Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Fletcher Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$142k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.0MHuman Services$117kFood & Nutrition$116kReligion$69kHealth$21kCommunity Improvement$19kYouth Development$15kEducation$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $90k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY ST AUGUSTINE CATHEDRAL$20,000
KALAMAZOO LOAVES & FISHES$20,000
FRIENDSHIP HOUSE$20,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH$20,000
AACORN$10,000
FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES$5,000
SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF GREATER KALAMAZOO$5,000
MINISTRY WITH COMMUNITY$5,000
COMMUNITY HOMEWORKS$5,000
CENTRICA CARE NAVIGATORS$5,000
BUILDING BLOCKS OF KALAMAZOO$5,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF KALAMAZOO$5,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER KALAMAZOO$5,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF KALAMAZOO$5,000
DISABILITY NETWORK OF SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $99k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS TOWN: $1k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $1k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $1k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $1k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $1k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $1k → 12%HOSPICE CARE OF SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN: $2k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $1k → 12%HOSPICE CARE OF SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN: $2k → 12%HOSPICE CARE OF SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN: $1k → 12%HOSPICE CARE OF SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN: $1k → 12%FRIENDSHIP HOUSE: $20k → 12%DISABILITY NETWORK OF SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN: $5k → 12%SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF GREATER KALAMAZOO: $5k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $5k → 12%SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF GREATER KALAMAZOO: $2k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $1k → 12%FIRST DAY SHOE FUND: $1k → 12%FIRST DAY SHOE FUND: $1k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $1k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $1k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $1k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $1k → 12%FIRST DAY SHOE FUND: $1k → 12%FIRST DAY SHOE FUND: $1k → 12%FIRST DAY SHOE FUND: $1k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF KALAMAZOO: $5k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $1k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF KALAMAZOO: $5k → 12%FIRST DAY SHOE FUND: $1k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF KALAMAZOO: $5k → 12%FIRST DAY SHOE FUND: $1k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $1k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $1k → 12%CENTRICA CARE NAVIGATORS: $5k → 12%CENTRICA CARE NAVIGATORS: $2k → 12%CENTRICA CARE NAVIGATORS: $2k → 12%CENTRICA CARE NAVIGATORS: $2k → 12%CENTRICA CARE NAVIGATORS: $2k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF KALAMAZOO: $5k → 12%FIRST DAY SHOE FUND: $2k → 12%FIRST DAY SHOE FUND: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$298k · 17 repeat orgs$84k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
4

Total granted

$298k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
0%

Still filing today

65%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KL
    KALAMAZOO LOAVES & FISHES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $85k · revenue +63%
  • CF
    CATHOLIC FAMILY SERVICES
    4× · 2022–2025 · $20k · revenue +1%
  • HC
    Hospice Care of Southwest Michigan
    9× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • FC
    FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF KALAMAZOO
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • TR
    TRAUMA RECOVERY ASSOCIATES
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -91%
  • HF
    HOLY FAMILY HEALTHCARE
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kalamazoo Housing Advocates

Kalamazoo housing advocate is a nonprofit working to break the cycle of homelessness in kalamazoo county.

Human Services
2
Catholic Human Services Inc

Catholic human services inc. enhances the lives of those we serve by providing hope-filled social, emotional and spiritual support to all people.

Human Services
3
South County Community Services

South county community services (sccs) is the only human service agency dedicated to serving the 25,000 residents who live in the southern tier of kalamazoo county. with a mission to work with families to improve quality of life, the…

—
4
Catholic Charities West Michigan

Inspired by the church's social teachings, catholic charities west michigan fosters individuals and families to flourish by providing help and creating hope.

—
5
Kalamazoo Animal Rescue

To provide refuge and care to homeless, stray, and unwanted cats and dogs.

Animals
6
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

—
7
Kalamazoo Valley Habitat for Humanity Inc

Acquiring land and homes for the purpose of building new homes, and renovating existing homes to sell to very low income families under interest free land contracts or mortgages. the homes are located in urban areas of kalamazoo county,…

Housing & Shelter
8
Kalamazoo Mortgage Hero Salute
Public Benefit
9
Klamath Child & Family Treatment Center Inc

Our values and mission vision: sharing the power of mental wellbeing mission: providing compassionate care throughout our community core values: dignity - we treat everyone as individuals and with respect. stewardship - we are trusted…

Health
10
Catholic Family Service

Counseling individuals and families and foster care services.

—
11
Kalamazoo Family Nonprofit Housing Corporation

Kalamazoo Family Nonprofit Housing Corporation (FAMILY) was created for the exclusive purpose of providing housing facilities or persons of low income, or for persons whose income does not exceed limits established by federal guidelines…

Housing & Shelter
12
New Genesis Inc

New genesis, inc. is committed to positively impacting lives in southwest michigan. new genesis is a youth and family services organization whose mission is to transform lives through programs and services that effectively meet expressed…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Family Services; the most unlike its peers is Trauma Recovery Associates. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN: $1,000,000 · ReligionCATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF MICHIGANCARING NETWORK CATHOLIC FAMILY SERVICES: $25,000 · OtherCARING NETW…AACORN: $20,000 · OtherAACORNST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY ST AUGUSTINE CATHEDRAL: $20,000 · OtherST VINCENT …ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherST VINCENT …CAPUCHIN SOUP KITCHEN: $16,500 · OtherCAPUCHIN SO…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF KALAMAZOO: $13,000 · OtherCOMMUNITIES…KALAMAZOO GOSPEL MISSION: $11,000 · OtherKALAMAZOO G…SHEPHERD'S CENTER: $9,500 · OtherSHEPHERD'S …+4 more: $10,000 · Other+4 moreKALAMAZOO LOAVES & FISHES INC: $85,000 · Food & NutritionMINISTRY WITH COMMUNITY INC: $14,000 · Food & NutritionCATHOLIC FAMILY SERVICES: $20,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHIP HOUSE: $20,000 · Human ServicesHospice Care of Southwest Michigan: $16,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES INC: $13,000 · Human ServicesFIRST DAY SHOE FUND: $11,000 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $7,000 · Human ServicesSHEPHERD'S CENTER OF GREATER KALAMAZOO: $6,500 · Human ServicesDISABILITY NETWORK SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN: $5,000 · Human ServicesST MARY - ST PAUL MINISTRY: $11,000 · Community ImprovementBUILDING BLOCKS OF KALAMAZOO: $5,000 · Community ImprovementBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF KALAMAZOO INC: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY HOMEWORKS INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterTRAUMA RECOVERY ASSOCIATES: $2,500 · Health
Religion$1,000,000Other$145,000Food & Nutrition$99,000Human Services$98,500Community Improvement$16,000Youth Development$15,000Housing & Shelter$5,000Health$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN: $1,000,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetKALAMAZOO LOAVES & FISHES INC: $85,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCATHOLIC FAMILY SERVICES: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HOUSE: $20,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetHospice Care of Southwest Michigan: $16,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF KALAMAZOO INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMINISTRY WITH COMMUNITY INC: $14,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF KALAMAZOO: $13,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES INC: $13,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY - ST PAUL MINISTRY: $11,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetFIRST DAY SHOE FUND: $11,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSHEPHERD'S CENTER OF GREATER KALAMAZOO: $6,500 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetDISABILITY NETWORK SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRAUMA RECOVERY ASSOCIATES: $2,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHOLY FAMILY HEALTHCARE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Hospice Care of Southwest Michigan ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF KALAMAZOO INC ↗
  • Who funds MINISTRY WITH COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF KALAMAZOO ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY - ST PAUL MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds FIRST DAY SHOE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF GREATER KALAMAZOO ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING BLOCKS OF KALAMAZOO ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOMEWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds DISABILITY NETWORK SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds TRAUMA RECOVERY ASSOCIATES ↗
  • Who funds HOLY FAMILY HEALTHCARE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kalamazoo Community FoundationMI34.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kalamazoo Community Foundation · Dorothy U Dalton Foundation Inc · Tyler-Little Family Foundation · Harold and Grace Upjohn Foundation · Irving S Gilmore Foundation · United Way of South Central Michigan · Marvin and Rosalie Okun Foundation · John E Fetzer Institute Inc · H P & Genevieve Connable Fund · The Burdick-Thorne Foundation · Suzanne Upjohn Delano Parish Foundation · The Ronda E Stryker and William D Johnston Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Fletcher Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Fletcher Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Fletcher Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Fletcher Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fletcher’s filings →

    More from the funding graph