Skip to content

· Private foundation

The F&V Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$47kPublic Benefit$25kRecreation & Sports$22kArts & Culture$9kCommunity Improvement$7kEnvironment$5kInternational$2kHuman Services$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MICHIGAN TECH FUND$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
CITY OF ANDERSON$6,000
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING$5,000
CITY OF PORTLAND$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
THE RIGHT PLACE FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $250 → 8%WTS MICHIGAN CHAPTER: $400 → 9%AIRPORT NIEDERMEIER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO: $250 → 10%COGNITION: $500 → 10%THE RIGHT PLACE FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%VILLAGE OF MUIR: $5k → 12%WMMIAEC: $2k → 12%VILLAGE OF BRECKENRIDGE: $8k → 12%CADILLAC AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $500 → 13%LEONI TOWNSHIP: $8k → 13%THREE RIVERS PROMISE: $1k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING: $250 → 14%CITY OF SPRINGFIELD: $500 → 14%CITY OF CROSWELL: $500 → 14%MICHIGAN TECH FUND: $10k → 14%FRIENDS OF FRED MEIJER HEARTLAND TRAIL: $400 → 15%VILLAGE OF BERRIEN SPRINGS: $500 → 15%THUNDER BAY SOCCER ASSOCIATIONS (TBSA): $250 → 16%VILLAGE OF SHELBY - PARKS & RECREATION: $6k → 16%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING: $5k → 16%FRIENDS OF THE GRAND BLANC GRID: $100 → 16%CITY OF HARRISON: $5k → 17%VILLAGE OF SHEPHERD: $2k → 19%PIERCETON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $1k → 11%CITY OF ANDERSON: $6k → 15%AID IN MILAN: $1k → 10%STEM GREENHOUSE INC: $250 → 11%BELDING LABOR DAY COMMITTEE: $6k → 12%COMMUNITY DIABEES CENTER: $500 → 14%MICHIGAN TECH FUND: $10k → 14%OFFICE OF ALUMNI SERVICES WES CHRISTIANSEN SPONSORSHIP: $300 → 15%FRIENDS OF PENTWATER TRAIL: $500 → 16%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%AID IN MILAN: $1k → 10%AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 11%CITY OF PORTLAND: $5k → 12%MICHIGAN TECH FUND: $10k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%ASH CARLTON PARK COMMISSION: $400 → 10%CHANDLER WOODS CHARTER ACADEMY BOOSTERS: $250 → 11%MICHIGAN TECH FUND: $5k → 14%SAMUEL OMOGO FOUNDATION: $300 → 11%THE RIGHT PLACE FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 33% of The F&V Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in MI; by stated purpose, 62%.

The F&V Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$51k · 4 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
28

Total granted

$51k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+5%

Still filing today

75%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureInternationalRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    Michigan Tech Fund
    4× · 2022–2025 · $35k · revenue +16%
  • MS
    MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k
  • RP
    RIGHT PLACE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $4k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • BL
    Belding Labor Day Commttee Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • VO
    VILLAGE OF SHELBY - PARKS & RECREATION
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pleasant Ridge Foundation

The purpose of pleasant ridge foundation is to enhance the quality of life for the residents of the city of pleasant ridge, mi.

—
2
Michigan Industrial and Technology

Encourage ind/tech education

—
3
Michigan Robotics Foundation
Education
4
Evans Scholars Foundation - Michigan

Educational.

Education
5
Greater Lansing Destination Development Foundation
Community Improvement
6
Michigan Laborers Scholarship Fund

To establish a scholargship fund that will support eligible students seeking an education in an accredited vocational school, technical school, or a two or four-year degree grating college or university accredited by the board of education

Education
7
The Michigan Glass Project
Public Benefit
8
Michigan Coalition for Human Rights

Commitment to Human Rights and supporting Civil Rights.

International
9
Michigan Architectural Foundation

The mission of the michigan architectural foundation is to advance public awareness of how architecture enriches life in the state of michigan. it is achieved in three ways: 1)educating a future generation of architecture advocates.…

Arts & Culture
10
Chelsea Education Foundation

To expand educational opportunities, support student achievement, and foster excellence in teaching within the Chelsea School District.

Unclassified
11
Geneva Academic Foundation

Geneva Academic Foundation GAF provides educational experiences and opportunities through student scholarships and classroom grants for technology, programs, and equipment throughout Geneva Community School District 304, grades K-12.

Education
12
Lansing Promise

Lansing Promise helps students in gaining access to higher education through readiness and scholarships.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Right Place Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Grand Blanc Grid. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY OF ANDERSON: $6,000 · OtherCITY OF ANDERSONVILLAGE OF SHELBY - PARKS & RECREATION: $6,000 · OtherVILLAGE OF SHELBY - PARKS & RECREATIONCITY OF PORTLAND: $5,000 · OtherCITY OF PORTLANDIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY OF HARRISON: $5,000 · OtherCITY OF HARRISONMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING: $5,000 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING+18 more: $13,050 · Other+18 moreMichigan Tech Fund: $35,000 · EducationMichigan Tech Fund+4 more: $1,750 · EducationBelding Labor Day Commttee Inc: $6,000 · Arts & CultureCOGNITION: $500 · Arts & CultureRIGHT PLACE FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Community ImprovementSamuel Omogo Foundation: $300 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE GRAND BLANC GRID: $100 · Recreation & Sports
Other$71,050Education$36,750Arts & Culture$6,500Community Improvement$4,000International$300Recreation & Sports$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMichigan Tech Fund: $35,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRIGHT PLACE FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAID IN MILAN: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHREE RIVERS PROMISE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOGNITION: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCADILLAC AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSamuel Omogo Foundation: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChandler Woods Charter Academy Boosters Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTEM GREENHOUSE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE GRAND BLANC GRID: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Michigan Tech Fund ↗
  • Who funds Belding Labor Day Commttee Inc ↗
  • Who funds RIGHT PLACE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AID IN MILAN ↗
  • Who funds THREE RIVERS PROMISE ↗
  • Who funds COGNITION ↗
  • Who funds CADILLAC AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds Samuel Omogo Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Chandler Woods Charter Academy Boosters Inc ↗
  • Who funds STEM GREENHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE GRAND BLANC GRID ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Consumers Energy FoundationMI15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Consumers Energy Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The F&V Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The F&V Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The F&V Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The F&V Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on F&V’s filings →

    More from the funding graph