Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Eugene and Marlaina Johnston Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$244k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$868kFood & Nutrition$372kHealth$320kEnvironment$237kHousing & Shelter$233kCommunity Improvement$119kHuman Services$34kArts & Culture$24kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $92k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
$17,600
Median grant
4
States reached
$7.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Pelican Harbor Food Bank$65,000
Friends of Coos County Animals$65,000
World Wildlife Fund$35,100
Best Friends Animal Society$22,000
Oregon Coast Community Action$17,600
Habitat for Humanity$17,600
Coos Elderly Services$3,650
Individual grant recipient$3,650
Coos County Friends of Public Healt$3,650
The ALS Association$3,650
USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Cen$3,650
Coos History Museum$3,650
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Coos Elderly Services: $10k → 17%Coos Elderly Services: $5k → 17%Coos Elderly Services: $5k → 17%Coos Elderly Services: $4k → 17%Coos Elderly Services: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 19 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
2

Total granted

$2.2M
$1k

Still filing today

58%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHealthEnvironmentHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    Friends of Coos County Animals
    8× · 2017–2024 · $561k · revenue +55% · 49% of their budget
  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $237k · revenue +62%
  • BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $147k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $800
  • HD
    HOLLYWOOD DREAMS
    one grant, 2018 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia Gorge Humane Society

Columbia Gorge Humane Society is committed to promoting healthy, safe and lifelong relationships between people and their pets through sustainable programs of education, adoption and spay/neutering. We will endeavor to fight for the abused…

Animals
2
Oregon Friends of Shelter Animals

Rescue, rehabilitate and rehome companion animals

Animals
3
Herding Dog Rescue of Central Oregon

Our mission is to help herding dogs who are abandoned, neglected and abused or simply in the wrong home into a loving appropriate home.

Animals
4
Sos Lost Pet Rescue Nw Inc

Decrease over population of feral cats by trapping and doing spay or neuter. Provide veterinarian care to kittens. Take owner relinquishments of pets they can no longer care for. Taking in abandoned animals and providing veterinary care.…

Animals
5
Animal Shelter Partners

To raise funds to support the coos county animal shelter with supplies, or other services, that the county is not financially able to provide

Animals
6
Central Oregon Animal Friends Home At Last Humane Society

Central Oregon Animal Friends is committed to promoting healthy, safe and lifelong relationships between people and their pets through sustainable programs of education, adoption and spay/neutering. We will endeavor to fight for the abused…

—
7
Little Critter Crew

To help homeless small animals in the state of Oregon by providing adequate shelter and veterinary care.

Animals
8
Rogue Valley Humane Society

The Rogue Valley Humane Society provides compassionate care for stray unwanted displaced and abandoned animals and works toward ending pet overpopulation so that there will be no more homeless pets. We are committed to placing every…

Animals
9
Coalition Advocating for Animals

Cat Rescue

Animals
10
Columbia Humane Society

To assist the community in the successful rehoming (and training) of adoptable animals.

Animals
11
Northwest Wag Rescue

NorthWest Wag Rescue is dedicated to representing the rights of animals everywhere. We work tirelessly to get animals out of shelters and dangerous situations and find them loving forever homes in the Pacific NorthWest.

Animals
12
Willamette Animal Guild

To reduce animal cruelty and suffering, with emphasis on providing low-cost spay/neuter and wellness services. Specifically, WAGs goal is to reduce pet overpopulation through our high-quality, high-volume, low-cost spay/neuter clinic in…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oregon Coast Community Action; the most unlike its peers is Compass Outreach Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Pelican Harbor Food Bank: $347,000 · OtherPelican Harbor Food BankHabitat for Humanity: $182,600 · OtherHabitat for HumanitySalmon Trout Enhancement Program: $145,750 · OtherSalmon Trout Enhancement ProgramUSC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Cen: $68,650 · OtherUSC Norris Comprehensive Cancer CenCoos Cares: $50,000 · OtherCoos CaresIndividual grant recipient: $38,650 · Other+4 more: $49,950 · Other+4 moreFriends of Coos County Animals: $560,750 · AnimalsFriends of Coos County AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $147,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY+2 more: $14,000 · AnimalsWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $237,300 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLI…AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $120,650 · HealthAMYOTROPHI…COMPASS OUTREACH INC: $83,500 · HealthCOMPASS OU…COOS COUNTY FRIENDS OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $8,650 · HealthOREGON COAST COMMUNITY ACTION: $118,600 · Housing & ShelterCoos Elderly Services Inc: $33,650 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN OREGON: $4,500 · Philanthropy
Other$882,600Animals$721,750Environment$237,300Health$212,800Housing & Shelter$118,600Human Services$33,650Philanthropy$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFriends of Coos County Animals: $560,750 over 8y, 49% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $237,300 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $147,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $120,650 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOREGON COAST COMMUNITY ACTION: $118,600 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOMPASS OUTREACH INC: $83,500 over 6y, 7.5% of budgetCoos Cares: $50,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetCoos Elderly Services Inc: $33,650 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetCOOS COUNTY FRIENDS OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $8,650 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetS Nipped: $8,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN OREGON: $4,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Friends of Coos County Animals ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
  • Who funds OREGON COAST COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
  • Who funds COMPASS OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds Coos Cares ↗
  • Who funds Coos Elderly Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds COOS COUNTY FRIENDS OF PUBLIC HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds S Nipped ↗
  • Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN OREGON ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Judith Ann Mogan Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Eugene and Marlaina Johnston Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Eugene and Marlaina Johnston Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 60%
  • Oregon Coast Community Action: 85% of income from government
  • Coos Elderly Services Inc: 60% of income from government
  • United Way of Southwestern Oregon: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Eugene and Marlaina Johnston Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Eugene and Marlaina Johnston Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eugene and Marlaina Johnston’s filings →

More from the funding graph