Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Firmenich Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$162k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$113k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.6MInternational$796kEducation$368kFood & Nutrition$308kEnvironment$292kCommunity Improvement$208kHuman Services$106kRecreation & Sports$95kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $113k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$85k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAITI PROJECT SCHOOL OF DEBOUCHETTE$113,260
THE FRESH AIR FUND$25,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CHILD WELLNESS INSTITUTES$5,000
JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDRENS FUND$2,500
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 60% of grant dollars ($2.4M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 40% that went abroad ($1.6M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YOUTH IN NEED: $5k → 5%VISION FOR CHILDREN AT RISK: $5k → 21%SHARE MY MEALS: $10k → 11%SHARE MY MEALS: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
MI
NY
OH
NJ
CA
MO
VA
DC
GA
FL

Beyond the US: 40% of all-years giving ($1.6M)

23 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Haiti$556k · 10 grants
Switzerland$225k · 14 grants
France$203k · 9 grants
Madagascar$200k · 1 grant
United Kingdom$57k · 7 grants
Guatemala$57k · 1 grant
Indonesia$40k · 1 grant
Singapore$30k · 5 grants
Germany$25k · 3 grants
Austria$22k · 3 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of The Firmenich Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Firmenich Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 42% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 35 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
74

Total granted

$2.6M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-1%

Still filing today

26%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionEducationHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +40%
  • FI
    FASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2024 · $164k · revenue +26%
  • SHARE MY MEALS INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $15k · revenue +594%

Funded once

  • VF
    VANILLA FARMING AND AGRICULTURE
    one grant, 2019 · $200k
  • CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $90k · revenue +123%
  • AD
    ASSN DEUX MAINS LES DOCS
    one grant, 2017 · $84k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
2
American Institute for Cancer Research

Aicr champions the latest and most authoritative scientific research from around the world on cancer prevention and survival through diet, weight and physical activity, so that we can help people make informed lifestyle choices to reduce…

Health
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
5
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
6
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
7
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
8
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
9
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
10
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
11
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
12
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Create a Smile. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 111 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/32
Grantees still filing
16/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HAITI PROJECT SCHOOL OF DEBOUCHETTE: $485,559 · OtherHAITI PROJECT SCHOOL OF DEBOUCHETTEVANILLA FARMING AND AGRICULTURE: $200,000 · OtherVANILLA FARMING AND AGRICULTUREFASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION: $163,771 · OtherFASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $102,413 · OtherASSN DEUX MAINS LES DOCS: $84,215 · Other+87 more: $1,406,262 · Other+87 moreTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $1,106,700 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUN…+1 more: $10,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · EducationWEXNER CENTER FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationPRATT INSTITUTE: $8,500 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $90,000 · EnvironmentTHE RAINFOREST FUND INC: $55,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $32,250 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $10,500 · HealthBIOBUS INC: $10,000 · HealthPINK RIBBON RIDERS: $7,500 · HealthNEXT FOR AUTISM INC: $5,000 · Health+1 more: $1,216 · HealthJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $15,000 · Food & NutritionTABLE TO TABLE INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY SENIORSERV INC: $8,000 · Food & NutritionKID PACK INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionFRESH AIR FUND: $25,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$2,442,220Public Safety & Disaster$1,116,700Education$163,500Environment$145,000Health$66,466Food & Nutrition$38,000Recreation & Sports$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $1,106,700 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetFASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION: $163,771 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $90,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RAINFOREST FUND INC: $55,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWEXNER CENTER FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $32,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD WELLNESS INSTITUTE INC: $25,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE MY MEALS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCREATE A SMILE: $15,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLIMATE CENTRAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTABLE TO TABLE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIOBUS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPRATT INSTITUTE: $8,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY SENIORSERV INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPINK RIBBON RIDERS: $7,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNEXT FOR AUTISM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCONSERVE WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOMEFRONT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKID PACK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCASA FOR CHILDREN OF ESSEX COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLifeTies Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYOUTH IN NEED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVISION FOR CHILDREN AT RISK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE JAMES E MARSHALL OCD FOUNDATION INC: $4,700 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,216 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE RAINFOREST FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds WEXNER CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRESH AIR FUND ↗
  • Who funds CHILD WELLNESS INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation IncNJ15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Firmenich Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Firmenich Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Conserve Wildlife Foundation of New Jersey Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Homefront Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Global Empowerment Mission Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 111 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Firmenich’s filings →

More from the funding graph