Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Field-Stephen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$1.0M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

91% of The Field-Stephen Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year The Field-Stephen Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $1M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
’20
5
’21
5
’22
6
’23
7
’24
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$1.3MArts & Culture$341kRecreation & Sports$178kInternational$91kEducation$15kHuman Services$11kHousing & Shelter$8kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIFTH CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST WASHINGTON DC$1,000,000
ADVENTURE UNLIMITED$100,000
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SCHOOL OF JOURNALISM$50,000
SIXTH CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST WASHINGTON DC$20,000
REFUGEES INTERNATIONAL$15,000
LYNN HOUSE OF THE POTOMAC$10,000
INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR JOURNALISTS$10,000
CAMPS NEWFOUND AND OWATONNA$10,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN$5,000
FRIENDSHIP PLACE$5,000
CHRIST CHURCH GEORGETOWN EPISCOPAL$5,000
FOOD & FRIENDS$5,000
CHERISHABILITY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHERISHABILITY: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 15 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

$2.0M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+9%

Still filing today

47%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AU
    ADVENTURE UNLIMITED
    4× · 2021–2024 · $153k · revenue +15%
  • PF
    PEN FAULKNER FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $68k · revenue +20%
  • RI
    REFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $55k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • TC
    Teachers College Columbia University
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists Inc

International consortium of investigative journalists, inc.'s (icij) mission is to show people how the world really works through stories that rock the world; forcing positive change.

International
2
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
3
Institute of Food Technologists

As an organization, the institute of food technologists is focusing its work in four main areas, or "roles and goals." each is wide-reaching and helps to advance our mission.steward for the profession and its community - provide learning,…

—
4
Council On Foreign Relations Inc

The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…

International
5
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
6
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
7
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
8
The Fund for Peace Inc

Building bridges across diverse sectors, and developing innovative technologies and tools for policy makers. a leader in the conflict assessment and early warning field, the fund for peace focuses on the problems of weak and failing…

International
9
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
10
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
11
Open Technology Fund

The open technology fund aims to advance internet freedom globally by supporting the research, development, implementation, and maintenance of technologies that provide secure and uncensored access to the internet.

Arts & Culture
12
Columbia University Press

Enhance Columbia University's education mission by acquiring and publishing outstanding original works by scholars and others that contribute to an understanding of global human concerns. Columbia University Press became part of the…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust; the most unlike its peers is Teachers College Columbia University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIFTH CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST WASHINGTON DC: $1,080,000 · OtherFIFTH CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST WASHINGTON DCCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SCHOOL OF JOURNALISM: $260,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SCHOOL OF JOURNALISMFIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST BOSTON: $95,000 · OtherFIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST BOSTONPEN FAULKNER FOUNDATION: $68,000 · Other+8 more: $176,000 · Other+8 moreNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $1,197,956 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTSave The Children Federation Inc: $105,000 · InternationalREFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC: $55,000 · InternationalTHE INT'L CENTER FOR JOURNALISTS INC: $31,000 · InternationalADVENTURE UNLIMITED: $153,000 · Recreation & SportsTeachers College Columbia University: $15,000 · EducationLONGYEAR FOUNDATION: $13,000 · Arts & CultureFriendship Place: $8,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,679,000Philanthropy$1,197,956International$191,000Recreation & Sports$153,000Education$15,000Arts & Culture$13,000Housing & Shelter$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $1,197,956 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADVENTURE UNLIMITED: $153,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $105,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEN FAULKNER FOUNDATION: $68,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetREFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC: $55,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE INT'L CENTER FOR JOURNALISTS INC: $31,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTeachers College Columbia University: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLONGYEAR FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFriendship Place: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHERISHABILITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFOOD & FRIENDS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds ADVENTURE UNLIMITED ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds PEN FAULKNER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INT'L CENTER FOR JOURNALISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Teachers College Columbia University ↗
  • Who funds LONGYEAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Friendship Place ↗
  • Who funds CHERISHABILITY ↗
  • Who funds FOOD & FRIENDS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renaissance Charitable Foundation IncIN12× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Field-Stephen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Field-Stephen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Field-Stephen Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Field-Stephen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Field-Stephen’s filings →

More from the funding graph