Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

The Fairness Project

Promoting general social welfare of the community through the use of, and education around, ballot measures advancing economic and social equity.

$27M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
11
Grants FY2024
6
Organizations funded FY2023
100%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$935,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$16,400,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 13
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
7
Total assets, FY2024
$4.3M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 100% of the organizations The Fairness Project funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Civil RightsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving11$27M73%
FY20236$6.6M100%
FY20228$1.6M88%
FY20214$521k100%
FY20206$1.5M83%
FY20191$285k0%
FY201810$5.4M60%
FY201713$3.0Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Civil Rights$28MHealth$8.9MEmployment$2.5MPublic Benefit$2.3MHuman Services$2.1MCrime & Legal$1.1MEnvironment$1.1MPhilanthropy$235kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
ID
MT
ND
MI
MA
SD
OH
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
AZ
NM
AR
DC
MS
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Floridians Protecting Freedom$16,400,000117%
Missourians for Constitutional Freedom$4,450,000168%
Utah Decides Healthcare$3,763,9613n/a
Arizona for Abortion Access$3,560,0002n/a
Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights$2,800,00017%
Nebraskans for Reproductive Freedom$1,500,000113%
Better Jobs for Alaska Inc$1,430,000186%
Montanans Securing Reproductive Rights$1,250,00017%
Insure the Good Life$1,096,8291n/a
Black Progressive Action Coalition$935,0002n/a
Show all 49 grantees
All grantees of The Fairness Project by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Floridians Protecting Freedom$16,400,000117%
Missourians for Constitutional Freedom$4,450,000168%
Utah Decides Healthcare$3,763,9613n/a
Arizona for Abortion Access$3,560,0002n/a
Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights$2,800,00017%
Nebraskans for Reproductive Freedom$1,500,000113%
Better Jobs for Alaska Inc$1,430,000186%
Montanans Securing Reproductive Rights$1,250,00017%
Insure the Good Life$1,096,8291n/a
Black Progressive Action Coalition$935,0002n/a
Maine Equal Justice Project$621,000133%
Families USA Foundation Inc$600,00019%
Ohioans for Reproductive Freedom PAC$500,00016%
North Dakota Citizens Protecting the Constitution$456,452144%
Protect AR Constitution$450,000156%
One Person One Vote$445,00012%
Forward Action Fund$435,00012%
Missourians for Healthy Families and Fai$375,000215%
Idahoans for Healthcare$337,9461n/a
Montana Hospital Association$325,00013%
Mi Time to Care$300,000225%
Raise the Wage Nebraska$265,00019%
Will of the People Arizona$250,00018%
South Dakotans for Fair Elections$250,000115%
Nebraskans for Paid Sick Leave$250,000255%
Maine People's Alliance$241,00026%
Raise Up Missouri$235,0002n/a
Defend Alaska's Care$221,5061n/a
Healthcare for Alaska$221,5061n/a
Demand Justice$221,23914%
Demand Justice PAC$200,0001n/a
Equity PAC$200,0001n/a
Colorado Families First$200,00012%
Missourians for Healthcare$200,00013%
South Dakotans Decide Healthcare$110,00014%
Lincoln for Fair Housing$100,0001n/a
Arkansans for a Fair Wage$100,0001n/a
Yes on Measure A for Sheriff Accountability Sponsored by Civil and$100,000124%
Utah Health Policy Project$75,80027%
Vermont for Reproductive Liberty Ballot Committee Inc$50,00013%
Healthy Workforce Abq$50,0001n/a
Healthcare For Mississippi$50,0001n/a
Tucson Fight for 15$50,0001n/a
Raise Up Massachusetts$20,0001n/a
Mainers for Home Care$20,00012%
Arizona Wins$14,0001n/a
Protect Majority Rule$12,886110%
Nebraska Appleseed Action Fund$10,00015%
Ballot Initiative Strategy Center Inc$7,50010%

Where it is load-bearing

The Fairness Project supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 7 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 32 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFloridians Protecting Freedom: $16,400,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetMissourians for Constitutional Freedom: $4,450,000 over 1y, 68% of budgetOhioans United for Reproductive Rights: $2,800,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetNebraskans for Reproductive Freedom: $1,500,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetBetter Jobs for Alaska Inc: $1,430,000 over 1y, 86% of budgetMontanans Securing Reproductive Rights: $1,250,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetMaine Equal Justice Project: $621,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetFamilies USA Foundation Inc: $600,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetOhioans for Reproductive Freedom PAC: $500,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetNorth Dakota Citizens Protecting the Constitution: $456,452 over 1y, 44% of budgetProtect AR Constitution: $450,000 over 1y, 56% of budgetOne Person One Vote: $445,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetForward Action Fund: $435,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetMissourians for Healthy Families and Fai: $375,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetMontana Hospital Association: $325,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetMi Time to Care: $300,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetRaise the Wage Nebraska: $265,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetWill of the People Arizona: $250,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetSouth Dakotans for Fair Elections: $250,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetNebraskans for Paid Sick Leave: $250,000 over 2y, 55% of budgetMaine People's Alliance: $241,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetDemand Justice: $221,239 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetColorado Families First: $200,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMissourians for Healthcare: $200,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetSouth Dakotans Decide Healthcare: $110,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetYes on Measure A for Sheriff Accountability Sponsored by Civil and: $100,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetUtah Health Policy Project: $75,800 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetVermont for Reproductive Liberty Ballot Committee Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetMainers for Home Care: $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetProtect Majority Rule: $12,886 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetNebraska Appleseed Action Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetBallot Initiative Strategy Center Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 32.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sixteen Thirty FundDC55.3× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sixteen Thirty Fund · Open Society Action Fund Inc · American Civil Liberties Union Inc · Advocacy Action Fund Inc · Planned Parenthood Action Fund Inc · Hopewell Fund · Global Impact Social Welfare Fund · North Fund · Think Big America · Instructional Telecommunications Foundation Inc · Our American Future Action · Tides Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Fairness Project with peer funders

About The Fairness Project

How much does The Fairness Project give?
The Fairness Project reported 11 grants totaling $26,909,338 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 13 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does The Fairness Project fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Civil Rights (61%), Health (19%), Employment (5%).
Who are The Fairness Project's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Floridians Protecting Freedom ($16M), Missourians for Constitutional Freedom ($4.5M), Utah Decides Healthcare ($3.8M).
Does The Fairness Project fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Fairness Project?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Sixteen Thirty Fund, Open Society Action Fund Inc, American Civil Liberties Union Inc.
Where is The Fairness Project based?
The Fairness Project is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fairness Project’s filings →

More from the funding graph