· Public charity
New Hampshire Humanities Council
Since 1974, new hampshire hummanities has brought the power of ideas to people of all walks of life, in every corner of the state.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $174,343 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $184,343 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $129k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VARIOUS GRANTS - 5000 | $129,198 |
| HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF CHESHIRE CTY | $10,870 |
| QUEERLECTIVE | $10,000 |
| BLACK HERITAGE TRAIL OF NH | $9,500 |
| PORTSMOUTH SUBMARINE & MEMORIAL MUS | $9,275 |
| NH BOOK AND LITERARY FESTIVAL | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 14% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BHBLACK HERITAGE TRAIL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC5× · 2019–2025 · $69k · revenue +216%
- HSHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF CHESHIRE COUNTY3× · 2022–2025 · $49k · revenue +1%
- CVChosen Vale Inc Enfield Shaker Museum2× · 2021–2022 · $44k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- PHPortsmouth Historical Societygraduatedone grant, 2022 · $28k · revenue +56%
- FOFRIENDS OF THE PLAISTOW PUBLIC LIBRARYone grant, 2022 · $21k
- TNTHE NATIONAL SOCIETY OF THE COLONIAL DAMES OF AMERICA IN THE STATE OF NHone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +22%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Maine Historical Society, founded in 1822, is a private non-profit whose mission is to preserve and share Maine's story. Based in Portland, we work closely with communities and partners throughout the state, and serve a statewide and…
To develop and promote awareness of the town of Yarmouth history and acquire, preserve, and exhibit artifacts of historical significance.
To preserve new hampshires agricutural roots and celebrate the contemporary relevance of the states agricultural present
The mission of the Hampton Historical Society is to increase public knowledge and understanding of the history and cultural heritage of the town of Hampton, New Hampshire, from its earliest inhabitants to the present generation. We will…
Preservation of historical memorabilia - town of Hadley MA
To bring together those persons interested in the history of Sunapee and in the collection of, preservation and exhibition of documents, photographs and artifacts pertaining to that history.
Historic preservation
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Hampshire Historical Society and the most unlike its peers is New England Circle D/B/a Global Citizens Circle. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BLACK HERITAGE TRAIL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC ↗
- Who funds HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF CHESHIRE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Chosen Vale Inc Enfield Shaker Museum ↗
- Who funds CANTERBURY SHAKER VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds NH CIVICS ↗
- Who funds World Affairs Council of New Hampshire ↗
- Who funds BELKNAP MILL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds JOURNEYS IN EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds Portsmouth Historical Society ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Historical Society ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL SOCIETY OF THE COLONIAL DAMES OF AMERICA IN THE STATE OF NH ↗
- Who funds POPE MEMORIAL LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds PROPRIETORS PORTSMOUTH ATHENAEUM ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Antiquarian Society DBA Hopkinton Historical Society ↗
- Who funds MT KEARSARGE INDIAN MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds PETERBOROUGH HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE BOOK AND LITERARY FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND CIRCLE D/B/A GLOBAL CITIZENS CIRCLE ↗
- Who funds Friends of Minot-Sleeper Library Inc ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR THE COMMON GOOD ↗
- Who funds Queerlective Inc ↗
- Who funds MANCHESTER HISTORIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
- Who funds Nathalie & Theodore Jones Charitable Trust f/b/o Appalachian Mountain Club ↗
- Who funds MCAULIFFE-SHEPARD DISCOVERY CENTER CORP ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE BOAT MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds SALT PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Audubon Society of New Hampshire ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE THEATRE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds SEE SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CLAREMONT OPERA HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds POSITIVE STREET ART ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · The Eppes - Jefferson Foundation Inc · The McIninch Foundation · Samuel P Hunt Foundation · A Caring Community Inc · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Fidelity Foundation · Eastern Cambridge Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Newburyport Bank Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New Hampshire Humanities Council funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.