Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Fennie Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$54kReligion$15kRecreation & Sports$13kHealth$13kEducation$6kHuman Services$1k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$235k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NC TEXTILE FOUNDATION INC$9,500
UNC GREENSBORO GOLF TEAM$2,000
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM FOUNDATION$2,000
HORSEPOWER THERAPEUTIC LEARNING CENTER$1,000
ALPENA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$1,000
MOTHERS AGAINST CANCER$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FREE THE CAPTIVES: $500 → 9%HORSEPOWER THERAPEUTIC LEARNING CENTER: $1k → 16%HORSEPOWER THERAPEUTIC LEARNING CENTER: $1k → 16%HORSEPOWER THERAPEUTIC LEARNING CENTER: $1k → 16%HORSEPOWER THERAPEUTIC LEARNING CENTER: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$95k · 9 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$95k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+8%

Still filing today

22%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NT
    NC TEXTILE FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $54k
  • UG
    UNC GREENSBORO GOLF TEAM
    5× · 2021–2025 · $11k
  • SP
    ST PIUS X CHURCH
    5× · 2018–2022 · $10k

Funded once

  • SP
    ST PIUS X BUILDING FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • AS
    APPALACHIAN STATE WOMEN'S GOLF TEAM
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • FT
    FREE THE CAPTIVES
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue -86%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolinas Golf Association

The cga is a non-profit service organization that was formed in 1909 to conduct championships and tournaments for amateur golfers in north and south carolina, administer the usga handicap system in the carolinas, and support its membership…

Recreation & Sports
2
The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation

The foundation's exempt purpose is to encourage, foster, support, and conduct activities and programs which will benefit children residing within texas.

—
3
Greater Houston Cycling Foundation

Public charity. Greater Houston Cycling Foundation (GHCF) is a sports non-profit organized and operated exclusively for charitable and educational purposes. GHCF is focused on education and skill development, and fosters national amateur…

Recreation & Sports
4
The Texas Golf Association Foundation

To promote and expand community awareness of the game of golf in texas through programs serving junior golfers and the community at large.

—
5
Heb Tournament of Champions Charitable Trust
Philanthropy
6
Hannon Cup Association

The Hannon Cup Association is dedicated to organizing and promoting the growth of golf in Austin through scholarships following the values and legacy of Coach Hannon by raising funds to provide educational financial assistance to…

Education
7
Texas Premier Soccer Club

Texas Premier Soccer Club is a nonprofit organization committed to providing affordable, high-level soccer training and competitive opportunities for youth players through coaching, league play, tournaments, camps, and community-based…

Recreation & Sports
8
Young Texans Against Cancer

Young texans against cancer (ytac) is an independent, nonprofit organization comprised of men and women who have been affected by cancer or are seeking to become more actively involved in the cancer community. our organization is focused…

—
9
Harmon Family Foundation (Fka the Claude Harmon Foundation)
—
10
Texas Special Children's Projects Inc

To enrich the lives of handicapped, disabled, and special needs individuals by providing quality recreational, entertainment and activity projects year round.

Human Services
11
Amateur Golf Alliance

Our mission is to provide the championship with its playability and unique hole designs in the dfw area. we also offer the players golf courses to support and promote amateur golfers with more opportunities to compete at national and…

Recreation & Sports
12
Junior Cup Golf

Provide developmental opportunities for junior golfers to play and learn the game of golf. activities include forming community based junior golf teams to train and compete together as well as hosting instructional clinics.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greensboro Sports Council; the most unlike its peers is Free the Captives. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NC TEXTILE FOUNDATION INC: $53,500 · OtherNC TEXTILE FOUNDATION INCUNC GREENSBORO GOLF TEAM: $11,000 · OtherUNC GREENSBORO GOLF TEAMST PIUS X CHURCH: $9,500 · OtherST PIUS X CHURCHUNC GREENSBORO: $5,000 · OtherUNC GREENSBOROHOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM FOUNDATION+6 more: $7,750 · Other+6 moreHORSEPOWER INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesFREE THE CAPTIVES: $500 · Human ServicesMOTHERS AGAINST CANCER: $3,500 · HealthALPENA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationLANCASTER PRESCHOOL: $250 · EducationSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $300 · Recreation & Sports
Other$91,750Human Services$4,500Health$3,500Education$1,250Recreation & Sports$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHORSEPOWER INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMOTHERS AGAINST CANCER: $3,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetALPENA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFREE THE CAPTIVES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAROLINAS GOLF FOUNDATION: $450 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLANCASTER PRESCHOOL: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENSBORO SPORTS COUNCIL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HORSEPOWER INC ↗
  • Who funds MOTHERS AGAINST CANCER ↗
  • Who funds ALPENA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FREE THE CAPTIVES ↗
  • Who funds CAROLINAS GOLF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER PRESCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds GREENSBORO SPORTS COUNCIL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro IncNC13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Fennie Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Fennie Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fennie Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph