Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Fonda Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$427k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.0MYouth Development$411kCivil Rights$277kEnvironment$273kArts & Culture$247kHuman Services$141kInternational$99kPublic Benefit$84kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$4,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$6.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMORY UNIVERSITY$200,000
HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES$29,750
HOMIES UNIDOS$28,000
UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION$28,000
THOMASVILLE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER$20,000
GCAPP$20,000
GIRLS INC OF SANTA FE$12,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
AMAZON FRONTLINES$10,000
VERMONT INDEPENDENT MEDIAINC$10,000
CURIOUS COMMUNICATIONS$10,000
UPAYA ZEN CENTER$5,000
GREENPEACE FUND$5,000
INDIGENOUS WOMEN RISING$4,000
WOMEN'S COMMUNITY CENTER$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $171k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE OKRA PROJECT: $1k → 20%GCAPP: $75k → 13%TRIBAL IMAGES MUSEUM: $5k → 17%GCAPP: $20k → 13%GCAPP: $20k → 13%GCAPP: $20k → 13%GCAPP: $20k → 13%GCAPP: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
MO
KY
MD
AZ
NM
DC
LA
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 48 repeat orgs$304k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

48 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
42

Total granted

$3.4M
$272k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
0%

Still filing today

79%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationArts & CultureInternationalCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EU
    Emory University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +80%
  • GC
    Georgia Campaign for Adolescent Power and Potential Inc
    6× · 2017–2025 · $165k · revenue +29%
  • HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES
    6× · 2018–2025 · $135k · revenue +157%

Funded once

  • TH
    THE HAWKINS PROJECT
    one grant, 2021 · $46k · revenue -3%
  • WA
    WORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +183%
  • YA
    YOUNG AUTHORS GREENHOUSE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $24k · revenue -5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
3
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
4
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
5
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
6
Water Protector Legal Collective

The water protector legal collective is an indigenous-led legal nonprofit that provides support and advocacy for indigenous peoples and original nations, the earth, and climate justice movements.

Crime & Legal
7
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
8
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
9
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
10
Environment Next Inc

Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues. we provide leadership, outreach and communication support, grants, and investments to empower leaders and their ideas…

Environment
11
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
12
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Climate Resolve; the most unlike its peers is Indigenous Women Rising Indigeous Women Rising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

82 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 82 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
80/82
Grantees still filing
47/82
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Emory University: $1,800,000 · EducationEmory UniversitySCHOLARMATCH INC: $97,200 · Education+8 more: $118,000 · Education+8 moreACLU: $92,000 · OtherACLUPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $40,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODBRAVE NEW FILMS: $37,000 · OtherBRAVE NEW FILMSINDIGENOUS WOMEN RISING INDIGEOUS WOMEN RISING: $28,000 · OtherEsperanza Shelter Inc: $25,000 · OtherUPAYA ZEN CENTER INC: $23,500 · OtherUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $76,000 · OtherUNITED NATIONS FOUND…CURIOUS COMMUNICATIONS INC: $40,000 · OtherCURIOUS COMMUNICATIO…+43 more: $312,950 · Other+43 moreHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $135,250 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC: $86,000 · Youth DevelopmentPICO YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER: $16,000 · Youth DevelopmentLOS ANGELES DRAMA CLUB INC: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentGREENPEACE FUND INC: $127,000 · EnvironmentHEAL THE BAY: $16,500 · EnvironmentCLIMATE RESOLVE: $14,000 · EnvironmentCLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND: $11,000 · EnvironmentAMAZON FRONTLINES: $10,000 · EnvironmentOCEANA INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentVOICES FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE: $10,000 · EnvironmentBlack Mesa Trust inc: $10,000 · EnvironmentTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $8,500 · Environment+8 more: $32,800 · EnvironmentGeorgia Campaign for Adolescent Power and Potential Inc: $165,000 · Human ServicesTHOMASVILLE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $78,000 · Human Services+2 more: $6,000 · Human ServicesHOMIES UNIDOS INC: $131,000 · Crime & LegalWE THE PEOPLE OPPORTUNITY FARM INC: $7,000 · Crime & Legal+3 more: $6,000 · Crime & LegalVermont Independent Media Inc: $65,000 · Arts & CultureROCKINGHAM ARTS AND MUSEUM PROJECT: $23,250 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES NOMADIC DIVISION: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WOMENS MEDIA CENTER INC: $4,622 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$2,015,200Other$674,450Youth Development$252,250Environment$249,800Human Services$249,000Crime & Legal$144,000Arts & Culture$107,872

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEmory University: $1,800,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGeorgia Campaign for Adolescent Power and Potential Inc: $165,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $135,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHOMIES UNIDOS INC: $131,000 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetGREENPEACE FUND INC: $127,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSCHOLARMATCH INC: $97,200 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC: $86,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetTHOMASVILLE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $78,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $76,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVermont Independent Media Inc: $65,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetTHE HAWKINS PROJECT: $46,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetCURIOUS COMMUNICATIONS INC: $40,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetWORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND: $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetINDIGENOUS WOMEN RISING INDIGEOUS WOMEN RISING: $28,000 over 5y, 31% of budgetEsperanza Shelter Inc: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG AUTHORS GREENHOUSE INC: $24,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetROCKINGHAM ARTS AND MUSEUM PROJECT: $23,250 over 6y, 16% of budgetTHE RAPE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBELLOWS FALLS HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $19,900 over 2y, 23% of budgetIMMIGRANT FAMILIES TOGETHER FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetWOMENS COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $18,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $17,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEAL THE BAY: $16,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF BALLONA WETLANDS: $16,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetPICO YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER: $16,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetLOS ANGELES DRAMA CLUB INC: $15,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetCLIMATE RESOLVE: $14,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGabrielino-Tongva Springs Foundation: $12,500 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetPUTNEY COMMUNITY CARES INC: $11,300 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetCLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND: $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOCEANA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVOICES FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE DESCENDANTS PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDOLORES C HUERTA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES NOMADIC DIVISION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe George Washington University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $9,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON DREAMS INC: $8,300 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPUTNEY FOODSHELF INC: $7,200 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetWE THE PEOPLE OPPORTUNITY FARM INC: $7,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTruly Living Well Ctr for Natural Urban: $6,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVeterans For Peace Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LOS ANGELES RIVER: $6,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCaptain Planet Foundation Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCoalition for Clean Air: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds Georgia Campaign for Adolescent Power and Potential Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds HOMIES UNIDOS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENPEACE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SCHOLARMATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC ↗
  • Who funds THOMASVILLE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Vermont Independent Media Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE HAWKINS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds CURIOUS COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds WORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds INDIGENOUS WOMEN RISING INDIGEOUS WOMEN RISING ↗
  • Who funds Esperanza Shelter Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG AUTHORS GREENHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKINGHAM ARTS AND MUSEUM PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE RAPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BELLOWS FALLS HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds IMMIGRANT FAMILIES TOGETHER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds HEAL THE BAY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BALLONA WETLANDS ↗
  • Who funds PICO YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES DRAMA CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATE RESOLVE ↗
  • Who funds Gabrielino-Tongva Springs Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PUTNEY COMMUNITY CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND ↗
  • Who funds AMAZON FRONTLINES ↗
  • Who funds OCEANA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors IncNY23.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Tides Foundation · California Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Annenberg Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Impactassetsinc · Resources Legacy Fund · The Ford Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Fonda Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Fonda Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Retreat Farm Ltd: 25% of income from government
  • Amherst Cinema Arts Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Fonda Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Fonda Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 99 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fonda Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph