How much did THE FLORENCE S MAHONEY FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 60% of THE FLORENCE S MAHONEY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

multiplefood needykentmedical

2021

kentfood needymeals wheels

2022

punta mitaanimal welfaresalmon riverriver clinickentmeals wheels

2023

requestedsalmon riverriver clinic

2024

boys girlsrescuehousingsalmon riverriver clinicmeals wheels

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k20 grants · $80k
$10k–50k7 grants · $80k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$3.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

SPECIAL K RANCH$15,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ST HELENA CA$15,000
SAWTOOTH VALLEY RURAL FIRE DISTRICT$10,000
AMIGOS DE ANIMALES DE SAN MIGUEL DE$10,000
UCA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION$10,000
ANGELITOS SANCTUARIO INC$10,000
WET NOSES RESCUE$10,000
PHYSICIAN'S COMMITTEE FOR RESPONSIB$6,000
SHELBURNE FARMS$5,000
THE ESSELSTYN FAMILY FOUNDATION$5,000
THE STANLEY SCHOOL PARENTS ASSOCIAT$5,000
MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM$5,000
DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK HEALTH$5,000
SAN MIGUEL COMMUNITY$5,000
ADULT RESOURCE ALLIANCE OF YELLOWST$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 17% of THE FLORENCE S MAHONEY FOUNDATION’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

THE FLORENCE S MAHONEY FOUNDATIONlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address · 9.8% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$545k · 31 repeat orgs$213k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$545k

$172k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%

-1%

Still filing today

45%

30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BB
BANDERAS BAY CHARITIES INC
4× · 2020–2023 · $53k · revenue +289%
TK
THE KENT SCHOOL
3× · 2020–2022 · $30k · revenue +18%
SHELBURNE FARMS
5× · 2020–2024 · $25k · revenue +257%

Funded once

CO
CHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPARD
one grant, 2022 · $30k
PP
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AM
one grant, 2022 · $16k
UO
UNIVERSITY OF CALIF SAN FRANCSCO FD
one grant, 2020 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Plantrician Project

To educate, equip & empower physicians & other healthcare providers about the benefits of plant-based nutrition, to produce resources to inform & inspire their patients to shift to a whole food, plant-based way of living.

Science & Tech

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic

Advancing health through research, education, clinical practice, and community partnerships; providing each person the best care in the right place, at the right time, every time.

Health

Volunteers in Medicine - San Francisco

Clinic by the bay provides free healthcare to the working uninsured in san francisco and san mateo counties. the clinic provides a caring medical home to patients through a holistic philosophy centered on compassion, wellness and dignity.

Health

Brighter Bites Inc

Brighter Bites' goal is to improve the long-term health outcomes of those they serve.

Food & Nutrition

Butte Home Health Inc

Butte home health and hospice has a special purpose in our community, driven by a commitment to help people live safely in their homes with comfort, independence, and dignity by offering the highest standards of care. we believe our…

—

Gardens for Health International

Gardens for Health International works to provide lasting agricultural solutions to chronic childhood malnutrition

International

Donor Network West

To save and improve lives through organ and tissue donation for transplantation.

—

Marin Humane Society

Improving the lives of animals and people through advocacy, education, and support.

Animals

Butte Emergency Food Bank

Provide food for individuals in need

—

Patient Access Network Foundation

As a leading charitable foundation and healthcare advocacy organization, the pan foundation is dedicated to accelerating access to treatment for those who need it most and empowering patients on their healthcare journeys. we provide…

—

Food & Friends Inc

To provide medically tailored meals and nutrition therapy to people with serious illnesses.

Health

Physician Affiliate Group of New York Pc

To offer responsive and quality healthcare to the new york community while fulfilling the educational and entrepreneurial needs of our members.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Shriners' Hospital for Children and the most unlike its peers is Kent School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/23

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,542

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

23/23

Grantees still filing

15/23

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$498,500Health$76,000Philanthropy$55,000Human Services$40,000Education$35,000Food & Nutrition$27,500Environment$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN14.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE FLORENCE S MAHONEY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

5get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PLANT BASED NUTRITION SUPPORT GROUP.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 472327443 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on PLANT BASED NUTRITION SUPPORT GROUP, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 6% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Florence S Mahoney Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Florence S Mahoney Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE FLORENCE S MAHONEY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Florence S Mahoney Foundation?

More from the funding graph

THE FLORENCE S MAHONEY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Florence S Mahoney Foundation?

More from the funding graph