Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Evo and Ora Deconcini and Thu Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2024still arriving
38
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$84kPhilanthropy$30kArts & Culture$21kHousing & Shelter$21kReligion$16kEnvironment$15kFood & Nutrition$13kHuman Services$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k35 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $46k
$500
Median grant
13
States reached
$605k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA$25,000
SISTER JOSE WOMEN'S CENTER$10,500
CENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
NATIONAL MILL DOG RESCUE$2,500
GRACE ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF LAW FUND$1,500
MORE THAN A BED$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF LAW - INDIGENOUS PEOPLE LAW & POLICY$1,000
SURFRIDER FOUNDATION$1,000
THEATRE BREAKING THROUGH BARRIERS$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION$1,000
FLORENCE PROJECT$1,000
BALO USA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ICAN SHINE: $500 → 6%HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE: $850 → 17%CENTRAL TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOME: $400 → 10%HOLT INTERNATIONAL: $850 → 15%BALO USA: $1k → 9%ICAN SHINE: $500 → 6%HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE: $500 → 17%CENTRAL TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOME: $400 → 10%HOLT INTERNATIONAL: $500 → 15%BALO USA: $1k → 9%CHRYSALIS: $500 → 11%CENTRAL TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOME: $350 → 10%CENTRAL TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOME: $250 → 10%CENTRAL TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOME: $250 → 10%MORE THAN A BED: $1k → 15%MORE THAN A BED: $1k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
WI
NY
MA
OR
SD
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of The Evo and Ora Deconcini and Thu Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 72% of the giving stays in AZ; by stated purpose, 69%.

The Evo and Ora Deconcini and Thu Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$184k · 45 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

45 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
29

Total granted

$184k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+29%

Still filing today

69%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationAnimalsArts & CultureInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    Sister Jose Women's Center
    7× · 2018–2024 · $16k · revenue +365%
  • University of Arizona Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $14k · revenue +109%
  • EA
    EASTERN ARIZONA COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +245%

Funded once

  • GF
    GREEN FIELDS SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
  • SA
    SOUTHERN ARIZONA ANIMAL FOOD BANK INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +21%
  • MA
    MIAMI ARIZONA DOWNTOWN ECONOMIC RESURGENCE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
2
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
Aclu Foundation of Arizona

The mission of the aclu foundation of arizona is to defend and preserve, through litigation and public education, individual rights and freedoms guaranteed to all by the constitution and the laws of the united states and arizona.

Civil Rights
4
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona

The american civil liberties union of arizona is the state's premier guardian of liberty working through the arizona legislature and communities statewide to defend and preserve individual rights and freedoms guaranteed to all by the…

—
5
Tucson Audubon Society

Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.

Animals
6
Lodestar Charitable Foundation

To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the arizona community foundation, an az nonprofit corporation, so long as the arizona community foundation, inc. remains a qualified organization.

—
7
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
8
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
9
Cuenca Los Ojos

Cuenca los ojos works to preserve and restore the biodiversity of the us/mexican borderlands through land protection, habitat restoration and wildlife reintroduction.

Environment
10
The Arizona Pet Project

The arizona pet project creates systemic change and provides resources, so no families are forced to balance their own basic needs of food, shelter, and safety and the needs of their companion animals, often the only meaningful connection…

Animals
11
Arizona Food Bank Network

Develop solutions to end hunger through food banking, public policy and innovation.

Food & Nutrition
12
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arizona Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Balo Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
56/58
Grantees still filing
39/58
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Ed Ahead Inc: $24,500 · OtherEd Ahead IncGRACE ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $15,500 · OtherGRACE ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCHEASTERN ARIZONA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherEASTERN ARIZONA COLLEGE FOUNDATIONCENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE: $10,000 · OtherCENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF LAW FUND: $6,000 · Other+55 more: $80,500 · Other+55 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $30,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUND…EL RIO FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 · PhilanthropyEL RIO FOUNDATI…+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $13,700 · EducationUniversity …UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION: $8,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY …GREEN FIELDS SCHOOL: $3,700 · EducationGREEN FIELD…LAW COLLEGE ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $1,000 · Education+2 more: $1,000 · EducationSister Jose Women's Center: $15,850 · Housing & ShelterHabitat for Humanity Tucson Inc: $4,250 · Housing & ShelterCommunity Food Bank Inc: $10,000 · Food & NutritionCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $1,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SOUTH DAKOTA: $500 · Food & NutritionMORE THAN A BED: $2,000 · Human ServicesBALO USA: $2,000 · Human ServicesCentral Texas Children's Home: $1,650 · Human ServicesHOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $1,350 · Human ServicesTHE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC: $1,350 · Human ServicesiCan Shine Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesChrysalis Shelter for Victims of Domestic Violence Inc: $500 · Human ServicesYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $500 · Human ServicesTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $6,950 · EnvironmentTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EnvironmentBORDERLANDS RESTORATION NETWORK: $1,000 · Environment
Other$146,500Philanthropy$35,000Education$27,400Housing & Shelter$20,100Food & Nutrition$11,500Human Services$10,350Environment$8,950

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEd Ahead Inc: $24,500 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetSister Jose Women's Center: $15,850 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $13,700 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc: $10,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEASTERN ARIZONA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $6,950 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetArizona Theatre Company: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEL RIO FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHabitat for Humanity Tucson Inc: $4,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC: $4,050 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetChildren of God Relief Fund Inc: $3,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNational Mill Dog Rescue: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN ARIZONA ANIMAL FOOD BANK INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMCCROSSAN BOYS RANCH: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGOLD RIBBON RESCUE: $2,275 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetINVISIBLE THEATRE: $2,200 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMORE THAN A BED: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBALO USA: $2,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCentral Texas Children's Home: $1,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR RESPONSIBLE CUBA POLICY FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHORIZONS GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $1,350 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $1,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $1,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC: $1,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS CANCER NETWORK: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARIZONA JUSTICE PROJECT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPWARD BOUND HOUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HEARD MUSEUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATRONATO SAN XAVIER: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLAW COLLEGE ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of Pima Animal Care Center: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetiCan Shine Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHANDI-DOGS SUPPORTING FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetBORDERLANDS RESTORATION NETWORK: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES: $850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCatholic Community Services of Southern Arizona Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHERN ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds Ed Ahead Inc ↗
  • Who funds Sister Jose Women's Center ↗
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds EASTERN ARIZONA COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Arizona Theatre Company ↗
  • Who funds EL RIO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity Tucson Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN FIELDS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Children of God Relief Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds National Mill Dog Rescue ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN ARIZONA ANIMAL FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds MCCROSSAN BOYS RANCH ↗
  • Who funds WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds GOLD RIBBON RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds INVISIBLE THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds MORE THAN A BED ↗
  • Who funds BALO USA ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Children's Home ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR RESPONSIBLE CUBA POLICY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HORIZONS GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ35.1× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Arizona Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · The Kai Family Foundation · Ginny L Clements Charitable Trust · The Intuit Foundation · The Womens Foundation for the State of Arizona · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Evo and Ora Deconcini and Thu Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Evo and Ora Deconcini and Thu Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Evo and Ora Deconcini and Thu Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Evo and Ora Deconcini and Thu Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Evo and Ora Deconcini and Thu Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph