Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Feinberg Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$488k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$380k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$2.4MEducation$488kHealth$323kHuman Services$37kInternational$18kHousing & Shelter$13k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $380k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHINGTON PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY$380,000
COLUMBIA LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND$50,000
JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$10,000
NATIONAL SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$10,000
CONNECTICUT COLLEGE$10,000
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND$10,000
LIVE IT LEARN IT$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $302k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 7%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $10k → 8%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 7%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $10k → 8%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 7%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $10k → 8%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $5k → 8%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $2k → 8%COLUMBIA LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $50k → 14%COLUMBIA LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $50k → 14%COLUMBIA LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $50k → 14%COLUMBIA LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 14%COLUMBIA LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $20k → 14%COLUMBIA LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $20k → 14%COLUMBIA LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 9 repeat orgs$155k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$3.0M
$155k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+1%

Still filing today

78%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WP
    WASHINGTON PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +45%
  • CC
    CONNECTICUT COLLEGE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $360k · revenue +23%
  • CL
    COLUMBIA LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND
    7× · 2018–2024 · $235k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • KNEISEL HALLgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $125k · revenue +260%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +1%
  • SI
    SOME INC
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue -24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
6
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
7
University of Hartford

Dedicated to learning, personal growth, knowledge creation, and the betterment of society. the university engages students in aquiring the knowledge, skills, and values necessary to thrive in and contribute to a pluralistic, complex world.

Education
8
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
9
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
11
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
12
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Washington Performing Arts Society; the most unlike its peers is American Foundation for the Blind Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WASHINGTON PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY: $1,767,500 · Arts & CultureWASHINGTON PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETYKNEISEL HALL: $125,000 · Arts & CultureKNEISEL HALLNATIONAL SYMPHONY ORCH ASSN OF WASHINGTON DC: $80,000 · Arts & CultureCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $360,000 · EducationCONNECTICUT COLLEGELive It Learn It: $128,000 · EducationLive It Learn ItPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $110,000 · EducationPresident and Fellow…WALTERS ART MUSEUM: $325,000 · OtherWALTERS ART …PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $38,000 · OtherPLANNED PARE…+1 more: $12,500 · OtherCOLUMBIA LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $235,000 · Human ServicesCOLUMBIA LI…AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FO…JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $37,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH SOCI…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $12,500 · InternationalHIAS INC: $5,000 · International
Arts & Culture$1,972,500Education$598,000Other$375,500Human Services$322,000International$17,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY: $1,767,500 over 8y, 4.4% of budgetCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $360,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $235,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetLive It Learn It: $128,000 over 7y, 3.8% of budgetKNEISEL HALL: $125,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $110,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL SYMPHONY ORCH ASSN OF WASHINGTON DC: $80,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $50,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $37,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOME INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WASHINGTON PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds Live It Learn It ↗
  • Who funds KNEISEL HALL ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL SYMPHONY ORCH ASSN OF WASHINGTON DC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Feinberg Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Feinberg Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Jewish Social Service Agency: 1% of income from government
  • Connecticut College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Feinberg’s filings →

More from the funding graph