Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Ephraim Project Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$79k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$72k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

International$79kReligion$25kHousing & Shelter$25kHuman Services$24kYouth Development$23kFood & Nutrition$3kEducation$2kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $72k
$6,165
Median grant
1
States reached
$9k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$71,867
Nu Numan International Ministries$6,165
Individual grant recipient$1,339
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving35% of grant dollars ($65k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 65% that went abroad ($120k) is mapped below.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ST FRANCIS HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $1k → 13%ST FRANCIS HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $860 → 13%ST FRANCIS HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $625 → 13%St Francis House of Hospitality: $70 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
MI
NY
PA
CA
CO
WV
AZ
KS
SC
OK
FL

Beyond the US65% of all-years giving ($120k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Ethiopia$120k · 5 grants
Uganda$55 · 1 grant

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$137k · 12 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +5% since the first grant, against -27% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
28

Total granted

$137k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
-27%

Still filing today

33%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalFood & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EK
    EMMANUELS KITCHEN INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $2k · revenue +5%
  • SS
    Straight Street Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +105%
  • JV
    JEWISH VOICE MINISTRIES INTL
    2× · 2018–2024 · $2k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • BT
    BLESSING THE CHILDREN DEVELOPMENT O
    one grant, 2022 · $18k
  • NM
    NUMEN MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • BT
    Blessing the Children International
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -79%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Joshuas Mission of Hope Inc

Giving hope to disadvantaged children

Education
2
Bread of Life International Inc

To feed the poor

International
3
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
4
Eben-Ezer Ministries Corp
Religion
5
Samaria Global Ministries

Religious and counselling

6
Feed My Sheep Homeless Outreach

To provide food for the homeless

7
Projects of Hope Inc

Foreign missions and services

Community Improvement
8
Refuge for Prodigals International Bible Ministries Inc
Religion
9
Prepare the Way Ministry

Education, Humanitarian, Community outreach and evangelism ministry. Provide Orphan Care, Train Youth in Career Paths, Train Pastors and Others in Bible School, Prison Ministry, Provide Elementary School for about 300 Children

International
10
Barnabas Leadership Ministries

Ministry

11
Reaching Out to the Nations Inc

Reaching Out To The Nations' mission is to both preach and demonstrate the love of Go through its projects and programs which include preaching, food distribution, widow and orphan assistance and leadership training.

Religion
12
Orphans Hope International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Way of Hope Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $113,969 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBLESSING THE CHILDREN DEVELOPMENT O — $17,810 · OtherBLESSING THE CHILDREN DEVELOPMENT OST GEORGE ORTHODOX CHURCH — $7,050 · OtherNu Numan International Ministries — $6,165 · Other+27 more — $28,036 · Other+27 moreNEW CHRIST FOUNDATION INTERNAT — $1,700 · ReligionJMJ LIFE CENTER INC — $1,500 · Religion+1 more — $100 · ReligionEMMANUELS KITCHEN INC — $1,521 · Food & NutritionStraight Street Inc — $1,500 · Food & NutritionST FRANCIS HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY INC — $2,632 · Human ServicesFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $1,075 · InternationalBECAUSE HE LOVES INC — $1,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $500 · InternationalMORGAN MINISTRIES — $750 · Crime & LegalSTUDENT LEADERSHIP SERVICES INC — $200 · Health
Other$173,030Religion$3,300Food & Nutrition$3,021Human Services$2,632International$2,575Crime & Legal$750Health$200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBlessing the Children International — $4,730 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTHE WAY OF HOPE MINISTRIES INC — $4,500 over 3y, 23% of budgetST FRANCIS HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY INC — $2,632 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetNEW CHRIST FOUNDATION INTERNAT — $1,700 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetEMMANUELS KITCHEN INC — $1,521 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetStraight Street Inc — $1,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH VOICE MINISTRIES INTL — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJMJ LIFE CENTER INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $1,075 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMORGAN MINISTRIES — $750 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDENT LEADERSHIP SERVICES INC — $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOpen Doors With Brother Andrew Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Blessing the Children International
  • Who funds THE WAY OF HOPE MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY INC
  • Who funds NEW CHRIST FOUNDATION INTERNAT
  • Who funds EMMANUELS KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds Straight Street Inc
  • Who funds JEWISH VOICE MINISTRIES INTL
  • Who funds JMJ LIFE CENTER INC
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC
  • Who funds BECAUSE HE LOVES INC
  • Who funds MORGAN MINISTRIES
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds STUDENT LEADERSHIP SERVICES INC
  • Who funds PK Outreach Inc
  • Who funds Open Doors With Brother Andrew Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Ephraim Project Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Ephraim Project Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Ephraim Project Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph