahoe ski area during a blizzard. there was, at the time, no organized backcountry team to…

—
6
Humane Society of the Sierra Foothills

To prevent animal abuse and neglect, enforce the anti-cruelty laws of the State of California and promote the wellbeing of animals.

Animals
7
Carson Springs Wildlife Foundation
Animals
8
California Marine Sanctuary Foundation

The california marine sanctuary foundation is a nonprofit organization working to advance the understanding and stewardship of ocean resources in california. for over 25 years cmsf has partnered with local communities, businesses,…

Animals
9
Michael Hoefflin Foundation

The michael hoefflin foundation for children's cancer is a public non profit 501(c)3 foundation that provides financial and emotional support to children and their families in the santa clarita valley, antelope valley, san fernando…

Health
10
San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory

The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.

Environment
11
Santa Cruz Sailing Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Anglers of Honor

Anglers of honor strives to make therapeutic fly fishing opportunities available to individuals with physical disabilities and their families. we aim to fulfill our mission through preservation efforts and unique programming all across the…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Victory Junction Gang Camp Inc; the most unlike its peers is West Coast Stock Car Hall of Fame. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/51
Grantees still filing
32/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGRESSIONAL SPORTSMEN'S FOUNDATION: $938,500 · OtherCONGRESSIONAL SPORTSMEN'S FOUNDATIONCONGRESSIONAL SPORTSMEN'S CAUCUS FOUNDATION: $900,000 · OtherCONGRESSIONAL SPORTSMEN'S CAUCUS FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC (UOP): $625,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC (UOP)DELTA WATERFOWL FOUNDATION (DWF): $525,000 · OtherDELTA WATERFOWL FOUNDATION (DWF)BACK CREEK CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $261,500 · OtherCALIFORNIA WILDLIFE OFFICERS FOUNDATION (CALWOF): $240,000 · OtherWING & BARREL FOUNDATION: $200,000 · Other+46 more: $2,106,292 · Other+46 moreDelta Waterfowl Foundation: $1,983,334 · AnimalsDelta Waterfowl Fou…MZURI WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $245,000 · AnimalsMZURI WILDLIFE FOUN…+3 more: $100,000 · AnimalsCANNON SCHOOL INC: $1,415,000 · EducationCANNON SCHOOL …Rotary Club of Mount Shasta Foundation: $130,000 · EducationRotary Club of…University of the Pacific: $100,000 · EducationUniversity of …ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL: $75,000 · Education+1 more: $50,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION: $1,028,000 · EnvironmentCALIFORNIA W…Ducks Unlimited Inc: $445,000 · EnvironmentDucks Unlimi…KIDS OUTDOOR SPORTS CAMP: $1,404,000 · Youth DevelopmentKIDS OUTDOO…+1 more: $24,345 · Youth DevelopmentHOSPITALITY HOUSE OF THE UPPER PENINSULA: $100,000 · HealthCHILDRESS INSTITUTE FOR PEDIATRIC TRAUMA: $100,000 · HealthSERIOUSFUN CHILDREN'S NETWORK: $95,000 · HealthROC SOLID FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 · HealthHouse of Hope Foundation Inc: $25,000 · Health+2 more: $21,000 · HealthOPERATION FREEDOM PAWS: $294,500 · Public Benefit
Other$5,796,292Animals$2,328,334Education$1,770,000Environment$1,473,000Youth Development$1,428,345Health$421,000Public Benefit$294,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDelta Waterfowl Foundation: $1,983,334 over 6y, 7.5% of budgetCANNON SCHOOL INC: $1,415,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetKIDS OUTDOOR SPORTS CAMP: $1,404,000 over 8y, 82% of budgetCALIFORNIA WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION: $1,028,000 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL SPORTSMEN'S FOUNDATION: $938,500 over 5y, 8.5% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $445,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION FREEDOM PAWS: $294,500 over 5y, 9.1% of budgetMZURI WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $245,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetWING & BARREL FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 3y, 62% of budgetCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION: $185,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetWEST COAST STOCK CAR HALL OF FAME: $180,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $135,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRotary Club of Mount Shasta Foundation: $130,000 over 4y, 54% of budgetUniversity of the Pacific: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPITALITY HOUSE OF THE UPPER PENINSULA: $100,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetCHILDRESS INSTITUTE FOR PEDIATRIC TRAUMA: $100,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetDENTON PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetSERIOUSFUN CHILDREN'S NETWORK: $95,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetROC SOLID FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMARIUCCI FAMILY FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA WILDLIFE OFFICERS FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetMADDEN CHARITIES: $60,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetNATIONAL SPORTS MEDIA ASSOCIATION INC: $60,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetNATIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOTORSPORTS CHARITIES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPUT ON THE BRAKES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetStockton Shelter For The Homeless: $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE UNITED STATES SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBRANNAN CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMID-PENINSULA EDUCATION CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLAKE NORMAN HUMANE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN JOSE AUXILIARY FOR CHILDREN dba THRIFT BOX: $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetGRASSLAND FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetVICTORY JUNCTION GANG CAMP INC: $24,345 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDRENS HEALTH GUILD: $20,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetSHERIFF'S ADVISORY BOARD OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $15,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetKYLE PETTY CHARITY RIDE TRUST INC: $15,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetRED BANK OUTDOOR ACADEMY: $15,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetCAREPOSSIBLE INC: $11,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMAX'S HELPING PAWS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSmith-Kingsmore Syndrome Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetFREGOSO OUTDOOR FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCARRY THE LOAD: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's HopeChest: $1,292 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Delta Waterfowl Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CANNON SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS OUTDOOR SPORTS CAMP ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CONGRESSIONAL SPORTSMEN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION FREEDOM PAWS ↗
  • Who funds MZURI WILDLIFE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WING & BARREL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHP 11-99 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WEST COAST STOCK CAR HALL OF FAME ↗
  • Who funds TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds Rotary Club of Mount Shasta Foundation ↗
  • Who funds University of the Pacific ↗
  • Who funds HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF THE UPPER PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRESS INSTITUTE FOR PEDIATRIC TRAUMA ↗
  • Who funds DENTON PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SERIOUSFUN CHILDREN'S NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds ROC SOLID FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MARIUCCI FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA WILDLIFE OFFICERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MADDEN CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL SPORTS MEDIA ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MOTORSPORTS CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds PUT ON THE BRAKES INC ↗
  • Who funds Stockton Shelter For The Homeless ↗
  • Who funds THE UNITED STATES SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC14× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · Bellevue Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Heffernan Group Foundation · Nfl Foundation Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Duke Energy Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Foothills Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Foothills Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Foothills Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Foothills Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Foothills’ filings →

    More from the funding graph