Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Finzen-Clark Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Benefit$85kEducation$79kHealth$25kArts & Culture$7kHousing & Shelter$500Religion$500Food & Nutrition$250
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$184k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KU ENDOWMENT - THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS$5,500
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$5,500
OVARIAN CANCER RESARCH ALLIANCE$4,000
EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$4,000
CAPITAL CARING HOSPICE$2,000
LA THEATRE WORKS$1,500
BISHOP O'GORMAN CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAPITAL CARING HOSPICE: $2k → 6%CAPITAL CARING HOSPICE: $2k → 6%CAPITAL CARING: $1k → 6%CAPITAL CARING: $1k → 6%CAPITAL CARING HOSPICE: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
NY
SD
CA
VA
KS
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$188k · 12 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$188k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-12%
+80%

Still filing today

42%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPublic BenefitHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY
    7× · 2017–2023 · $85k · revenue -91%
  • KU
    KANSAS UNIVERSITY SCHOLARSHIP
    7× · 2017–2023 · $18k
  • KS
    KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOLARSHIP
    7× · 2017–2023 · $18k

Funded once

  • TC
    TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +80%
  • CC
    CLOUD COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $500 · revenue +6%
  • TI
    THE INSTITUTE OF THEOLOGICAL AND INTERDISC STUD
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
2
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
3
Califonia State University East Bay Foundation Inc

Csu east bay foundation is an auxiliary organization of california state university east bay and the california state university system. the organization's mission is to provide services that aid, supplement, and advance the educational…

Education
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
6
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
7
Colorado State University Foundation

See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…

Education
8
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
9
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
10
Community College of Philadelphia Foundation

The community college of philadelphia (ccp) foundation enhances and enriches the educational experiences of community college of philadelphia students by providing external resources to support the college's mission. as the private fund…

Education
11
Dallas College Foundation Inc

Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.

Education
12
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emporia State University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY: $85,000 · Public BenefitTHE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITYKANSAS UNIVERSITY SCHOLARSHIP: $17,500 · OtherKANSAS UNIVERSITY SCHOLARSHIPKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOLARSHIP: $17,500 · OtherKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOLARSHIPIndividual grant recipient: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKU ENDOWMENT - THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS: $10,500 · OtherKU ENDOWMENT - THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSASL A THEATRE WORKS: $7,000 · OtherL A THEATRE WORKSOVARIAN CANCER RESARCH ALLIANCE: $5,500 · OtherOVARIAN CANCER RESARCH ALLIANCEOVARIAN CANCER RESARCH FUND ALLIANCE: $5,000 · OtherOVARIAN CANCER RESARCH FUND ALLIANCETHE ELLINGTON FUND: $4,750 · OtherTHE ELLINGTON FUNDOVARIAN CANCER NATIONAL ALLIANCE: $3,750 · Other+4 more: $1,700 · OtherKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,500 · EducationKANSAS STA…EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $7,000 · EducationEMPORIA ST…+1 more: $500 · EducationCapital Hospice: $10,750 · Human ServicesSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $250 · Food & Nutrition
Public Benefit$85,000Other$83,700Education$18,000Human Services$10,750Food & Nutrition$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY: $85,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCapital Hospice: $10,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetL A THEATRE WORKS: $7,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ELLINGTON FUND: $4,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLOUD COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY ↗
  • Who funds Capital Hospice ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds L A THEATRE WORKS ↗
  • Who funds THE ELLINGTON FUND ↗
  • Who funds TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds CLOUD COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Finzen-Clark Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Finzen-Clark Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Capital Hospice: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Finzen-Clark Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph