Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Enlightened Bulldog Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$31k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0168% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Health$138kEducation$6kReligion$2kPhilanthropy$2kInternational$2kPublic Benefit$2kArts & Culture$1kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$475k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION$5,511
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$2,643
Individual grant recipient$2,500
YALE LAW SCHOOL$2,500
MICHIGAN 22 PRESIDENTS FUND$2,000
PARK SYNAGOGUE$1,830
Individual grant recipient$1,562
JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND$1,500
MOCA$1,050
Individual grant recipient$1,000
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
AGAINST MALARIA FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
MENDING KIDS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MASS GENERAL ALS: $2k → 16%MOCA: $1k → 14%COMMENTARY MAGAZINE: $500 → 17%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $3k → 14%AGAINST MALARIA FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%ST MAURICE CHURCH: $175 → 11%MIAMI OF OHIO: $1k → 12%SHAKER NATURE CENTER: $518 → 17%MENDING KIDS: $1k → 14%BEAR GIVERS: $75k → 17%OCEAN CONSERVENCY: $300 → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $2k → 14%PETFIX: $50 → 17%BEAR GIVERS: $50k → 17%MICHIGAN 22 PRESIDENTS FUND: $2k → 14%FRONT INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 17%AMERICAN TECHNION: $3k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $2k → 14%FRONT INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 17%AMERICAN TECHNION: $1k → 17%FRONT INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 17%THE NATURE CONSERVENCY: $309 → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $2k → 17%ARK SOLVES: $2k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $888 → 17%MINDS MATTER NATIONAL: $519 → 17%MANDEL JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $515 → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION JHUB: $500 → 17%PARK SYNAGOGUE: $2k → 17%PARK SYNAGOGUE SECURITY FUND: $400 → 17%CLEVELAND ORCHESTRA: $180 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
WY
OH
CT
CA
MO
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$150k · 5 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +112% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
3

Total granted

$150k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+112%
+8%

Still filing today

40%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationYouth DevelopmentInternationalEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BEAR GIVERS INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $125k · revenue +112%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2021–2023 · $11k
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    3× · 2022–2024 · $6k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +8%
  • SM
    ST MAURICE CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $175
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
International Myeloma Foundation

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of myeloma patients while working toward prevention and a cure.

Unclassified
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Group Return

Caring for life, researching for health and educating those who serve.

Health
6
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
7
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
8
Materials Research Society

The materials research society (mrs) is an organization of materials researchers worldwide that promotes communication for the advancement of interdisciplinary materials research and technology to improve the quality of life.

Community Improvement
9
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
10
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
11
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
12
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BEAR GIVERS INC: $125,000 · HealthBEAR GIVERS INCTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $5,511 · Health+2 more: $2,080 · HealthIndividual grant recipient: $11,150 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…University of Michigan: $6,143 · OtherUniversity of MichiganYALE LAW SCHOOL: $4,100 · OtherYALE LAW SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $3,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…Individual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherMICHIGAN 22 PRESIDENTS FUND: $2,000 · OtherPARK SYNAGOGUE: $1,830 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,562 · Other+13 more: $7,752 · Other+13 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $2,388 · PhilanthropyGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationJOSEPH & FLORENCE MANDEL JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $515 · EducationMINDS MATTER NATIONAL INC: $519 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $300 · InternationalOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $300 · EnvironmentThe Musical Arts Association: $180 · Arts & Culture
Health$132,591Other$40,037Philanthropy$2,388Education$1,515Youth Development$519International$300Environment$300Arts & Culture$180

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBEAR GIVERS INC: $125,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $6,143 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $5,511 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $2,388 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $1,080 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Against Malaria Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMending Kids International dba Mending Kids: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMINDS MATTER NATIONAL INC: $519 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOSEPH & FLORENCE MANDEL JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Musical Arts Association: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BEAR GIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Against Malaria Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Mending Kids International dba Mending Kids ↗
  • Who funds MINDS MATTER NATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds JOSEPH & FLORENCE MANDEL JEWISH DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds The Musical Arts Association ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Enlightened Bulldog Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Enlightened Bulldog Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Enlightened Bulldog’s filings →

    More from the funding graph