Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Erickson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$118k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$313kReligion$201kInternational$179kYouth Development$87kHuman Services$50kHealth$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $51k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$20,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUME LAKE CHRISTIAN CAMPS$53,400
Individual grant recipient$30,000
CTAP$20,500
STUDENTS INTERNATIONAL$6,000
GIDEONS$5,000
COMM PRES CHURCH DANVILLE$2,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Joy to the World Foundation: $4k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$514k · 7 repeat orgs$391k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +6% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
17

Total granted

$514k
$337k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+3%

Still filing today

14%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionInternationalHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HL
    HUME LAKE CHRISTIAN CAMPS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $312k
  • CY
    CHRISTIAN YOUTH THEATER
    6× · 2018–2023 · $82k
  • SI
    STUDENTS INTERNATIONAL
    5× · 2018–2024 · $43k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $136k · revenue +33%
  • WC
    WATERSTONE CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • OM
    OUTDOOR MINISTRY SUPPLY
    one grant, 2023 · $42k · revenue -78% · 58% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Influencers Global Ministries

Religious organization devoted to strengthening members' personal faith.

Religion
2
Training Pastors International

Training pastors in third world countries

Religion
3
Explore God Network
—
4
Global Gospel Initiative Inc
Religion
5
Gospel Life Global Missions

Sending disciples to glorify god

—
6
S E Ministries

None

Religion
7
Todd Worldwide Ministries
Housing & Shelter
8
Joyful Word Ministries Inc

Preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Organization travels to churches and conferences throughout the United States and to other countries to teach the Gospel of Jesus Christ through praise, worship, and Bible study.

Religion
9
Discover Your Mission Inc

Supporing missionaries worldwide

Religion
10
Leadership Resources International

International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures

Religion
11
Jesus Ministries International

Promote christian religion through conferences and group meetings.

Religion
12
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Outreach International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Grateful Shepherd Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUME LAKE CHRISTIAN CAMPS INC: $312,484 · OtherHUME LAKE CHRISTIAN CAMPS INCWATERSTONE CHURCH: $100,000 · OtherWATERSTONE CHURCHCHRISTIAN YOUTH THEATER (CYT): $81,506 · OtherCHRISTIAN YOUTH THEATER (CYT)Individual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherGIDEONS: $25,000 · OtherHELPING HANDS: $25,000 · Other+13 more: $83,663 · Other+13 moreGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $136,000 · InternationalGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERN…STUDENTS INTERNATIONAL: $43,263 · InternationalSTUDENTS INTERNATIONALOUTDOOR MINISTRY SUPPLY: $42,000 · ReligionAlternatives: $10,000 · ReligionGRATEFUL SHEPHERD MINISTRIES: $5,000 · Religion+1 more: $1,000 · ReligionSan Diego Spine Foundation: $5,000 · HealthYOUNG LIFE: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentJoy To The World Foundation: $4,000 · Human Services
Other$657,653International$179,263Religion$58,000Health$5,000Youth Development$5,000Human Services$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $136,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSTUDENTS INTERNATIONAL: $43,263 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetOUTDOOR MINISTRY SUPPLY: $42,000 over 1y, 58% of budgetAlternatives: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSan Diego Spine Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJoy To The World Foundation: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOneEleven Global: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds STUDENTS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds OUTDOOR MINISTRY SUPPLY ↗
  • Who funds Alternatives ↗
  • Who funds San Diego Spine Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GRATEFUL SHEPHERD MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds Joy To The World Foundation ↗
  • Who funds OneEleven Global ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Erickson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Erickson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Erickson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph