Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Fann Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$103k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$213kHousing & Shelter$208kEducation$204kFood & Nutrition$109kReligion$97kHealth$17kAnimals$1k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIDGE OF HOPE INC$15,000
SAFE HARBOR OF CHESTER COUNTY INC$10,000
CALVARY EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH$10,000
CLEVELAND LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION$10,000
WEST CHESTER FOOD CUPBOARD$10,000
UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC$10,000
A HAVEN$10,000
CARE CENTER FOUNDATION INC$7,500
TRAVIS MANION FOUNDATION$5,000
PHILABUNDANCE$5,000
WITTENBERG COLLEGE BOARD OF DIRECTORS$5,000
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF PHILADELPHIA AND SUSQUEH$3,000
CLEVELAND LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BRIDGE OF HOPE INC: $20k → 6%BRIDGE OF HOPE INC: $15k → 6%BRIDGE OF HOPE INC: $15k → 6%BRIDGE OF HOPE INC: $15k → 6%BRIDGE OF HOPE INC: $15k → 6%BRIDGE OF HOPE INC: $15k → 6%GOOD SAMARITAN SERVICES: $15k → 6%GOOD SAMARITAN SERVICES: $15k → 6%BRIDGE OF HOPE INC: $15k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$944k · 14 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$944k
$6k

Still filing today

79%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionHealthHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BO
    BRIDGE OF HOPE INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $110k · revenue +465%
  • SH
    SAFE HARBOR OF CHESTER COUNTY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $93k · revenue +68%
  • AH
    A HAVEN
    8× · 2018–2025 · $90k · revenue +439%

Funded once

  • WI
    WWP INC - WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • AC
    ANIMAL CARE ASSOCIATION INC SPCA
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Pgh

Catholic charities serves to not only meet the immediate needs of the vulnerable within our communities but to provide solutions that embrace a path to stability for those we are privileged to serve. catholic charities is the primary…

Human Services
2
Chester County Food Bank

We mobilize and educate our community to ensure equitable access to nutritious and familiar food. we do this by raising, and soliciting funds for the acquisition, storage, growing, collection and distribution of food to low income citizens…

Food & Nutrition
3
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
4
Hospice of Central Pennsylvania

Our vision is a community that embraces specialized care at the end of life with the same importance that is given at the beginning of life. our guiding principles are service - to make a difference in the lives of our patients/families,…

Human Services
5
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

—
6
West Side Catholic Center

The west side catholic center provides food, clothing, shelter, and advocacy to all who come to us in need. through various programs, we serve the homeless and indigent of cleveland, ohio.

Human Services
7
Share Food Program

As the largest serving hunger-relief organization in the greater philadelphia region, share food program's mission is reducing regional food insecurity by providing nourishing food to a network of community-based partners and directly to…

Food & Nutrition
8
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
9
Upmc Western Maryland Corporation

The mission of upmc western maryland is to serve our community by providing outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health system through clinical & technological innovation, research and education.

Health
10
Tandem Living

The christ-centered mission of tandem living is to partner with and support vibrant senior living communities where residents pursue their passions, deepen their relationships, prioritize their wellness, and live fully at every age.

Housing & Shelter
11
The Christ Hospital

Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.

Health
12
Feeding Westchester Inc

Driven by the belief that access to healthy food is a basic right for all people, feeding westchester leads hunger action programs and mobilizes the resources needed to eradicate hunger in westchester county.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe Harbor of Chester County Inc; the most unlike its peers is A Haven. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLEVELAND LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $108,000 · OtherCLEVELAND LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL ASSOC…CALVARY EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $107,000 · OtherCALVARY EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCHTHE CARE CENTER FOUNDATION: $75,000 · OtherTHE CARE CENTER FOUNDATIONMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF PHILADELPHIA AND SUSQUEH: $13,000 · Other+2 more: $6,000 · OtherBRIDGE OF HOPE INC: $110,000 · Human ServicesBRIDGE OF HOPE I…GOOD SAMARITAN SERVICES: $30,000 · Human ServicesGOOD SAMARITAN S…WEST CHESTER FOOD CUPBOARD: $75,000 · Food & NutritionWEST CHESTER F…Philabundance: $49,000 · Food & NutritionPhilabundanceUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $77,500 · EducationUNITED NEGRO C…THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE: $45,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF D…A HAVEN: $90,000 · HealthA HAVENST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $17,000 · HealthST JUDE CHIL…SAFE HARBOR OF CHESTER COUNTY INC: $92,500 · Housing & ShelterSAFE HARBOR…Travis Manion Foundation: $55,000 · Philanthropy
Other$309,000Human Services$140,000Food & Nutrition$124,000Education$122,500Health$107,000Housing & Shelter$92,500Philanthropy$55,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRIDGE OF HOPE INC: $110,000 over 7y, 3.2% of budgetSAFE HARBOR OF CHESTER COUNTY INC: $92,500 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetA HAVEN: $90,000 over 8y, 22% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $77,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWEST CHESTER FOOD CUPBOARD: $75,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CARE CENTER FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 9y, 10% of budgetTravis Manion Foundation: $55,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPhilabundance: $49,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN SERVICES: $30,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRIDGE OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR OF CHESTER COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds A HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST CHESTER FOOD CUPBOARD ↗
  • Who funds THE CARE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Travis Manion Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Chester County IncPA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Chester County Inc · Chester County Community Foundation · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Fann Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Fann Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Fann Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Fann Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fann Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph