Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Foor Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$229k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$292kEducation$275kYouth Development$198kHuman Services$133kRecreation & Sports$132kFood & Nutrition$107kHealth$100kEnvironment$88kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $119k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
READING PALS CHICO$70,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF THE NORTH VALLE$25,000
TRUE NORTH HOUSING ALLIANCE$25,000
DURHAM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$22,644
CSU Chico Foundation$16,000
Butte Ag Foundation$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
FRIENDS OF THE CHICO COMMUNITY BALL$10,000
SALVATION ARMY$8,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
NATIONAL SOCIETY OF BLACK ENGINEERS$6,000
CHICO STEM CONNECTIONS COLLABORATIV$5,000
Kiwanis Club$2,500
BETA CHAPTER OF OMEGA NU FOUNDATION$2,000
BUTTE UNITED SOCCER CLUB$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%DURHAM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $23k → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%Arc of Butte County: $7k → 18%Chico Meals on Wheels: $3k → 18%Chico Meals on Wheels: $3k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 40 repeat orgs$585k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
53

Total granted

$1.0M
$496k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+26%

Still filing today

30%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $89k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RP
    READING PALS CHICO
    3× · 2022–2024 · $130k · revenue +649% · 80% of their budget
  • EH
    ENLOE HEALTH FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2023 · $73k · revenue +97%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2020–2024 · $56k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • AF
    ABILITY FIRST SPORTSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +33% · 42% of their budget
  • NC
    NORD COUNTRY SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $38k · revenue +26%
  • CC
    CSU CHICO - ECOLOGICAL RESERVES
    one grant, 2021 · $33k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chico Friends of the Butte County Library

Purchase books, digital media, magazines, and equipment. sponsor library programs and provide volunteer recognition.

Education
2
Chico Velo

To promote public awareness and educate participants to bicycle safety and alternative transportation. the organization holds several major bicycle events open to the public.

—
3
Chico Country Day School

We partner with students, families, and the community to spark curiosity and engage in work that matters.

Education
4
Chico Chamber of Commerce Community Corporation

Primary exempt purpose: to raise and receive funds, accept donations, and administer and expend funds and assets exclusively for charitable and educational purposes, within the meaning of section 501 (c) (3) of the internal revenue code of…

Community Improvement
5
Chico History Museum Inc

To operate the chico history museum in chico, ca and in the process conserve, research and display the history of chico by communicating the history for the education and enjoyment of the community and preserve the relationship of the…

Arts & Culture
6
Downtown Chico Business Association

Promote interest and trade and beautify the downtown business environment.

Community Improvement
7
Butte Environmental Council

Butte Environmental Council's Mission is to protect and defend the land, air, and water of Butte County and the surrounding region through action, advocacy, and education.

Environment
8
Butte Community College Foundation

The butte college foundation supports butte college through fundraising and other forms of support. its most significant achievement is its scholarship program that awards approximately 250 internal scholarships to 170 students and…

Unclassified
9
Friends of the Chico Animal Shelter

Friends of the Chico Animal Shelter raises funds for the Chico Animal Shelter medical fund.

Animals
10
The Rotary Club of Chico Foundation

To provide humanitarian service, encourage high ethical standards in all vocations, and help build goodwill and peace in the world.

Community Improvement
11
Chico Rescue Mission

to provide recovery services to addicts

Religion
12
Core Butte Inc

To utilize the independent study/personalized learning approach supporting development through choice of curriculum necessary for their future success.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Taos Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is University Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/37
Grantees still filing
24/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Boys Girls Club of North Val: $108,445 · OtherBoys Girls Club of North ValButte Ag Foundation: $76,677 · OtherButte Ag FoundationIndividual grant recipient: $58,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $53,809 · OtherInspire Foundation: $45,500 · OtherPeg Taylor Center: $39,687 · OtherCSU Chico Foundation: $38,000 · Other+68 more: $687,385 · Other+68 moreREADING PALS CHICO: $130,000 · EducationREADING PALS …NORD COUNTRY SCHOOL: $38,000 · EducationNORD COUNTRY …CHICO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $15,000 · EducationCHICO CHILDRE…BUTTE COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION: $10,000 · EducationBLUE OAK CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $8,950 · EducationBridges Project for Education: $8,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationNORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $174,000 · PhilanthropyNORTH VALLEY…GRIDLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyGRIDLEY EDUC…+4 more: $13,130 · Philanthropy+4 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $56,000 · Human ServicesAmerican …ABILITY FIRST SPORTS: $40,000 · Human ServicesABILITY F…DURHAM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $22,644 · Human ServicesDURHAM CO…Youth for Change: $15,000 · Human ServicesYouth for…THE ARC OF BUTTE COUNTY: $7,000 · Human ServicesCHICO AREA COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $6,500 · Human ServicesENLOE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $72,500 · HealthEVERYBODY HEALTHY BODY: $18,000 · Recreation & SportsPARADISE STRONGER INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsButte United Soccer Club: $4,000 · Recreation & SportsTrue North Housing Alliance Inc Torres Shelter: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterSAFE SPACE WINTER SHELTER INC: $2,400 · Housing & ShelterChico Housing Action Team: $1,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,108,003Education$210,950Philanthropy$207,130Human Services$147,144Health$72,500Recreation & Sports$32,000Housing & Shelter$28,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $174,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetREADING PALS CHICO: $130,000 over 3y, 80% of budgetENLOE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $72,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $56,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetABILITY FIRST SPORTS: $40,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetNORD COUNTRY SCHOOL: $38,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHONEY RUN COVERED BRIDGE ASSOCIATIO: $25,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE NORTH VALLEY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTrue North Housing Alliance Inc Torres Shelter: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDURHAM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $22,644 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetGRIDLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetEVERYBODY HEALTHY BODY: $18,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetYouth for Change: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBUTTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S MOUNTED POSSE: $15,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS HOUSING FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetBUTTE HUMANE SOCIETY: $11,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPARADISE STRONGER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHICO COMMUNITY BALLET INC: $10,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetBLUE OAK CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $8,950 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBridges Project for Education: $8,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetTHE ARC OF BUTTE COUNTY: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHICO AREA COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $6,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetLAKE ALMANOR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetBeta Chapter of Omega Nu Foundation: $4,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetButte United Soccer Club: $4,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetChico Cat Coalition: $3,300 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetGOLDEN VALLEY BANK COMMUNITY: $2,130 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILDFLOWER OPEN CLASSROOM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChico Air Museum: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE TAOS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChico Housing Action Team: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds READING PALS CHICO ↗
  • Who funds ENLOE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds ABILITY FIRST SPORTS ↗
  • Who funds NORD COUNTRY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HONEY RUN COVERED BRIDGE ASSOCIATIO ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE NORTH VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds True North Housing Alliance Inc Torres Shelter ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DURHAM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GRIDLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EVERYBODY HEALTHY BODY ↗
  • Who funds CHICO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Youth for Change ↗
  • Who funds BUTTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S MOUNTED POSSE ↗
  • Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS HOUSING FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

North Valley Community FoundationCA52× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: North Valley Community Foundation · Golden Valley Bank Community · Virginia L Jones Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Gap Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Foor Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Foor Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Foor Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Foor Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 101 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Foor’s filings →

    More from the funding graph